Spiffero is an Italian word that means either ‘draft’ (as in air that comes in through a fissure) or ‘a tale told’, and the blog Anonimi della Croce has been using it (in it plural form) to label stories told to them by their sources in the Vatican. As you can see, their series now comes to #57.
You may believe this story or not, but to me, it sounds plausible – especially considering that, even as many Vaticanistas had been warning that Humanae Vitae was to be the next major encyclical targeted for sabotage by this pope, I was quite unprepared for the nakedly unequivocal manner by which Fr. Chiodi launched what seemed to be the Bergoglian battering ram for the anti-HV offensive. It might have been less effective as an opening move if he had not then openly cited AL as the justification for discarding HV, and that’s it! He thereby flung open the gates for Bergoglians to use AL to justify any sin that is no longer sin for Bergoglians.
I had thought that openly recognizing homosexuality and other sexual deviancies now in fashion (as in LGBT) as ‘natural’ human attributes that no one can deny to any human being – as well as their resulting assorted unions – was going to be Bergoglio’s next great ‘un-sinning’ initiative after RCD adulterers. But now, he is going for what is undoubtedly the most widespread sin in the Catholic world since the 1950s - artificial contraception. So he thinks it is easier to debunk an encyclical than it would be to promulgate some papal decree granting benediction to all sexually deviant practices and those who practice them? Think of the other Catholic No-Nos in line for Bergoglian un-sinning: a carnally sexual life for priests, or granting communion to those who do not believe in the Trans-substantiation, not to mention the liturgical travesty of 'an ecumenical Mass'… This man has gone way past the limits of any possible justification for his anti-Catholic, anti-Christian actions, and I cannot now look at any picture of him without seeing him sprouting horns and spewing hellfire…. Yet is is the same man that I dutifully and fervently pray for in the 'Te igitur' at Mass (except, of course, that I always add, "...our Pope emeritus Benedict XVI", before going on to the bishop, and I do not just say 'Cardinal Dolan' but "all the bishops of the world").]
Spifferi LVII: The danger of schism
Via a proposed ‘act of fidelity’
to the pope and his teaching to be
required of all men of the Church
by Fra Cristoforo
Translated from
January 8, 2018
Let me begin by saying that what is reported in our Spifferi comes from a source that is very 'in' at the Vatican. And that he tells me what he considers to be important from what he is able to 'catch' from the entourage that daily hang around Casa Santa Marta. Therefore I report only what was confided to me. Which I publish because I owe it to the truth.
I can assure you that my source is worthy and reliable. Proven by the fact that so many Spifferi have, alas, been sadly confirmed in reality. And for those that have not yet been confirmed, it's a matter of time, but they will be. As you know, things at Casa Santa Marta can change from one day to the next. Depends on the papal mood. We are simply ambassadors, and as they say, ambassadors are not to blame for the bad news they may bring.
That being clear, we come to the current Spiffero.
Bergoglio always was clear about the 'reforms' he wants. From the first moment of his pontificate, he has hammered on migrants, climate and ecumenism. And with the publication of AL, he has signed, sealed and delivered his relativism in terms of morality. So these points have been firmed up in the 'new church'. [Fra Cristoforo calls it 'neo-chiesa', but it really is properly called 'the church of Bergoglio'. To say 'new church' implies he is capable of changing the one true Church of Christ, as he thinks he is doing. Except that no one gets to change the one true Church of Christ, and he who claims to do so is guilty prima facie of apostasy.]
In almost all the parishes now, it is all they talk about. To the faithful and to children being catechized, nothing is taught by Bergoglio's 'word'. Like an obsession.
But as we have seen these days, not everyone is in line. And among the resisters are some bishops and cardinals. This is what worries Bergoglio. Thoe who resist him. He cannot stand for it, nor can he stand them. Perhaps because it is stronger than he? So this is what they have been studying at Casa Santa Marta for some months now.
My source tells me that
a sort of "act of fidelity to the pope (obviously to Papa Omissis) and to his magisterium" is under study. (I have deliberately not capitalized any of the nouns).
This ‘act of fidelity’ will be required of all clerics in the Catholic Church – deacons, priests, bishops and cardinals. And it must be formally professed. In the various dioceses, a day will be chosen on which all clerics – from the bishop to the deacons – shall ‘solemnly’ profess this formal act of fidelity. Which would really mean ‘blind fidelity’ to the ‘magisterium’ and teachings of Bergoglio. Of course this will be obligatory, not optional. Whoever fails to declare this ‘promise’ solemnly should consider himself suspended a divinis [cannot legitimately exercise his priestly ministry].
If this particular Spiffero should come to pass – and I hope it does not – then we shall really be at a turning point. A schism [even if not formal] from which I don’t think any Catholic can consider himself exempt [he has to be on one side or the other]. Because how can one profess fidelity to a heretical magisterium?
[And here I go again: Worse than heretical, it is apostate!]
I think here will be a rupture never before seen in the history of the Church. Between Bergoglio’s new church and those who remain faithful to the traditional teachings of the Church.
[Except, as I keep pointing out, in this schism, it’s certainly not the orthodox Catholics who will leave the Church! But neither will Bergoglio and his followers, because right now, their only strength is that he happens to be the pope, with all the authority and power that goes with it. So he will insist on the fiction that his ‘new church’ – the church of Bergoglio – is really the same ‘holy, Roman Catholic and apostolic Church’ that he was elected to lead, only now it is ‘a new re-formed and reformed church’. So what will he do? Excommunicate all those who refuse his teachings and his increasingly questionable because morally rotten ‘leadership’? Fine ‘symbol of unity’ this pope has turned out to be! And he’ll only make it worse. So please, God, take him NOW but give him the grace of a deathbed repentance.]
As for the timing, my source thinks within a few months, because the text of the ‘act of fidelity’ is already being prepared.
I think it is time more than ever to increase our prayers. Let us invoke Our Lady strongly that she may save us from this disaster. Let us offer Eucharistic Adoration. Let us pray to the apostles, the martyrs, the saints, the souls in purgatory, the angels and the archangels, and all the heavenly host. Let us storm Heaven as much as we can. Because if such a rupture occurs, the ensuing battle will be fierce.
[Bergoglio and all the legions of Satan against faithful Catholics.]
Let us pray all we can. Let us pray for each other, so that none of us will yield to the enemy. Let us fast if we can.
It is true that Our Lord promised us that ‘the gates of Hell would not prevail’ against his Church. But he did not say there would not be a battle. There will be. And it will be decisive.
[At least at this moment in history. But time will not stop still.][COLORE][Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 12/01/2018 04:48]