Is Mary the 'Co-Redemptrix' of humanity?
by Francis X. Rocca
Religion News Service
May 28, 2009
VATICAN CITY -- When Pope Benedict XVI told a crowd in St. Peter's Square in April that the Virgin Mary "silently followed her son Jesus to Calvary, taking part with great suffering in his sacrifice, thus cooperating in the mystery of redemption and becoming mother of all believers," most listeners probably heard nothing remarkable in the statement.
After all, devotion to Mary is a pervasive element of the Catholic faith, and one of the features that most clearly distinguishes it from Protestantism.
Yet for one group of devotees, Benedict's statement was a milestone -- a sign that he had moved one step closer to granting their wish for a new dogma on Mary's contribution to human salvation.
At least 7 million Catholics from more than 170 countries, including hundreds of bishops and cardinals, have reportedly signed petitions urging the pope to proclaim Mary "the Spiritual Mother of All Humanity, the coredemptrix with Jesus the redeemer, mediatrix of all graces with Jesus the one mediator, and advocate with Jesus Christ on behalf of the human race."
In other words, the Virgin Mary -- though always subordinate to and dependent on the will of Christ -- plays an active, unique and irreplaceable role in helping her son deliver mankind from sin and death.
Proponents say that such a statement would represent the culmination of the Church's traditional teaching on Jesus's mother, and bring the world untold spiritual and material benefits.
But critics of the proposed dogma say it would exaggerate Mary's true importance and undermine efforts toward unity with other Christian denominations.
The idea of Mary as Christ's collaborator in the redemption of humanity is deeply rooted in Catholic tradition, said Monsignor Arthur B. Calkins, an American priest working at the Vatican who has written extensively on the subject.
"The Church has been meditating on this role for two millennia," Calkins said in an interview, "and so the Holy Spirit continues to draw forth what is there already in seed."
According to Mark Miravalle, a professor of theology at Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio, the new dogma would mean the "climax of the `Age of Mary'," a period that began in 1830 with apparitions of the Virgin in France, and witnessed papal proclamations of her Immaculate Conception (1854) and bodily Assumption into heaven (1950).
Supporters of the dogma of Mary Coredemptrix began petitioning the Holy See in the 1920s, Miravalle said, but it was in the 1990s that the movement drew millions of supporters and its goal began to appear within reach.
Pope John Paul II publicly used the term "Co-redemptrix" at least six times in his pontificate, and at one point Miravalle predicted that he would proclaim the dogma before the millennial year of 2000.
The professor now believes that John Paul was persuaded not to act by advisers who feared that the new dogma would pose an obstacle to ecumenical dialogue.
At least one non-Catholic participant in that dialogue says such fears were well-founded.
"Anglicans require that any dogma be provable from Scripture," said the Rev. William Franklin, academic fellow at the Anglican Centre in Rome and a visiting professor at the Vatican's Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
Anglican ecumenists are still struggling to reconcile their beliefs with the papal dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption, Franklin said. "Making a new Marian dogma would complicate the journey toward full communion between our two churches," he said.
Proponents of the dogma insist that it would actually promote ecumenism by dispelling any ambiguities about Catholic doctrine.
"This would bring new clarity that Catholics do not adore Mary as a goddess," Miravalle said. "It would underscore what Catholics do believe -- that she is your spiritual mother -- but at the same time that she is not the fourth person of the Blessed Trinity."
By far the most significant criticism, if only on account of its source, has been that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict.
Ratzinger told a German interviewer in 2000 that the "formula `Co-Redemptrix' departs to too great an extent from the language of Scripture and of the (Church) Fathers and therefore gives rise to misunderstandings," threatening to "obscure" the status of Christ as the source of all redemption.
"I do not think there will be any compliance with this demand (for papal proclamation of the dogma) within the foreseeable future," he said at the time.
But Benedict has shown increasing openness to the dogma
in the years since, proponents say, even though he has never used the word "Co-Redemptrix" as Pope.
"Joseph Ratzinger has never been more Marian than since he became Benedict XVI," Miravalle said. [That does not necessarily mean 'increasing openness to the dogma', since the theological objection he raised, based on historical fact, is not something that will change!]
Calkins, who carefully tracks the pope's statements on "Mary's role in the work of our redemption," said Benedict's words on the subject already fill up 25 pages.
Most of the church's academic experts on Mary continue to oppose the dogma, however, deeming it unnecessary to encourage a proper devotion to Christ's mother.
"To give Mary honor, I would institute a new feast, or a special title," said the Rev. Johann G. Roten, director of the International Marian Research Institute in Dayton, Ohio, and a member of a Vatican panel that unanimously advised against the new dogma in 1996.
Yet Miravalle says papal recognition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix would be more than a formality; it would lead to an "outpouring of grace," helping to dispel a range of contemporary problems, including abortion, terrorism and natural disasters.
"To the extent that we acknowledge Our Lady's roles, to that extent God allows her to fully exercise those roles," he said. "And we can use some extra grace at this time."
My own view, just based on what is recounted in the Bible about Mary, is that declaring her Co-Redemptrix is completely unnecessary (she works her intercessions and graces equally with or without such a title), and Mary herself would be the first to reiterate that she is but 'the handmaid of the Lord'.
Clearly, God chose her to be the means and vessel for his incarnation as a human being so that, as Jesus Christ, he may redeem mankind from sin.
As a 12-year-old, he told his parents after they 'lost' him in the Temple, "Didn't you know I had to be about my Father's business?" That does not sound like he thought his Father's business - redemption - was anybody else's 'business' on earth but his, i.e., that the divine design for salvation called for a 'co-redemptrix'!
It's not as if the redemption he made possible for mankind would be any less if his mother were not also considered 'Co-Redemptrix'!
And none of this takes away anything from the fact that Mary was chosen by God to be the most blessed among all women and men, that is, among all human beings outside Jesus who was both God and man - because she became the mother of God. If only for that reason alone, we venerate her - and it's more than reason enough!
I think the age-old title for her, Redemptoris Mater - Mother of the Redeemer - says it all.
[Edited by TERESA BENEDETTA 2/14/2010 3:26 AM]