Questions arise about new #2 man
at Vatican Secretariat of State
[Is he another 'lavender mafia' biggy elevated to prominence by Bergoglio?]
Vatican City, Oct 18, 2018 (CNA).- An Italian newsmagazine has raised new questions about a Vatican official mentioned in the August “testimony” of Archbishop Carlo Vigano. The report from L’Espresso, an Italian newsweekly, could be seen to provide support for at least one claim made in Vigano’s controversial testimony.
L’Espresso, an Italian newsweekly, reported Oct. 12 that Venezuelan Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, 58, who began serving Oct. 15 as 'sostituto' at the Vatican Secretariat of State
[in effect, deputy Secretary of State for internal affairs, responsible for the administrative supervision and coordination of all Vatican offices and agencies, and the #2 man at the Secretariat] might have been dismissed from a seminary where he studied because he was thought by seminary administrators to have a homosexual orientation.
As Sostituto, he is tasked with overseeing much of the day-to-day business of the Vatican’s Curial offices.
The magazine published a February 1985 letter from Archbishop Domingo Perez, then Archbishop of Maracaibo, the archdiocese in which Parra was later ordained. The letter was written to the rector of the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, at which Parra did the first part of his seminary studies before being dismissed.
In the letter, Perez said that he had received negative reports about Parra from the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary, and acknowledged that Parra had been dismissed from studies there. Perez said that he subsequently sent the student to another seminary in Caracas, and had received positive reports about him there.
However, Perez wrote that he had received an anonymous letter alleging that Parra had been expelled from his first seminary because he had a homosexual orientation and was, he wrote “a sexually sick person.”
Perez asked the seminary rector to make inquiries into those allegations.
L’Espresso did not report any additional communications between the archbishop and the seminary rector. Parra was ordained six months after Perez sent the letter.
Parra is among the bishops mentioned in Vigano’s Aug. 25 “testimony” regarding Archbishop Theodore McCarrick. In that document, Vigano claimed that at the time he oversaw personnel for Vatican diplomatic offices, he had received “worrisome information” about Parra, who worked at that time in the Vatican diplomatic corps.
Vigano did not specify what “worrisome information” he had received, but the questions raised about Parra’s seminary formation could seem to fit with the tenor of Vigano’s testimony.
The archbishop’s testimony made claims about the sexuality of other Vatican officials, while arguing that
“the virtue of chastity must be recovered in the clergy and in seminaries. Corruption in the misuse of the Church’s resources and of the offerings of the faithful must be fought against. The seriousness of homosexual behavior must be denounced. The homosexual networks present in the Church must be eradicated.”
The credibility of Vigano’s claims has come under fire lately, as some Vatican officials have denounced his testimony as an attack on Pope Francis.
Nevertheless, an Oct. 7 letter from Cardinal Marc Ouellet, prefect of the Vatican Congregation for Bishops, corroborated Vigano’s central claim, that McCarrick had been directed by the Vatican to withdraw from public life because of reports about his alleged sexually abusive behavior toward priests and seminarians.
On the other hand, Ouellet’s letter refuted the notion that the measures against McCarrick were formal “canonical sanctions,” a claim initially made by Vigano that seems to mostly have been disproven.
A September report from Catholic News Service corroborated Vigano’s claim that the Vatican had received at least some reports about McCarrick as early as 2000.
CNA independently confirmed another Vigano claim, that McCarrick had been ordered by a Vatican official to move out of the Washington, DC seminary where he had been living after his retirement.
On Oct. 18,
L’Espresso added to its report, noting that
Parra had a longtime close relationship with Cardinal Oscar Maradiaga, the coordinator of the pope’s C9 Council of Cardinals. Vigano had also noted this friendship.
The magazine also claimed that the archbishop had developed a friendship with Bishop Juan Jose Pineda, former auxiliary bishop of Maradiaga’s Archdiocese of Tegucigalpa, who resigned recently after having been accused of sexual misconduct involving seminarians and other adult men.
[But no one in the media seems to remember that more than a year ago, the pope sent one of his Argentine bishops on an apostolic visitation to Tegucigalpa to investigate financial and sexual anomalies in that archdiocese, involving both Maradiaga and Pineda in different ways. But the pope never acted on the report, nor in fact, did he ever disclose what the report said. Pineda resigned several weeks ago after more testimony about his sexual misconduct surfaced from seminarians in Tegucigalpa... In short, as with McCarrick, only the public revelation of Pineda's misdeeds forced his hand - and the Vatican's. The Vatican's July 20 announcement of Pineda’s resignation provided no explanation, stating only that it had been accepted by Pope Francis.]
L’Espresso reported Oct. 18 that the Vatican declined to respond to its questions about Parra.