I have always found it difficult to hide my dislike for the de-feminized if not 'masculinized' religious sisters who have been aggressively feminist - they have allowed their feminist liberal politics to override their status as supposed 'religious' and are clearly ignoring the part of their vows about obedience to the Church and its Magisterium.
Thus, my cup of forbearance long spilt over into irritation, to say the least, at their press campaign in recent days questioning the Vatican on why it is investigating them - in a classic 'turn the issue on its head and make them the villains' ploy generally used by politicians. Eventually, I knew, someone would comment and express the same opinion that I have.
Here's one from a priest's blog that also clears up a great many points about the status quo and differentiates clearly between the strident anti-Church activist sisters and the general universe of women religious in teh United States.
The red-herrings of the LCWR
by Philip Neri Powell, O.P.
August 19, 2009
Meeting recently in New Orleans, the LCWR (League of Catholic Women Religious?_ issued a statement on the upcoming theological assessment by the CDF.
Among the predictable "pearl clutching" exclamations of indignation are two charges against the Vatican's probe that are meant to serve as red herrings. Both these charges are made under the general charge of "lack of transparency":
1). Why can't we see the report itself?
2). Who's paying for this investigation?
The first charge sets up an ominous specter of secretive Vatican-doings. You can almost hear the dark, foreboding music in the background as the sisters furrow their collective brow.
The second charge plants the idea that the investigation is being bankrolled by some nefarious right-wing group, implying that the investigation would not be taking place if this group had not paid the Vatican to do it.
Why are these charges red-herrings? How do they attempt to distract readers?
The LCWR is either teaching with the Catholic Church, or it isn't. They are either leading their associated nuns and sisters in the apostolic faith, or they aren't.
The investigation is set to determine whether or not these women religious - vowed to serve the Church - are, in fact, serving the Church honestly or using their vast resources and influence to undermine the Catholic faith.
Having access to the reports will not change nearly forty-years of public statements supporting women's ordination, same-sex marriage, feminist political ideology, etc. Knowing who (if anyone) is paying for the investigation will not change these public statements either.
Basically,
these charges by the LCWR are analogous to a reckless driver charging the police officer who stops him with reckless driving himself. How else did you catch me, Officer? You must have been speeding too! The officer's speeding in no way mitigates the recklessness of the indignate driver.
Here's what the LCWR is really afraid of:
From, the Instrumentum Laboris (this is not the CDF document but the working instrument for the assessment of the quality of life for the sisters, a separate investigation):
If any sister wishes to express her opinion about some aspect of her religious institute, she may do so freely and briefly, in writing and with signature, specifically identifying her institute by title and location.
In order to respect each sister’s freedom of conscience, any sister may send her written comments directly and confidentially to Mother Mary Clare Millea at the Apostolic Visitation Office (PO Box 4328, Hamden, CT, 06514); or by fax: (203-287-5467) by November 1, 2009.
Why is this scary? The LCWR knows what many of us know about the "sisters in the convents." They do not support the neo-pagan/eco-feminist agenda of their leadership conference, but often find themselves intimidated into silence.
By allowing individual sisters to write to Mother Clare (the lead investigator for this assessment), the Vatican is encouraging sisters to express themselves outside the tightly controlled, ideologically pure agenda of the LCWR.
In other words, this move undermines the power of the LCWR to manage the message. The last thing the leadership of any self-proclaimed revolutionary movement wants is public criticism from those they claim to represent. How often do "people's revolutions" end up in the hands of elitist demagogues?
My own experience with nuns and sisters with regard to both assessments is telling. I've yet to run across a "sister in the convent" who understands the reasons for these assessments.
When I describe the stated reasons, they are often shocked and saddened to hear what the LCWR has been spewing against the Church in their name. All they hear about the assessments comes from the LCWR.
It it vitally important for Catholics to understand that the CDF's theological assessement of the LCWR is NOT an investigation into the theological opinions of individual sisters or congregations.
The leadership conference itself is being assessed; that is, the focus of the assessement is on the public statements of conference speakers, conference resolutions, and projects funded by the conference to determine whether or not these adhere to basic Church teaching.
In its forty-year history, the LCWR has publicly supported women's ordination; overturning the Church's teaching on same-sex morality; and seriously questioned the unique and final role of Christ in salvation history (i.e., Christ may not be the only way to God, leading some to hold that other religions can lead to salvation on their own terms). These three areas of dissent have been marked for special attention by the CDF.
This bears repeating: any negative conclusion made by the CDF with regard to its investigation accures to the LCWR itself. . .NOT to individual sisters or congregations; meaning, if the CDF concludes that the LCWR has been deficient in teaching the Catholic faith, this should not be understood as a condemnation of any one sister or congregation.
Investigations into the work of individual theologians is an entirely different process that sometimes takes up to ten years or more.
I am being so adamant about this distinction b/c I fear that faithful Catholics may conclude that a negative evaluation of the LCWR by the CDF means that all (or even most) American religious women are involved in dissident activity. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I am confident that the overwhelming majority of our sisters are doing exactly what they vowed to do: serve the Church. The "non serviam" that the LCWR often proclaims to the Church should not be extended to most sisters.
Please offer prayers and fasts for the LCWR, the CDF, Mother Clare, and especially for the innocent sisters and nuns who are being subjected to this investigation through no fault of their own. Also, encourage individual sisters to write to Mother Clare and express themselves freely.
The fact that the LWCR wuld even bristle at the thought that the Vatican is investigating them is bad enough. Any person who believes himself/herself above suspicion on any matter does not behave so defensively. If you are innocent of any wrongdoing or intention of wrongdoing, you would be the first to welcome any investigation.
It's the prerogative of the Vatican to investigate members of the religious orders which exist by virtue of Vatican recognition, and this means supervision through the Congregation for the Institutes of Consecrated Life.
And yet, these defeminized militants are all acting with 'injured pride', virtually saying "We are above Church law and supervision", that is to say, "We are above the Church Magisterium - we make our own Magisterium. We are better Christians than the Pope or the Curia.". HOW CONTEMPTIBLE! It's hard to cite something that could be more an example of 'bad faith' in more ways than one than this.
But as Jesus said, "Father forgive them..." We can only pray.
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 21/08/2009 20:26]