feed
top
crea forum
cerca
feed
forum
supporto
discussione
cerca
È soltanto un
Pokémon con le armi
o è un qualcosa di più? Vieni a parlarne su
Award & Oscar!
Benedetto XVI Forum
Luogo d'incontro di tutti quelli che amano il Santo Padre.
Cerca
Mainly about BENEDICT XVI, plus relevant items on the Church & the Vatican
Accedi
THE CHURCH MILITANT - BELEAGUERED BY BERGOGLIANISM
Messaggi
OFF
LINE
TERESA BENEDETTA
Post: 31.575
Post: 13.663
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Registrato il: 20/01/2009
Administratore
Utente Gold
0
0
11/10/2017
22:03
ALWAYS AND EVER OUR MOST BELOVED BENEDICTUS XVI
Reformable???
October 11,2017
The First Vatican Council defined the dogma that
ex cathedra pronouncements
of the Roman Pontiff were infallible
ex sese et non ex consensu Ecclesiae
(in itself and not from the consent of the Church); and that they were
irreformabiles
.
This welcome and necessary clarification of the standing of the highest class of papal statement left the field wide open to the implication that
papal pronouncements which are
not ex cathedra
might require the
consensus Ecclesiae
before being fully recognised as the unalterable Teaching of the Church of all the Ages. And that such lesser papal statements might be
reformabiles.
This, after all, is only common sense. Even if it might be difficult for the most hardline of the hyper-ultra-ueber-papalists, with
their unCatholic belief that Pope Francis is
ipsissima vox Spiritus Sancti
(the very voice of the Holy Spirit),
to grasp it.
The differing interpretations of various bishops and Episcopal Conferences make clear that Amoris laetitia, at least in the interpretation put upon it by the Bergoglians, does not have the
consensus Ecclesiae
And the suggestions of Cardinals Mueller and Parolin, that dialogue should open between
the two 'sides' into which Pope Francis has so lamentably divided our Holy Mother the Church,
surely open up the possibility that Amoris laetitia may be clarified and freed of its ambiguities ... in other words, treated as reformabilis.
A minute but interesting piece of pedantry:
Are footnotes
an integral part
of a Magisterial text? Surely not. Surely, therefore,
footnotes could be either expunged or redrafted; new, clarifying, footnotes could be added
.
[Not that's a sensible and very doable suggestion! Given the right will and attitude, that is.]
Call me flabby if you like, but
I do think that the current regime should be given ways of saving face. However,
an essential part of such a dialogue would have to be the publication of the Comments sent to the HF after the CDF had studied the draft of the Apostolic Exhortation
.
[Ain’t going to happen! Again, the Bergoglian strategy appears to be to perseverate in deliberately confusing propositions (precisely because, clearly said, they could be materially heretical),thus reinforcing one of the elements defining persistent heresy!]
Meanwhile, the Catholic Herald today points out
:
“Cardinal Christoph Schönborn has said that
Amoris Laetitia is fully in line with the Catechism of the Catholic Church
in an interview marking its 25th anniversary.
[It’s called lying through your teeth. Who is your confessor, Your Eminence?]
A Google translation of the kathpress account is here:
http://cathcon.blogspot.com/2017/10/amoris-laetitia-ist-ganz-in-der-linie.html
The triumphant smugness of Cardinals Baldisseri and Schoenborn brandishing a copy of AL.
[
Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 09/11/2017 06:08
]
Visualizza l'intera discussione
Registrati
Accedi
Mainly about BENEDICT XVI, plus relevant items on the Church & the Vatican
Accedi
IL MIO PROFILO
LE MIE DISCUSSIONI
FORUM CHE SEGUI
LA MIA FORUM-CARD
MODIFICA FORUM-CARD
FAQ
TRADUCI
LOGOUT
Accedi
Registrati
FAQ
TRADUCI
Scatta o carica foto
Allega file
Inserisci link da url (card)
Incorpora url (YouTube/Twitter/...)
ACCETTA
RIFIUTA
Anteprima