| | | OFFLINE | | Post: 31.748
Post: 13.836 | Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Registrato il: 20/01/2009 | Administratore | Utente Gold | |
|
I am loath, of course, to have to post about Benedict XVI and Cardinal Sarah in the same breath as Cardinal Mueller, whose fence-straddling and constantly shifting equivocations I find revolting (and inexplicable if he is indeed as orthodox as he professes to be). Surely Benedict XVI who followed Christ's precept to "Let your Yes mean Yes, and your No mean No", could not possibly condone Mueller's very public equivocations. But the article is what it is, so be the judge...'
The influence of Benedict XVI
on Cardinals Müller and Sarah
Books by the two cardinals demonstrate the deep and lasting impact
of the thought and work of Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI
by Paul Senz
December 12, 2017
The legacy and papacy of Benedict XVI still looms large over the Catholic Church. This is not due to any ongoing activity on his part; he has lived up to his promise to remain silent in retirement, to devote himself to contemplation and prayer. But his lifetime of teaching and preaching, and the relationships he formed, continue to influence the Church today.
Two prominent examples of his influence are Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller and Cardinal Robert Sarah. Cardinal Müller, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (a post Benedict held as Joseph Ratzinger for more than 20 years), has a longstanding friendship with Benedict, and has been immeasurably influenced by his thought over many years. He was named as Prefect by Pope Benedict in 2012, but his mandate was not renewed by Pope Francis when it ran out in July 2017.
Cardinal Sarah is currently the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. In 2010, Pope Benedict XVI named him President of the Pontifical Council Cor Unum, and he was named to his current post by Pope Francis in November of 2014.
There is another thing these men have in common: both have recently had book-length interviews published by Ignatius Press, and in both cases, there are unmistakable marks that point towards Joseph Ratzinger as a major influence on the thought of both men.
If there is one thing that is clear from the first page of the recent interview book with Gerhard Ludwig Cardinal Müller, it is that the until-recently-Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is in perfect continuity with his predecessor-but-one, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI. [Difficult to see any 'perfect continuity'when one defends the exhortation from hell as being interpretable in the light of Church tradition, and never once mentions Benedict XVI's unforgettable answer to a Brazilian couple who asked about the plight of remarried divorcees at the World Meeting of Families in Milan in 2012.
Which, incidentally, Fr. Z somehow revived today, and in which Benedict XVI says that those who cannot receive Communion because they cannot be absolved - i.e., because they continue to live in adultery - always have the recourse to spiritual communion. And as a sinner who did not go to Mass for more than two decades in my life, I can vouch for the consolations and satisfactions of spiritual communion. imperfect and incomplete as it is. In fact, I find the "Domine non sum dignus..." one of the most beautiful invocations in our prayer armamentarium.]
This continuity is not only to be found by the keen-eyed: it is explicitly identified by the author and interviewer, Father Carlos Granados, and can even be found in the title of the book. The Cardinal Müller Report is a direct reference to the groundbreaking book-length interview conducted by journalist Vittorio Messori called The Ratzinger Report. [I did find the frank derivation of the title questionable though I can understand it is opportunistic. The original Spanish title of Mueller's book is "Informe sobre la esperanza" (Report on hope), a direct takeoff from the Spanish title for the RATZINZGER REPORT, "Informe sobre la fe" (Report on the faith), in turn based on the original Italian title RAPPORTO SULLA FEDE. But the Mueller takeoff from the Ratzinger book title was always questionable from the start, because what 'hope' was he reporting on? The book was published shortly after the 2015 'family synod' when all hell was already breaking loose in the Church for the open deception and manipulation towards the pope's desired result that had marked the 'family synods'. I am curious to find out what Mueller found as cause for hope in the church of Bergoglio - at least enough to report on,and how he did so!]
The interview was originally conducted in Spanish, with three books on the table between the men: the Bible, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and a Spanish-German dictionary. That and the mind of the cardinal was all that was needed. In the book’s Introduction, the interviewer explains that, “The parallelism is certainly intended as a homage to the friendship between the current prefect and the pope emeritus; but it is also, above all, intended to bring to bear the focus of that interview. In it, Ratzinger completely and accurately diagnosed the situation of the Church, its causes and its effects, and also proposed some paths to a solution. It can be said that ensuing events have validated his focus, which was the subject of so much argument at the time” (x-xi)." [I doubt Mueller would or could have given an honest diagnosis of the church of Bergoglio when he was part of it.]
Time and again throughout the book, Cardinal Müller refers to the thought of Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI as a means of organizing or bookending his remarks. His close relationship with the pope emeritus has allowed him a special insight into his mind, and they are certainly of one mind in most instances.
The Cardinal Müller Report has a somewhat different flavor to it now, in retrospect. The book came out a matter of months before Cardinal Müller was replaced as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. As with so much during the current papacy, this move has been met with no little suspicion and speculation.
One seems to be able to detect a certain amount of hesitation or cautious wording in some of Müller’s responses; perhaps a hesitation that he would not have employed had he already been out of his post, something suggested by more blunt comments made by Cardinal Müller in recent months. [I wish Mr. Senz had the good sense to at least tell us why the book could be called a 'report on hope'! I certainly did not get the impression in previous accounts of the book that it even referred to Spe Salvi, Benedict XVI's encyclical masterpiece on Christian hope, which is inextricably tied in with the Four Last Things, a topic hardly if ever touched on in this pontificate, nor to my knowledge, by Mueller.]
For many, Cardinal Robert Sarah (pronounced Suh-RAH) was a surprise choice for Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. For those who accept a narrative of discontinuity between Pope Francis and what came before, Cardinal Sarah may have been the last person on earth they expected to be appointed. [Which was obviously a very political move: Bergoglio needed to replace Sarah as head of the Cor Unum because Sarah's ideas about Catholic charity are those of Benedict XVI in his much under-reported 2012 motu proprio about institutional charity, yet he could not just dismiss the highest-ranking African member of the Curia. And so the promoveatur to the CDW, where the pope has since virtually divested Sarah of any authority.]
Cardinal Sarah is, if nothing else, in complete continuity with Joseph Ratzinger when it comes to things liturgical. But it is not only on liturgical matters that Cardinal Sarah serves as a beacon of continuity with the pope emeritus.
In fact, his most recent book-length interview, titled The Power of Silence, includes an Afterword written by none other than the Pope Emeritus, Benedict XVI. In this Afterword, he praises Cardinal Sarah’s insights and wisdom, as well as his humility.
“Of course he speaks hardly at all about himself,” Benedict writes, “but now and then he does give us a glimpse into his interior life.” This could well be said of the Pope Emeritus himself. Seldom focused on himself or his own accomplishments and wisdom, he always strove to point the reader or listener to God, to contemplate the face of Jesus Christ.
Joseph Ratzinger, the great professor, the magister that the Church so sorely needed in its fight against what he called the dictatorship of relativism and other evils, has always understood the value of words —including knowing when to use few, or none. In his efforts to encourage silence and silent, intimate communion with God, Cardinal Sarah echoes the sentiments of Benedict XVI.
It is difficult to count the number of times through The Power of Silence that Cardinal Sarah quotes the work of Joseph Ratzinger-Pope Benedict XVI. However, the sheer number of these quotations demonstrates how unified the teaching of these two men is. In addition, these quotations together can serve as a sort of programmatic summary of the thought of Cardinal Robert Sarah.
At one point, the cardinal quotes from Cardinal Ratzinger’s book A New Song for the Lord: “Wherever God’s word is translated into human words there remains a surplus of the unspoken and unspeakable which calls us to silence... God reveals himself, but our human words fail to express his immensity, depth,and mystery. He forever remains beyond our words. And how small God would be if we understood him!” (p 127) These words may as well have been written by Cardinal Sarah!
It is no surprise that the pope emeritus would have such kind and intimate words in regards to Cardinal Sarah’s book about silence. Especially in the context of the liturgy, this was something near and dear to his own heart.
Again, quoting Cardinal Ratzinger during a discussion of the liturgy:
“‘If we do not understand the place of silence, we run the risk of bypassing the Word of God, also. Therefore we must enter into this depth of silence in which the mystery greater than all human words is communicated. This step is essential…. God is above all the great silence. It is necessary to escape the multiplication of words in order to rediscover the Word. If there is no silence by which to enter into their depth, the words themselves become incomprehensible. And the liturgy, the presence of the great mystery of God, must therefore be also the place where we have the opportunity to enter into the depths of our souls’” (p 128)
Cardinal Sarah quotes the writings of Joseph Ratzinger over and over again, and always in strong agreement. Perhaps the most typical quotation, and one which really speaks to the hearts of both men, is from Ratzinger’s “The Regensburg Tradition and the Reform of the Liturgy” (which appears in Joseph Ratzinger Collected Works: Theology of the Liturgy), in reference to the Eucharistic Prayer:
“Must we not relearn this silent, inner co-praying with each other and with the angels and saints … and with Christ himself,” so that we do not lose “the real inner event of the liturgy, the departure from human speech into being touched by the eternal”?
The words of the pope emeritus in the Afterword to Cardinal Sarah’s book help to illustrate the unity of these two great and unfathomable minds – and hearts. “We should be grateful to Pope Francis for appointing such a spiritual teacher as head of the congregation that is responsible for the celebration of the liturgy in the Church,” he writes.
“With the liturgy, too, as with the interpretation of Sacred Scripture, it is true that specialized knowledge is necessary. But it is also true of the liturgy that specialization ultimately can talk right past the essential thing unless it is grounded in a deep, interior union with the praying Church, which over and over again learns anew from the Lord himself what adoration is. With Cardinal Sarah, a master of silence and of interior prayer, the liturgy is in good hands.”
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 13/12/2017 14:50] |