Washington Post sued by family
of Covington Catholic teenager
By Paul Farhi
February 1, 2019
The family of the Kentucky teen who was involved in an encounter with a Native American advocate at the Lincoln Memorial last month filed a defamation lawsuit against
The Washington Post on Tuesday, seeking $250 million in damages for its coverage of the incident.
The suit alleges that
The Post “targeted and bullied” 16-year-old Nicholas Sandmann in order to embarrass President Trump. Sandmann was one of a number of students from Covington Catholic High School in Kentucky who were wearing red “Make America Great Again” hats during a trip to the Mall when they encountered Nathan Phillips, a Native American activist.
News accounts, including in
The Post, and videos of their encounter sparked a heated national debate over the behavior of the participants.
“In a span of three days in January of this year commencing on January 19, the Post engaged in a modern-day form of McCarthyism by competing with CNN and NBC, among others, to claim leadership of a mainstream and social media mob of bullies which attacked, vilified, and threatened Nicholas Sandmann, an innocent secondary school child,” reads the complaint.
It added, “The Post ignored basic journalist standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented, biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump by impugning individuals perceived to be supporters of the President.”
The suit was filed by Sandmann’s parents, Ted and Julie, on Nicholas’s behalf in U.S. District Court in Covington. It seeks $250 million because Amazon chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos paid that amount for the newspaper when he bought it in 2013.
The lengthy complaint, which carried the names of five attorneys from two law firms, alleged
seven “false and defamatory” articles published online or in print by The Post. It also cited tweets sent by The Post to promote its stories.
[There had to be an agenda and 'malice aforethought' if the Post persisted in its wrong reporting in seven articles over three dates in addition to promotional tweets. Because anyone with an objective eye realized within hours, upon seeing full video coverage of the incident, that the first reports constituted fake news based on a calculatedly edited video clip meant to inflame public opinion against Catholic pro-life Trump-supporting white boys - every single one of those adjectives representing politically incorrect anathema to 'liberal' minds.
So for the Post to persist in its biased reporting and commentary for 3 days was nothing but sheer exploitation of an 'ideological story' in which their readers could wallow indulgently. I bet there never was an apology or an appropriate correction to their mis-reporting. So we should all want this lawsuit to prosper - even if it is hard to imagine a Washington DC jury finding the Post guilty, and if it did, granting anything more than a rap on the knuckcle and no damages at all - because in this land of free expression, or the First Amendment, or whatever, it is time the media became answerable for their overweening and arrogant irresponsibility. Freedom of expression is not a license to tell defamatory lies, especially with evidencethat objectively refutes those lies.]
The Sandmanns’ lead attorney is L. Lin Wood, who represented Richard Jewell, the security guard falsely accused in the bombing of Centennial Olympic Park in Atlanta in 1996. He also represented John and Patsy Ramsey in pursuing defamation claims against media outlets in connection with reports on the death of their young daughter, JonBenet.
A Post spokeswoman, Kristine Coratti Kelly, said in response to the suit, “We are reviewing a copy of the lawsuit, and we plan to mount a vigorous defense.”
According to the allegations made in the complaint, Nicholas Sandmann and his classmates were waiting for a bus at the Lincoln Memorial after attending the March for Life rally on the Mall when a group of African American men who call themselves Hebrew Israelites began yelling racial epithets at them. The high school group began a series of school sports chants in response, the complaint said.
Phillips, a self-described Native American activist who was on the Mall that day for the Indigenous Peoples March, has said he was walking toward the Lincoln Memorial when he encountered the Covington group. He was chanting and beating a small drum when he came face to face with Sandmann.
The Sandmanns’ suit asserts that the newspaper “bullied” Sandmann in its reporting “because he was the white, Catholic student wearing a red ‘Make America Great Again’ souvenir cap.”
It calls Phillips “a phony war hero [who] was too intimidated by the unruly Hebrew Israelites to approach them, the true troublemakers, and instead chose to focus on a group of innocent children.”
It added that
The Post “did not conduct a proper investigation before publishing its false and defamatory statements of and concerning Nicholas.”
It also accused The Post of
ignoring online videos that showed a fuller picture of the incident and of using “unreliable and biased sources,” thus acting with “knowledge of falsity or a reckless disregard for the truth.”
A plaintiff must show that a defendant acted with “reckless disregard” to sustain a defamation action.
[Does three days of accusatory articles and commentary despite evidence to the contrary not constitute 'reckless disregard'?]
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 20/02/2019 20:31]