Here's an appropriate Maundy Thursday story from the taxpayer-funded US National Public Radio...
Are Israel and the Holy See
close to agreement for the Church
to take control of the Cenacle?
by Daniel Estrin
April 5, 2012
The niche in the center is the mihrab, set in the middle of the wall that indicates the direction of Mecca, and therefore the direction towards which the Muslim must pray.
This room, known as the Cenacle on Mount Zion in Jerusalem, is venerated as the site of Jesus's Last Supper. Jews and Muslims also consider the building to be a holy site, and it has been a source of contention for years. Israel and the Vatican may be nearing an agreement.
So if there's one building in Jerusalem that represents the city's tangle of religions, this is it. The ground floor is a Jewish holy site said to house the tomb of the biblical King David. The second floor is the Cenacle, a Christian holy site, the room believed to be the site of Jesus's Last Supper. On the roof, there's an old minaret from when this place was marked a Muslim holy site.
One building, three religions, decades of property disputes. And the fight isn't over.
Shimon Gibson, an archaeologist from London who has excavated sites connected to Jesus's final week, says he believes the Last Supper — and the burial of King David — happened in other parts of the city. Still, Jews, Christians and Muslims venerate this site.
The building was destroyed and rebuilt a few times over. The original Byzantine church was replaced by the Crusaders.
"You can see pilgrims have left their names on the walls," Gibson notes.
Later it was taken over by Muslim Mamluks.
"You can see a mihrab, indicating that at one point this chapel was once a mosque," Gibson says.
Catholic Franciscan friars took custody in the 14th century; 200 years later, they were kicked out by the Ottoman sultan. After the 1967 Mideast war, Israel took control.
Israeli authorities have wanted to avoid allowing the Vatican to administer any kind of authority over a site that today isn't under the control of the Holy See. So Israel limits organized Christian prayers here to just a few times a year.
The Cenacle was 'adapted' temporarily for the Vesper service led by by Pope Benedict when he visited there on May 12, 2009.
There are no crosses on the wall; no chapel. Groups of pilgrims from around the world shuffle in, take snapshots and shuffle out. Sometimes stray cats wander around.
"I am a little bit disappointed, because, yes, I was expecting a place where you can go and pray," says Katharina Iacono of Germany, who sat on a bench in the corner. "It is difficult because [it's] very loud. And with cats and with some smells, it's not very easy."
The Vatican says this building belongs to the church, since friars bought it hundreds of years ago.
"The place is so essential, so much an integral part of the Christian narrative," says the Rev. David Neuhaus, a Catholic vicar in Jerusalem. "Needless to say, it's a dream that we could pray there in regular fashion like other holy places."
It's not the first time in history that Christian prayer here has been limited. In the 16th century, the Ottoman sultan prohibited Christians from the room of the Last Supper.
David's tomb is the main attraction today for devout Jews. Rabbi Avraham Goldstein, who directs a seminary at the site, says he has pleaded with Israeli politicians not to cede any control here.
"The minute they'll make it as a church, Jews, halachically, according to Jewish law, are forbidden to go in there," he says. "It's a disgrace for Israel, you know, it's like milk spilled that you can never return it back."
For two decades, Israel and the Holy See have been trying to work out disputes over church properties in Jerusalem. One of the few remaining thorns is the Last Supper room. Shmuel Ben Shmuel, an Israeli negotiator, says the talks are at a critical moment.
"We don't want to go into all the details right now when we are in the midst of negotiations," he says.
A final agreement could come as early as June.
I had a dismal experience visiting the Cenacle, since one has to pass through the ground floor - where the tomb of David is located - and take the stairs to the Upper Room. The inner courtyard was flooded with rainwater, and one had to walk across planks to get access to the stairs and to the tomb site. The Upper Room is just that - a bare room without any markers, even. But with no other tourists around, it is easy to close your eyes and imagine what it could have been during the Last Supper and then much later, at the first Pentecost, even knowing that the structure itself is certainly not the building where the Christ events happened.
But that was a far better experience than David's tomb downstairs, which was to say the least, disappointing. The first adjective that came to my mind was shabby, and certainly not what I had expected of the shrine of the legendary David, Jesus's ancestor through Mary. [Apparently, this is a sarcophagus into which the Crusaders had safeguarded what was recovered from a medieval site believed to have been David's tomb.] The sarcophagus is situated in a rather small alcove with a not very high ceiling - it's a big rectangular mass that's draped in dark blue velvet with words and symbols in gold thread. Shabbiness and an apparent lack of concern to keep the shrines 'shrine-like' was also what struck me at another major Jewish shrine, Rachel's tomb situated between Jerusalem and Bethlehem and literally in the shadow now of an Israeli garrison and watchtower.
Anyway, for the Cenacle to come back into Catholic hands is something we must pray for. It is too sacred and important a site to be left as neutral space for so long.
