È soltanto un Pokémon con le armi o è un qualcosa di più? Vieni a parlarne su Award & Oscar!

Benedetto XVI Forum Luogo d'incontro di tutti quelli che amano il Santo Padre.

BENEDICT XVI: NEWS, PAPAL TEXTS, PHOTOS AND COMMENTARY

  • Messaggi
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.109
    Post: 8.601
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 16/01/2013 17:25






    See preceding page for earlier entries todah, 1/16/13.




Wednesday, January 16, First Week in Ordinary Time



ST. BERARD AND 5 COMPANIONS (d Morocco, 1220), First Franciscan Martyrs
Berard was personally received into the Franciscan Order by St. francis in 1213. By 1219, Francis decided the time
had come to spread the Gospel to the Muslim countries of North Africa. He chose Berard, who spoke Arabic and was
an eloquent preacher, with two other priests and three brothers to go to Morocco. They first spent some time preaching
in Spain and Portugal before crossing to Morocco. Their preaching and denunciation of Islam immediately drew the ire
of local rulers who cast them into prison. When they steadfastly refused to renounce the faith, the king himself
beheaded them. When their remains were brought to Portugal, their story inspired a young Augustinian canon to join
the Franciscan order, going on to gain enormous fame as Anthony of Padua, the greatest preacher of his day. Berard
and his companions were canonized in 1481.

Readings for today's Mass: usccb.org/bible/readings/011612.cfm


AT THE VATICAN TODAY

General Audience - Continuing his catecheses for the Year of Faith, the Holy Father reflected today on
God's revelation of himself to mankind, which culminated in showing his face to us in Jesus. At the end
of his plurilingual greeting to the pilgrims assembled in Aula Paolo VI, he reminded the faithful that
the annual Week of Prayer for Christian Unity begins on January 18.


The Vatican released the text of a Vatican Radio interview with Mons. Dominique Mamberti, Vatican Secretary
for Relations with States, in which he comments on the recent decisions handed down by the European Court
of Human Rights regarding the free exercise of religious belief in the United Kingdom.


@Pontifex 1/16/13

[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 21/01/2013 08:41]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.110
    Post: 8.602
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 16/01/2013 20:32

    Benedict XVI, Te Deum, 12/31/12 (Photo by Spaziani)
    The cope bears the coat of arms of Blessed John XXIII, for whom it was originally made.


    Thanks to Gloria, from her new crop of Spaziani photographs of recent papal events.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 16/01/2013 20:38]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.111
    Post: 8.603
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 01:30



    GENERAL AUDIENCE TODAY
    'The face of God in Jesus'







    Jesus told the Apostles:
    'Whoever has seen me
    has seen the Father'

    Adapted from

    January 16, 2013

    Under torrential rain, pilgrims huddled in queues to enter the Aula Paolo VI this morning for the Holy Father's General audience.

    Continuing his catechetical cycle for the Year of Faith, Pope Benedict XVI reflected on God's revelation of himself to man throughout history, culminating in Jesus Christ, in whom man finally saw the face of God. In English, he said:

    During the Christmas season we celebrated the mystery of the Incarnation as the culmination of God’s gradual self-revelation to Israel, a revelation mediated by those great figures such as Moses and the Prophets who kept alive the expectation of God’s fulfilment of his promises.

    Jesus, the Word made flesh, is truly God among us, "the mediator and the fullness of all revelation" (Dei Verbum, 2). In him, the ancient blessing is fulfilled: God has made his face to shine upon us (cf. Num 6:25).

    As the Incarnate Son, the one mediator between God and man (cf. 1 Tim 2:5), Jesus does not simply speak to us about God; he shows us the very face of God and enables us to call him our Father. As he says to the apostle Philip, "whoever has seen me has seen the Father" (Jn 14:9).

    May our desire to see the Lord’s face grow through our daily encounter with him in prayer, in meditation on his word and in the Eucharist, and thus prepare us to contemplate for ever the light of his countenance in the fullness of his eternal Kingdom.

    At the end of the audience, the Holy Father asked the faithful to offer prayers during the coming Week of Prayer for Christian Unity which begins January 18 and will end on the Feast of the Conversion of St, Paul on January 25.

    The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity begins the day after tomorrow, on Friday, January 18. This year, the theme is 'What the Lord asks of us', from a passage in the book of the prophet Micah (cfr Mi 6 ,6-8).

    I call on everyone to pray, asking God insistently for the great gift of unity among all the disciples of the Lord. May the inexhaustible power of the Holy Spirit urge us to a sincere commitment to seek unity so that we may all profess together that Jesus is the Savior of the world.




    Here is a translation of the catechesis:

    Dear brothers and sisters,

    The Second Vatican Council, in its Constitution on Divine Revelation, Dei verbum, said that the intimate truth of all the Revelation of God shines forth for us "in Christ", who is both the mediator and the fullness of all Revelation" (No. 2).

    The Old Testament tells us how God, after the creation, despite original sin, despite the arrogance of man in wanting to put himself in place of his Creator, offered once more the possibility of his friendship, above all through his alliance with Abraham and the destiny of a small people, that of Israel, that he had chosen not with the criteria of earthly power, but simply out of love.

    It is a choice that remains a mystery and reveals the style of God who calls some, not to exclude others, but so that they may be a bridge that leads to him: Election is always an election for the other.

    In the history of the people of Israel, we can follow the stages of a long journey during which God makes himself known, he reveals himself, he enters into their history with words and actions. For this work, he used mediators like Moses, the Prophets, the Judges, who communicated his will to the people, reminded them of their duty to be faithful to the covenant, and kept alive the expectation of the full and definitive realization of the divine promises.

    It is precisely the realization of these promises that we contemplated at the Feast of the Nativity: The Revelation of God had reached its culmination, its fullness. In Jesus of Nazareth, God truly visits his people, he visits man in a way that goes beyond every expectation. He sent his only-Begotten Son. God himself became man.

    Jesus does not tell us something about God, he does not just speak of the Father, but he is the Revelation of God, he is God, and thus he reveals to us the face of God.

    In the Prolog to his Gospel, St. John writes: "No one has ever seen God. The only Son, who is God and who is at the Father’s side, has revealed him"
    (Jn 1,18).

    I wish to dwell on this 'revelation of the face of God'. In this respect, St. John, in his Gospel, reports a significant fact that we just heard. With his passion imminent, Jesus reassures his disciples, asking them to have no fear, and to have faith. Then he begins a dialog with them in which he speaks about God the Father (cfr Jn 14,2-9)

    At a certain point, the apostle Philip asks Jesus, “Master, show us the Father, and that will be enough for us” (Jn 14,8) Philip is very practical and concrete, and says what we too would want to say: Show us the Father, we want to 'see' the Father, to see his face.

    Jesus's answer is not just for Philip but also for us, and introduces us to the heart of the Christological faith. The Lord says, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father"
    (Jn 14,9).

    This sentence expresses in sum the novelty of the New Testament, the novelty that first appeared in that cave in Bethlehem: God can be seen, God has shown his face, he is visible in Jesus Christ.

    The theme of 'the search for the face of God' is present throughout the Old Testament - the desire to know this face, the desire to see God as he is, such that the Hebrew word panim which means 'face', recurs at least 400 times, and 100 of these refer to God - 100 references to God, the desire to see the face of God.

    And yet the Jewish religion prohibits images altogether, because God cannot be 'represented', as other nearby peoples did with their adoration of idols. Therefore, with this ban on images, the Old Testament seems to totally exclude 'seeing' in worship and in piety.

    What did it mean then for the pious Israelite to seek the face of God, knowing that there could never be an image of him? The question is important. On the one hand, it says that God cannot be reduced to an object, like an image that one can take in the hand, nor can anyone be put in God's place.

    On the other hand, it says God has a face, namely, a 'You' with which one can enter into a relationship, who is not closed in his Heaven to look down on mankind from on high. God is certainly over and above everything, but he addresses us, he listens, he sees us, he speaks, he makes alliances - he is capable of loving.

    The history of salvation is the history of God with men, it is the story of that relationship with a God who revealed himself progressively to man, who made himself be known, who has shown his face.

    At the start of the year, on January 1, we heard in the liturgy that most beautiful prayer of benediction over the people: "The LORD bless you and keep you! The LORD let his face shine upon you, and be gracious to you! The LORD look upon you kindly and give you peace!"
    (Nm 6,24-26).

    The splendor of the divine face is the very fountain of life, it is what allows us to see reality. The light of his face is our guide in life. In the Old Testament, there is a figure to whom the subject of 'the face of God' is linked in a very special way.

    It is Moses, whom God had chosen to liberate his people from slavery in Egypt, to give him the Law of the covenant and lead him to the Promised Land. In Chapter 33 of the Book of Exodus, it is said that Moses had a close and confidential relationship with God: "The LORD used to speak to Moses face to face, as a person speaks to a friend"
    (v 11).

    By virtue of this confidential relationship, Moses asks God: "Show me your glory!", and God's reply is clear: "I will make all my goodness pass before you, and I will proclaim my name 'LORD' before you... But you cannot see my face, for no one can see me and live... Here is a place near me... you may see my back; but my face may not be seen." (vv 18-23).

    Thus, on the one hand, there was the dialog face to face, as between friends, but on the other, there is the impossibility, in this life, of seeing the face of God which remains hidden - our view is limited. The Fathers said that the words "you may see my back" mean - you can only follow Christ, and by following him, you will see from behind the mystery of God - God can be followed seeing his back.

    Something completely new happens, however, with the Incarnation. The search for the face of God takes an unimaginable turn, because now this face can be seen: It is that of Jesus, the Son of God who became man.

    In him is fulfilled the journey of the revelation of God that began with his call to Abraham. He is the fullness of this revelation because he is the Son of God. He is at once "the mediator and fullness of all Revelation"
    (Dei verbum, 2). In him the content of Revelation and Revelation itself coincide.

    Jesus shows us the face of God and makes us know the name of God. In his priestly prayer at the Last Supper, he says to the Father: "I have revealed your name... I made known to them your name"
    (cfr Jn 17,6,26).

    The expression 'name of God' refers to God as he who is among men. To Moses, at the burning bush, God had revealed his name - thus making himself invocable: he gave a concrete sign of his being among men.

    All this finds completion and fullness in Jesus: He inaugurates a new way of God being present in history, because whoever sees him sees God, sees the Father, as he told Philip
    (cfr Jn 14,9).

    Christianity, said St. Bernard, is "the religion of the Word of God", but not of "a written silent word, but of the Word incarnate and alive" (Homily 'super missus est', IV, 11: PL 183, 86B).

    In the patristic and medieval tradition, a special formulation was used to express this reality: that Jesus is the Verbum abbreviatum (cfr Rm 9,28, referring to Is 10,23), - the abbreviated Word, the short word that is substantially the Word of the Father, who has told us everything about himself. In Jesus, the entire Word is present.

    In Jesus, even the mediation between God and man finds its fullness. In the Old Testament, there is a whole line of figures who have carried out this function, especially Moses, the liberator, the guide, the 'mediator' of the covenant, as even the New Testmaent calls him
    (cfr Gal 3,19; Acts 7,35; GJn 1,17).

    Jesus, true God and true man, is not just one of the mediators between God and man, he is the mediator of the new and eternal covenant (cfr Heb 8,6; 9,15; 12,24) ;. St Paul says, "For there is one God. There is also one mediator between God and the human race, Christ Jesus, himself human" (1 Tm 2,5; cfr Gal 3,19-20).

    In him we see and meet the Father. In him, we can call God by the name "Abba, Father". In him, we are given salvation.

    The desire to really know God, namely, to see the face of God, is inherent in every man, even in atheists. Perhaps we have this unconscious desire simply to see who he is, what he is, what he means for us.

    But this desire can be realized by following Christ - we see his back, and we can finally see God as a friend, his face in the face of Christ. What is important is that we follow Christ not just when we need him and when we can find time in our daily occupations, but with all our life as it is.

    All of our existence should be oriented towards meeting Jesus Christ, towards love for him. In which, a central place should be given to loving our neighbor, the love which, in the light of the Crucified One, makes us recognize the face of Jesus in the poor, the weak, the suffering.

    This is possible only if the true face of Jesus has become familiar to us in listening to his Word, in speaking to him interiorly, entering into this Word so that we truly encounter him, and of course, in the mystery of the Eucharist.

    In the Gospel of St. Luke, the account about the two disciples at Emmaus is significant, they who recognized Jesus when he broke the bread, but were prepared by having travelled with him, prepared by their invitation asking him to stay with them, prepared by the dialog that had set their heart on fire. And so, at the end, they saw Jesus.

    Even for us, the Eucharist is the great school at which we learn to see the face of God, in which we enter into an intimate relationship with him. And we learn, at the same time, to fix our gaze on the final moment of the story, when he shall satiate us with the splendor of his face. On earth, we are journeying towards that fullness, in the joyous expectation that the Kingdom of God will truly be realized. Thank you.








    In the audience today was US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who greeted the Holy Father after the audience:


    Today, Mons. Gaenswein was back to the left of the Pope onstage today, yielding the right-hand seat
    to his Regent (#2 man) in the Pontifical Household, Mons. Leonardo Sapienza
    .

    BTW, I apologize for the fuzzy photos - they're the smaller ones, other than those of Panetta with the Pope,
    which were blown up from the RV thumbnails, but which I decided to use anyway because they capture other
    aspects of the audience not seen in the few photos taken by the news agencies, which seemed to focus on
    Mons. Gaensweein more than usual, as if to supplement and make up for the Vanity Fair cover photo.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/01/2013 22:09]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.112
    Post: 8.604
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 03:29



    On Church freedoms, institutional autonomy
    and the Strasbourg court's recent decisions

    Interview with Abp. Dominique Mamberti
    [Secretary for the Holy See’s Relations with States
    Vatican translation from the French service of

    January 16, 2013

    Your Excellency, on 15 January the European Court of Human Rights published its judgments on four cases relating to the freedom of conscience and religion of employees in the United Kingdom. Two of these cases concern employees’ freedom to wear a small cross around their neck in the workplace, while the other two concern the freedom to object in conscience to the celebration of a civil union between persons of the same sex and to conjugal counselling for couples of the same sex. Only in one case the Court held in favor of the applicant.
    These cases show that questions relating to freedom of conscience and religion are complex, in particular in European society marked by the increase of religious diversity and the corresponding hardening of secularism.

    There is a real risk that moral relativism, which imposes itself as a new social norm, will come to undermine the foundations of individual freedom of conscience and religion. The Church seeks to defend individual freedoms of conscience and religion in all circumstances, even in the face of the "dictatorship of relativism".

    To this end, the rationality of the human conscience in general and of the moral action of Christians in particular require explanation. Regarding morally controversial subjects, such as abortion or homosexuality, freedom of conscience must be respected. Rather than being an obstacle to the establishment of a tolerant society in its pluralism, respect for freedom of conscience and religion is a condition for it.

    Addressing the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See last week Pope Benedict XVI stressed that: "In order effectively to safeguard the exercise of religious liberty it is essential to respect the right of conscientious objection. This 'frontier' of liberty touches upon principles of great importance of an ethical and religious character, rooted in the very dignity of the human person. They are, as it were, the 'bearing walls' of any society that wishes to be truly free and democratic. Thus, outlawing individual and institutional conscientious objection in the name of liberty and pluralism paradoxically opens by contrast the door to intolerance and forced uniformity."

    The erosion of freedom of conscience also witnesses to a form of pessimism with regard to the capacity of the human conscience to recognize the good and the true, to the advantage of positive law alone, which tends to monopolize the determination of morality.

    It is also the Church’s role to remind people that every person, no matter what his beliefs, has, by means of his conscience, the natural capacity to distinguish good from evil and that he should act accordingly. Therein lies the source of his true freedom.

    Some time ago the Holy See’s Mission to the Council of Europe published a Note on the Church’s freedom and institutional autonomy. Could you explain the context of the Note?
    The issue of the Church’s freedom in her relations with civil authorities is at present being examined by the European Court of Human Rights in two cases involving the Orthodox Church of Romania and the Catholic Church.

    These are the Sindacatul "Pastorul cel Bun" versus Romania and Fernandez Martinez versus Spain cases. On this occasion the Permanent Representation of the Holy See to the Council of Europe drew up a note to synthesize and explain the magisterium (official Church teaching) on the freedom and institutional autonomy of the Catholic Church.

    What is at stake in these cases?
    In these cases, the European Court must decide whether the civilian power respected the European Convention on Human Rights by the Orthodox Church refusing to recognize a trade union of priests (in the Romanian case) and by the refusal of a school in Spain to reappoint a teacher of religion who publicly professes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church.

    In both cases, the rights to freedom of association and freedom of expression were invoked in order to constrain religious communities to act in a manner contrary to their canonical status and the Magisterium. Thus, these cases call into question the Church’s freedom to function according to her own rules and not to be subject to civil rules other than those necessary to ensure that the common good and just public order are respected.

    The Church has always had to defend herself in order to preserve her autonomy with regard to civilian power and ideologies. Today, an important issue in Western countries is to determine how the dominant culture, strongly marked by materialist individualism and relativism, can understand and respect the nature of the Church, which is a community founded on faith and reason.

    How does the Church understand this situation?
    The Church is aware of the difficulty of determining the relations between the civil authorities and the different religious communities in a pluralist society with regard to the requirements of social cohesion and the common good.

    In this context, the Holy See draws attention to the necessity of maintaining religious freedom in its collective and social dimension. This dimension corresponds to the essentially social nature both of the person and of the religious fact in general.

    The Church does not ask that religious communities be lawless zones but that they be recognized as spaces for freedom, by virtue of the right to religious freedom, while respecting just public order. This teaching is not reserved to the Catholic Church; the criteria derived from it are founded in justice and are therefore of general application.

    Furthermore, the juridical principle of the institutional autonomy of religious communities is widely recognized by States which respect religious freedom, as well as by international law. The European Court of Human Rights itself has regularly stated this principle in several important judgments. Other institutions have also affirmed this principle.

    This is notably the case with the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) and also with the United Nations Committee for Human Rights in, respectively, the Final Document of the Vienna Conference of 19 January 1989 and General Observation No. 22 on the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion of 30 July 1993. It is nevertheless useful to recall and defend this principle of the autonomy of the Church and the civilani power.

    How is this Note set out?
    The Church’s freedom will be better respected if it is, first of all, well understood, without prejudice, by the civil authorities. It is therefore necessary to explain how the Church’s freedom is envisaged.

    To this end, the Permanent Representation of the Holy See to the Council of Europe drew up a synthesizing Note (which is here attached) explaining the Church’s position on the basis of four principles:
    1) the distinction between the Church and the political community;
    2) freedom in relation to the State;
    3) freedom within the Church;
    4) respect for just public order.

    Following the explanation of these principles, the Note also presents the more pertinent extracts from the Declaration on Religious Freedom Dignitatis Humanae and the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes of the Second Vatican Council.





    Note on the Catholic Church’s
    freedom and institutional autonomy

    On the examination by the European Court of Human Rights
    of the Sindacatul "Pastorul cel Bun" versus Romania
    (No. 2330/09)
    and Fernandez Martinez versus Spain (No. 56030/07) cases


    The teaching of the Catholic Church regarding the aspects of religious freedom touched on by the two above-mentioned cases may be presented synthetically as based on the following four principles:
    1) the distinction between the Church and the political community;
    2) freedom in relation to the State;
    3) freedom within the Church; and
    4) respect for just public order.


    1. The distinction between the Church and the political community]
    The Church recognizes the distinction between the Church and the political community, each of which has distinct ends; the Church is in no way confused with the political community and is not bound to any political system. The political community must see to the common good and ensure that citizens can lead a "calm and peaceful life" in this world.

    The Church recognizes that it is in the political community that the most complete realization of the common good is to be found (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1910); this is to be understood as "the sum total of social conditions which allow people, either as groups or individuals, to reach their fulfilment more fully and more easily" (ibid., n. 1906).

    It is the State’s task to defend it and ensure the cohesion, unity and organization of society in order that the common good may be realized with the contribution of all citizens and that the material, cultural, moral and spiritual goods necessary for a truly human existence may be made accessible to everyone.
    The Church, for her part, was founded in order to lead the faithful to their eternal end by means of her teaching, sacraments, prayer and laws.

    This distinction is based on the words of the Lord Jesus Christ: "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s" (Mt 22:21). In their own areas, the political community and the Church are independent of each other and autonomous.

    When it is a question of areas which have both temporal and spiritual ends, such as marriage or the education of children, the Church is of the view that the civilian power should exercise its authority while making sure not to damage the spiritual good of the faithful.

    The Church and the political community, however, cannot ignore one another; from different points of view they are at the service of the same people. They exercise this service all the more effectively for the good of all the more they strive for healthy mutual cooperation, as the Second Vatican Council expressed it (cf. Gaudium et spes, n. 76).

    The distinction between the Church and the political community is ensured by respecting their reciprocal autonomy, which conditions their mutual freedom. The limits of this freedom are, for the State, to refrain from adopting measures which could do harm to the eternal salvation of the faithful, and, for the Church, to respect the public order of the State.

    2. Freedom with respect to the State
    The Church claims no privilege but asks that her freedom to carry out her mission in a pluralist society be fully respected and protected. The Church received this mission and this freedom from Jesus Christ, not from the State.

    The civilian power should thus respect and protect the freedom and autonomy of the Church and in no way prevent her from fully carrying out her mission, which consists in leading the faithful, by her teaching, sacraments, prayers and laws, to their eternal end.

    The Church’s freedom should be recognized by the civilian power with regard to all that concerns her mission, whether it is a matter of the institutional organization of the Church
    - choice and formation of her co-workers and of the clergy,
    - choice of bishops,
    - internal communication between the Holy See, the bishops and faithful,
    - the founding and governing of institutes of religious life,
    - the publication and distribution of written texts,
    - the possession and administration of temporal goods …)
    or the fulfilment of her mission towards the faithful, especially by
    - the exercise of her Magisterium,
    - the celebration of public worship,
    - the administration of the sacraments, and
    - pastoral care).

    The Catholic religion exists in and through the Church, which is the mystical body of Christ. When considering the Church’s freedom, primary attention should therefore be given to her collective dimension: The Church is autonomous in her institutional functioning, juridical order and internal administration.

    With due respect for the imperatives of a just public order, this autonomy should be respected by the civilian authorities; this is a condition of religious freedom and the distinction between Church and State.

    The civilian authorities cannot, without committing an abuse of power, interfere in the purely religious domain, for example, by seeking to change the bishop’s decision regarding appointment to a function.

    3. Freedom within the Church
    The Church is not unaware that certain religions and ideologies can oppress the freedom of their adherents; however, for her part, the Church recognizes the fundamental value of human freedom.

    The Church sees in every human person a creature endowed with intelligence and free will. The Church sees herself as a space for freedom and prescribes norms intended to guarantee that this freedom is respected.

    Thus, all religious acts, for validity, require the freedom of the one carrying them out, that is, the engagement of their will. Taken together and apart from their individual significance, these freely accomplished acts aim at giving access to the "freedom of the children of God". Mutual relations within the Church (such as marriage and religious vows made before God) are governed by this freedom.

    This freedom has a relation of dependence on the truth ("the truth will make you free", Jn 8:32): consequently it cannot be invoked to justify an attack on the truth.

    Thus, a member of the lay faithful or a religious cannot, with regard to the Church, invoke freedom to contest the faith (for example, by adopting public positions against the Magisterium) or to damage the Church (for example, by creating a civilian trade union of priests against the will of the Church).

    It is true that every person is free to contest the Magisterium or the prescriptions and norms of the Church. In case of disagreement, everyone may exercise the recourses provided by canon law and even break off his relations with the Church. Since relations within the Church are, however, essentially spiritual in nature, it is not the State’s role to enter into this area to settle disputes.

    4. Respect for just public order
    The Church does not ask that religious communities be "lawless" areas, where the laws of the State would cease to apply. The Church recognizes the legitimate competence of civilian authorities and jurisdictions to assure the maintenance of public order. This public order should conform to justice.

    Thus, the State should ensure that religious communities respect morality and just public order. In particular, it should see to it that persons are not subject to inhuman or degrading treatment, that their physical and moral integrity is respected, including the possibility of freely leaving their religious community.

    This is where the autonomy of the different religious communities is limited, allowing both individual and collective and institutional religious freedom to be guaranteed, while respecting the common good and the cohesion of pluralist societies.

    Apart from these cases, civilian authorities should respect the autonomy of religious communities, by virtue of which these should be free to function and organize themselves according to their own rules.

    In this regard, it should be borne in mind that the Catholic faith completely respects reason. Christians recognize the distinction between reason and religion, between the natural and supernatural orders, and believe that "grace does not destroy nature", that is to say, that faith and the other gifts of God never render human nature and the use of human reason useless - they do not ignore them, but rather promote and encourage them.

    Christianity, unlike other religions, does not involve formal religious prescriptions (regarding food, vesture, mutilation, etc.) which, were the case to arise, could offend against natural morality and enter into conflict with the law of a religiously neutral State.

    In any case, Christ taught us to go beyond such purely formal religious prescriptions and replaced them by the living law of charity, a law which, in the natural order, recognizes that conscience has the task of distinguishing between good and evil. Thus, the Catholic Church could not impose any prescription contrary to the just requirements of public order.


    What an excellent summary of the Magisterium regarding relations between the Church and civilian authorities! It's the kind of 'talking points' one must commit to heart if one is to reason the issues out with outsiders or critics.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 17/01/2013 04:59]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.113
    Post: 8.605
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 14:31


    I know it's trivial and rather juvenile, but it's also 'news'...

    Fallout from Vanity Fair



    Usually only celebrities and models grace the covers of the world's most famous fashion and style publications, but the Italian edition of Vanity Fair is bucking that tradition and doing something that has never been done before. It put a clergyman on the latest cover.

    Archbishop Georg Ganswein, who is Pope Benedict XVI's private secretary, is on the current issue of Italian Vanity Fair. For years the archbishop has been dubbed "Gorgeous George" by the Italian media, and designer Donatella Versace even created a fashion line that was inspired by him. He's no longer being talked about just in fashion circles, because now people the world over will know his name, because he's officially a cover model--just not on purpose.

    The 56-year-old appears on the magazine cover with the headline, "Father Georg--It's Not a Sin to Be Beautiful." Vanity Fair also describes the archbishop as the "George Clooney of St. Peters." The magazine does divulge that "Gorgeous George" did not pose for the cover photograph. An existing image was used for the cover.

    The reason the magazine decided to feature the archbishop: Ganswein was recently promoted to the role of archbishop earlier in the month and elevated to Prefect of the Pontifical Household. As prefect, he arranges the pope's daily schedule and decides who has access to the pope.

    So Archbishop Ganswein is making history as the first clergyman to appear on the cover of Vanity Fair. [Sorry, Ms. Knowles, B16 was the first - not just any clergyman, but a Pope no less!] A spokesperson for the magazine said, "He is such an interesting person, we decided to put him on the cover."

    If you're eager to get your hands on the magazine, it's on newsstands today.

    "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity" is how the Book of Ecclesiastes begins - in which the word vanity is used in its most common abstract senses: a narcissistic feeling of superiority, an excessive indulging in worldly pleasures, as well as the ultimate futility of such indulgences. Mons. Georg Gaenswein has more reason than most to keep this in mind these days, and unless he is a saint in the making - or someone who, as Cervantes said, knows himself well enough to preserve him from vanity - just imagine what sins of pride (not that he asked for all this!) he might be telling his confessor these days...

    Another story places things in better context than the simple celebration of celebrity....


    Vanity Fair:
    The Pope's secretary as cover boy

    By Nick Pisa

    January 17, 2013

    NB: The same story appears in the UK's Daily Mail, for which Pisa is the Vatican correspondent, with the more tabloidy headline: "Lead us not into temptation, Archbishop!"

    It's usually Hollywood stars or models who grace the cover of Vanity Fair, but in a break from tradition the Italian edition of the magazine has come out with a full page portrait of Pope Benedict's private secretary.

    Archbishop Georg Ganswein, 56, who has been dubbed "Gorgeous George" by the Italian media, has been the Pope's righthand man for more than six years and is always at his side.

    The soft-spoken clergyman, who is also a pilot, likes to keep fit by playing tennis and is often pictured in glossy magazines because of his rugged good looks. Some have even compared him with actor George Clooney. [Obviously, there is no physical resemblance, only that they are both good-looking in their own way.]

    Archbishop Ganswein has given a handful of interviews, but is on the whole a private man - although there was a media frenzy recently after he was snapped late at night walking close to the Vatican with a mystery woman.

    He was pictured on the cover of the latest issue of Vanity Fair alongside the headline ''Being beautiful is not a sin'', adding that he was a ''particular'' clergyman and describing him as the ''George Clooney of the Vatican".

    Archbishop Ganswein's main role is to organise Pope Benedict's day-to-day diary.

    He was recently in the spotlight over the Vatileaks scandal when it emerged he had angered senior Catholic Church figures because of the media's interest in him.

    However he has insisted his mind is fully on the job and recently said: ''Personally I see my role or service with the Pope as similar to that of a glass window. The cleaner it is, the better it will achieve its task. I need to let the sunlight in - the less you see of the glass then the better it is. If you don't see it at all that means I'm doing my job well.''

    During one of his earliest interviews (with Vatican Radio_, he was asked about his good looks, and how he dealt with women. He said: ''I have never had trouble with the so called fairer sex, I have always had a very serene and natural relationship with women. Of course in my youth there were women who I would happily see, and there were others I was even happier to see.''

    He added: ''The Italian newspapers started this off [the attention to his looks] and they wrote very complimentary pieces about me.bAt first it surprised me, and to be honest I also found it irritating. I didn't know what to do - should I say something or should I ignore it? I decided to ignore it and now with time I have got used to it. The risk is that by just judging a person superficially you don't really find out what they are like inside.''

    A spokeswoman for Vanity Fair said of the article: ''It is just a close-up profile of Archbishop Ganswein. He did not pose for the photograph and he didn't give an interview, but he is such a interesting person we decided to put him on the cover".

    "It's the first time a clergyman has been on the front of our magazine, which is normally reserved for high-profile celebrities."

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 17/01/2013 16:38]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.114
    Post: 8.606
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 15:36


    Thanks to Aqua who passed on this item which the author has circulated in his newsletter as well... It's a mixed bag, to say the least.

    Top Ten People of 2012
    and our 'Man of the Year'

    by Robert Moynihan
    Editor


    Each year, Inside the Vatican magazine selects 10 people from around the world whom we feel are worthy of praise for their courage, their steadiness under difficulties, their fidelity to the Church and to the faith, their holiness.

    This year, we decided to focus more than usual on the Holy See and the leadership of the Church in Rome and in other places, because it seemed to us that 2012 was in some ways an “annus horribilis" (year of horrors) for the Church, when the Church’s central government was brought into serious question by the Vatileaks scandal. At the center of it all was Pope Benedict, betrayed by his own butler. [I beg to disagree most vehemently - Moynihan simply buys into the entire MSM narrative about Vatileaks (that has also shaped the public opinion about it) , when Moynihan, who is supposed to be a 'Vatican insider', should know better and have his own independent judgment, and if he thinks as the herd does, then that's his loss. It was not the Church's central government that was brought into question (nothing disclosed in Vatileaks amounted to anything major, especially compared to other previous and genuine scandals in the Vatican like the Banco Ambrosiano fiasco), and all the power plays and bureaucratic ineptitude of the Curia that were highlighted in some of the purloined papers were no news at all.

    The scandal was that the otherwise routine procedure of safeguarding the Pope's private documents was breached, not just by anyone but by a traitor who happened to be uniquely situated to carry out the crime. There are Judases everywhere, but a Pope does not deserve - or expect - to have his own valet to be one.... And as far as 'annus horribilis' goes, surely the direct attacks against Benedict XVI himself in 2010 - of a number and variety of ingenious ways to somehow brand him personally with the stigma of the sex-abuse scandals everywhere - were far more 'horribilis' than the media's unseemly and almost salacious obsession with what was essentially petty gossip purveyed by sanctimonious opportunists like Gabriele and Nuzzi, whose generic accusations of 'evil and corruption everywhere in the Vatican' was gloatingly perpetrated, irresponsibly one must say, by the unthinking media without even any attempt at fact-checking..]
    _

    Some thought we should name the Pope as our “Man of the Year” because he has come through it all with “flying colors" [unscathed, more importantly, because nothing that was revealed was negative for him at all!], continuing to teach and preach in an astonishingly effective and profound way for those who have “ears to hear,” finishing his third book on Jesus, naming young and energetic new cardinals from around the world, traveling to Mexico and Cuba and Lebanon, launching the Year of Faith...

    No Pope has ever been listed among our “Top Ten” because, in a sense, we have taken it for granted that the Pope is inevitably at the center of the struggle for the faith in the world today. That was true during the years when John Paul II was Pope, and it has been true during Benedict’s nearly 8-year pontificate.

    But in the past year, Benedict has taken very serious blows — above all, his butler’s betrayal of his trust.

    This not only brought sorrow to the Pope, it threatened to destabilize the government of the universal Church (what bishop would not think twice about communicating with Rome knowing his communications might be published worldwide?). [That is such a facile but specious argument, and again, one that is in every sense of the word, vulgar (i.e., common and popular, in the pejorative sense of those words) and ill-considered! People will continue to communicate to the Pope what they feel they have to, when what they have to say is far more imnportant for the Church than their fear of being 'outed'.]

    The “Vatileaks” scandal rocked the Barque of Peter in 2012 in a way that threatened to puncture large holes in the hull of the boat. [Oh please, stop being Chicken Little, Mr. Moynihan! The boat would have sunk by now if that had been the case. Puncturing the image is not the same as puncturing the institution itself, even if these days, image is supreme, and no one - including Mr. Moynihan - appears to be interested in the essential reality.]

    Now that storm has subsided, and the Pope has battened down the hatches for the final phase of his pontificate. [If the boar had been so full of holes, you don't remedy it simply by battening down the hutches. Watch your metaphors, Mr. Moynihan, and try to be consistent. If all the Pope had to was 'batten down the hutches', which he has, then the boat was not ridden with all those large holes you ascribe to it.] He has begun to preach even more eloquently about the great issues facing mankind in every age, but especially in our own time.

    For steering the Church through this crisis, for continuing to keep up a grueling schedule which would exhaust most men half his age, for preaching the Gospel “in season and out of season,” Pope Benedict XVI is our choice for “Man of the Year” in 2012.

    But the Pope is not the only one who is fighting to keep the Church on course, preaching, doing works of mercy, bearing witness to Christ. There are many others, and we have chosen ten of them.

    In China, the bishop of Shanghai is a figure of enormous bravery and fidelity to Rome in spite of fear and oppression. Gerry O’Connell, our expert on Asian Church affairs, has given us a profile of Bishop Thaddeus Ma Daqin.

    In Rome, there is a Spanish cardinal, a theologian so in line with the thought of Pope Benedict that he is called “little Ratzinger” (he is also shorter than the Pope) who has now stepped out in support of the old Mass, or rather, the “eternal Mass,” as one of our letter-writers in this issue persuasively argues. He is Cardinal Antonio Cañizares.

    And in Rome there is right now one person whom the Pope trusts more than anyone else, someone who prays the rosary with him daily and who works with him from dawn to dusk and far into the night: his German private secretary, the new prefect of the Pontifical Household, Archbishop Georg Gän­swein.

    In the Middle East, where the Christian community is under such pressure, a cardinal from Lebanon is the incarnation of the Pope’s concern for the plight of the Christians of that region. He is the leader of the ancient Maronite Church, an Eastern-rite Church, so he also represents the universality of the Church. He is Patriarch Bechera Boutros Rai.

    In Africa, a new cardinal, from Nigeria, is fighting daily for his people against the pressure of militant Islam. He is a peacemaker, seeking ways to promote dialogue and understanding. This brave man is Cardinal John Olurunfemi Onaiyekan.

    In Asia, in Pakistan, there is a woman who has been in prison for three years due to false charges of blasphemy. This “prisoner of faith” is the mother of five children. Her name is Asia Bibi. [ who represents so many other emblematic female figures of that region, like the Pakistani girls Risah and Malala.]

    In the United States, no voice in the past year has been more prominent than that of the cardinal archbishop of New York in speaking out against government infringements of religious freedom. He is Cardinal Timothy Dolan.

    In Europe, a Church leader in France is building a coalition for traditional values that is completely unexpected, given France’s secular nature. He is the cardinal archbishop of Paris, André Vingt-Trois.

    All over the world, mothers and fathers sacrifice themselves daily for their children, but one Spanish woman sacrificed her life: she chose not to have chemotherapy to treat a cancer while pregnant, and died that her child might live. Her name: Barbara Castro Garcia.

    Finally, there is one of the key assistants to Cardinal Ratzinger from his years at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, a man who, under the Pope’s orders, has courageously toiled to “purify the Church” by investigating cases of priestly sexual abuse. This courageous man is Bishop Charles Scicluna of Malta.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 13:58]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.115
    Post: 8.607
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 17:03


    Good to see that today, the Vatican website finally updated the seasonal banner on its homepage from 'Christmas 2012'.

    Thursday, January 17, First Week in Ordinary Time

    Illustration, second from Left: The Torment of St. Anthony, Michelangelo. 1487.
    ST. ANTHONY THE GREAT (Anthony Abbot) (Egypt, 251-356)
    Coptic monk and abbot, Father of Monasticism
    Just as St. Jerome wrote the biography of Anthony's great contemporary, St. Paul the Hermit, St. Athanasius wrote Anthony's,
    which led to spreading the concept of monasticism in Europe. Born to wealthy parents, he decided at age 34 to give up all his
    wealth and live an ascetic life. He was the first to do this in the wilderness, spending 13 years in the desert the first time
    around. He would return to such solitude in later periods of his life, once as long as 20 years, where he was said to have
    fought monumental battles with the devil. The 'temptations of St. Anthony' became the subject for many paintings through the
    centuries. With his reputation for prayer and personal mortification, he attracted many people to him for spiritual healing and
    guidance. At age 54, he founded a monastery for which he drew rules based on 'ora et labora' anticipating the famous Rule of
    Benedict of Norcia centuries later. In his 70s, Athanasius enlisted him to defend the faith against the Arian heresy. He
    attended the First Ecumenical Council at Nicea in 325 A.D. to present this defense. He visited Paul the Hermit one year before
    the latter's death, and buried him later. He himself died at age 105 in his beloved monastery (still an active one, it is located
    in the Eastern Desert of Egypt, about 100 miles southeast of Cairo; extreme right photo in the panel).

    Readings for today's Mass: www.usccb.org/bible/readings/011713.cfm


    AT THE VATICAN TODAY

    The Holy Father met with

    - Six bishops from Italy's Abruzzo and Molise regions (Group 2) on ad-limina visit

    - An ecumenical delegation from Finland on their annual visit to Rome th mark the feast of St. Henrik,
    their national patron. Address in English.
    [St. Henrik (Henry) was a 12th century English priest reputed to have come to Finland with King Eric of Sweden (also a saint) to re-evangelize Finland. After a successful campaign, Eric returned to Sweden, but Henry stayed on in Finland where he continued to preach the Gospel. Tradition has it that he was killed by a murderer to whom he had administered a canonical punishment. After his death, he gained fame for miraculous deeds, and his feastday has been observed in Finland and Sweden since the 13th century. Originally it was January 20 but in modern times, it has been January 19. Finland today is, of course, mostly Lutheran, so I suppose the annual St. Henrik's pilgrimage to Rome is an acknowledgment of how Catholcs re-evangelized medieval Finland, even though Finland went on to become one of the earliest nations to get aboard the Reformation bandwagon.]



    - Italy's Il Messaggero reports today that papal traitor and confessed thief Paolo Gabriele will soon be employed by the Bambin Gesu pediatric hospital in Rome (as what, we are not told) in its most modern facility near St. Paul-outside-the-Walls, inaugurated last October by Cardinal Bertone. This facility now houses what is considered to be Europe's most advanced center for pediatric research.

    Part of the verdict against Gabriele was that he could not be employed again within Vatican city-state, but the Bambin Gesu is a Vatican institution that enjoys the privilege of extra=territoriality (established in 1869 by a philanthropic family, it was donated to the Holy See in 1924), and irony of ironies, Cardinal Bertone has been its greatest supporter since he came to Rome.

    According to Italian media reports, when he became Secretary of State, Bertone 'drained' some of the leading administrators and doctors from the Gaslini pediatric hospital in Genoa - which is ranked with the Bambin Gesu as one of Italy's top pediatric centers - to work for Bambin Gesu_ (to the great chagrin of Cardinal Bagnasco, who as Archbishop of Genoa, is ex-officio president of the Gaslini)...

    So now, Mr Gabriele, the hands you bit so predatorily are the very ones who are feeding you again - the Pope you betrayed so heartlessly, and the prime target of your shotgun accusations!

    Also, Gabriele and his family will have to move out of their apartment within Vatican walls, which will now be occupied by the current papal valet, Sandro Mariotti, and his family.


    - PewSitter's current line-up of anti-Christian events around the world:

    o Bishop in Mali says people in hiding, afraid to enter churches

    o Coptic Christians fleeing Egypt as Islamic extremism rises

    o Christian girls harassed on Egypt's streets

    o Entire Egyptian family sentenced to 15 years in jail for using Christian names

    o Indonesia: six Catholic schools could be shut down for not teaching Islam

    o Pakistan: Man gets ten years prison for misquoting a hadith
    [Muslims punishing one of their own! A hadith is said to be "a saying or an act of tacit approval or disapproval ascribed either validly or invalidly to Mohammed". Imagine the tens of thousands of Catholics - starting with bishops and priests - who could be imprisoned if the Church had the same attitude towards those who misquote the Magiterium (and Scriptures) for self-serving purpose!]

    o Christian women in India assaulted for worshiping

    And in the category of eyebrow-raiser:

    o India's Church leaders see sex-education as answer to violence against women?
    Perhaps this deserves further reporting...


    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/01/2013 00:59]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.116
    Post: 8.608
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 19:14



    Very unseemly, but one can no longer be surprised by the elementary errors habitually committed by the Vatican Press Office - which in its bulletin on this event, 1) mis-identifies the delegation as a 'Finnish Lutheran delegation', as it did last year (see Page 270 of this thread) and 2) does not even mention the name of the delegation leader, let alone its members (it's never a big delegation), which includes the Catholic Archbishop of Helsinki, who is the 'Eminence' addressed by the Pope in his salutation. He is Mons. Teemu Sippo, S.C.I., the first ethnic Finn to hold the office since the diocese was re-established after the Reformation.

    It is unpardonably wrong to identify the ecumenical delegation that includes a Catholic Archbishop, as a 'Lutheran delegation'. And it is rude, as well as a breach of protocol, especially on this Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, to treat the delegation as a nameless mass, since they represent the leaders of the major Christian confessions in Finland, including the Catholic Church. And this is a yearly event - it's not happening for the first time.[


    Benedict XVI meets ecumenical
    delegation from Finland


    January 17, 2013



    At 12 noon today, the Holy Father received in audience an ecumenical delegation from the Lutheran Church of Finland [sic, in Italian] on the occasion of their annual pilgrimage to Rome to celebrate the Feast of St. Henrik, patron of Finland.

    Here is the text of the Pope's address to the delegation:

    Your Eminence,
    Your Excellencies,
    Dear Friends,

    Once again I am happy to welcome your Ecumenical Delegation on its annual visit to Rome for the feast of Saint Henrik, the patron saint of Finland. It is fitting that our meeting takes place on the eve of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, whose theme this year is drawn from the Book of the Prophet Micah: "What does God require of us?" (cf.Mic 6:6-8).

    The Prophet makes clear, of course, what the Lord requires of us: it is "to do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with our God" (v. 8). The Christmas season which we have just celebrated reminds us that it is God who from the beginning has walked with us, and who, in the fullness of time, took flesh in order to save us from our sins and to guide our steps in the way of holiness, justice and peace.

    Walking humbly in the presence of the Lord, in obedience to his saving word and with trust in his gracious plan, serves as an eloquent image not only of the life of faith, but also of our ecumenical journey on the path towards the full and visible unity of all Christians.

    On this path of discipleship, we are called to advance together along the narrow road of fidelity to God’s sovereign will in facing whatever difficulties or obstacles we may eventually encounter.

    To advance in the ways of ecumenical communion thus demands that we become ever more united in prayer, ever more committed to the pursuit of holiness, and ever more engaged in the areas of theological research and cooperation in the service of a just and fraternal society.

    Along this way of spiritual ecumenism, we truly walk with God and with one another in justice and love (cf. Mic 6:8), for, as the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification affirms: "We are accepted by God and receive the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works"
    (No. 15).

    Dear friends, it is my hope that your visit to Rome will help to strengthen ecumenical relations between all Christians in Finland.

    Let us thank God for all that has been achieved so far and let us pray that the Spirit of truth will guide Christ’s followers in your country towards ever greater love and unity as they strive to live in the light of the Gospel and to bring that light to the great moral issues facing our societies today.

    By walking together in humility along the path of justice, mercy and righteousness which the Lord has pointed out to us, Christians will not only dwell in the truth, but also be beacons of joy and hope to all those who are looking for a sure point of reference in our rapidly changing world.

    At the beginning of this New Year, I assure you of my closeness in prayer. Upon all of you I cordially invoke the wisdom, grace and peace of Jesus Christ our Redeemer.



    Information about the FEC, including its member churches, observer churches and associate organizations may be found on
    ]http://www.ekumenia.fi/briefly_in_english/


    With instant access to information, and therefore instant fact-checking, now made possible by the Internet, there is no excuse for any information agency or outlet to make elementary errors of commission or omission in reporting facts. One must assume the superiors at the Vatican communications offices are not even aware of these mistakes, or they would not be happening so frequently and egregiously. This apparent lack of supervisory interest and exercise is unacceptable under any circumstances, and unforgivable for those who are in charge of Vatican communications.

    Remember this time last year when the MSM raised an outcry because the Vatican Press Office released Wikipedia biographies of the new cardinals announced by the Pope for the February 2012 consistory? Fr. Lombardi's excuse was that his office did not have time to prepare the data themselves - a) Could they not have asked the Congregation for Bishops which ought to have had all the biodata they need?; and b) Assuming the staff just wanted to take the easy way out, shouldn't their superiors have been aware of it and issued the necessary warning that "These data are taken from Wikipedia"? Granted, Fr. Lombardi has too many things on his plate, but surely, he has subordinates who should be looking out for these problems. It looks as if they are all just as complacent, and frankly derelict, in their duties, if not outright irresponsible.

    Not to be sanctimonious, but insofar as my personal responsibility goes, although this is just an informal forum, I try my best to check out facts before I pass them on, and I am sure I am not 100% successful, but I do my best, and constantly expect to be corrected promptly by the followers of the Forum - it has happened occasionally, for which I am truly grateful - if I am in error. Anyone purveying information must have, at the minimum, an elementary sense of respect for the facts. It is truly troubling that there seem to be too many literal 'numb skulls' having a hand in Vatican communications.



    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 21:11]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.117
    Post: 8.609
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 17/01/2013 21:45


    The Pope's brother marked
    his 89th birthday in Regensburg


    I had been hoping the Vatican might release at least one photo of Mons. Ratzinger marking his 89th birthdya on January 15, but since a new image search today yielded nothing of the sort, I searched German sources only, and to my great surprise, found a full story and 12 photos in the Mittelbayerischer. It turns out Mons. Ratzinger celebrated his 89th in Regensburg, not at the Vatican, as I had mistakenly assumed because in previous years he stayed for his New Year visit to his brother up to his birthday. I'll translate the account later, but he had a lot of visitors (the second picture shows one group of them)...




    I must thank Lella for calling attention on her blog to the link on the blogsite Cantuale Antonianum to an Ignatius Press video done in 2011 to promote Mons. Georg's book My Brother, the Pope
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG_9A6PEvzc&feature=player_embedded


    I wasn't even aware the video existed - in which Mons. Georg answers questions posed to him in a 2008 interview, and he lets out bits of relevant information we didn't know before. The video provides running subtitles of the English translation of what he says, but you can also hear him very well. As we know from previous audio excerpts of him, the monsignor, like his brother, speaks fluidly off the cuff, with no er's or um's... Enjoy the video!

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 17/01/2013 21:47]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.118
    Post: 8.610
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 00:35


    The Vatican is preparing a manual
    to help priests say Mass properly

    by H. Sergio Mora


    ROME, January 16, 2013 (Zenit.org) - The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments is preparing a booklet to help priests celebrate the Mass properly and the faithful to participate better, according to the prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments.

    Cardinal Antonio Cañizares confirmed this Tuesday at an address at the Spanish Embassy to the Holy See on "Catholic Liturgy since Vatican II: Continuity and Evolution."

    "We are preparing it; it will help to celebrate well and to participate well. I hope it will come out this year, in the summer," the cardinal told ZENIT.

    During his talk the cardinal reiterated the importance Vatican II gave to the liturgy, "whose renewal must be understood in continuity with the Tradition of the Church and not as a break or discontinuity." A break either because of innovations that do not respect continuity or because of an immobility that freezes everything at the time of Pius XII, he said.

    In particular, Cardinal Cañizares stressed the importance that Sacrosanctum Concilium gave to liturgy, through which "the work of our Redemption is exercised, above all in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist," adding that "God wants to be adored in a concrete way and it's not up to us to change it."

    [A statement like that - 'God wants to be adored' - makes me queasy! Did God ever ask man explicitly to adore him? Of course, it is implicit in the First Commandment: "...Thou shall not have strange gods before me" (i.e., 'other than me'). But the Lord's Prayer does not order it. I looked up a Catholic online guide which says Jesus summed up man's duty to God, thus: as "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind." (Mt 22:37);(Luke adds "...and with all your strength.") IMHO, man's adoration of God is the natural consequence - one that does not have to be ordered - of believing in him as 'the Father almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth', and being so, he deserves the best that man can offer, in thought, word and deed, including the act of worship, liturgy.]

    The cardinal said that there is talk of a renewed Church, which must not be understood as a mere reform of structures, but as a change starting with the liturgy, because it is from the liturgy that the work of our salvation is effected.

    When speaking of the liturgy, continued the cardinal, one must not forget that the conciliar document states: "Christ is always present in his Church, especially in the liturgical action. He is present in the sacrifice of the Mass, be it in the person of the minister, 'offering himself now through the ministry of the priests as he then offered himself on the cross,' be it especially under the Eucharistic species."

    He stressed that the objective of the liturgy "is the adoration of God and the salvation of men," and that the liturgy is not a creation of ours. [Not having seen the cardinal's text, I don't know exactly what he said. But, yes, liturgy is human creation, except that, until Vatican=II, it was derived and grew organically from the worship traditions of the Church, and was not imposed overnight on the universal Church as a readymade formula that took just several months to devise! Nonetheless, the Novus Ordo is historical reality, so, imperfect and flawed as it is, we must do the best we can with it, as Benedict XVI constantly demonstrates.]

    The prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments criticized existing abuses such as showmanship, and praised moments of silence "that are action," which enable the priest and the faithful to talk with Jesus Christ and which exclude the predominance of words that often becomes showmanship on the part of the priest. The correct attitude is the one "indicated by Saint John the Baptist, when he says he must decrease and the Messiah must increase."

    The cardinal criticized efforts to make the Mass "entertaining" with song and dance, instead of focusing on the mystery of the Eucharist, and said these were attempts to overcome "boredom" by transforming the Mass into a show.

    He added that the Council did not decree that the priest must celebrate Mass facing the people, but that Sacrosanctum concilium stressed the importance of Christ on the altar.

    Asked by the ambassador of Panama to the Holy See about the action of native cultures in the liturgy, the cardinal specified that "the Council speaks of inculturation of the liturgy," respecting "the legitimate varieties" without affecting the principles.

    He recalled his experience on Palm Sunday in Santa Fe, Spain, when he attended a gypsy Mass in which a youth sang the Agnus Dei with an instrument used in flamenco singing - he called it "a real groan from the soul," which "moved everyone and brought the whole assembly to participate."

    He also referred to the fact that in many churches the Most Blessed Sacrament is placed in a side altar or chapel, so that "the tabernacle disappears." [Can you imagine a Jewish synagogue putting its Holy of Holies off to one side that people have to look for it? But progressivist Catholic priests and bishops think so little of the tabernacle and what it means that it was one of the first things they got rid of, along with the main altar and communion rails!]

    Regarding the case of the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who founded the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, the cardinal said that Benedict XVI offered them a healing measure, but his followers have turned him down. "To think that Tradition stops with Pious XII is also a break in the tradition of the Church," he noted.


    This item reminds me that I failed completely to post or even note a most interesting development observed by the followers of Father Z's blog, at the most recent Christmas Eve Mass celebrated by Benedict XVI, though I had flagged the item for posting. I was hitting myself on the head even, because I watched that Mass twice and never paid attention when Communion was being given to the general public. Mea culpa, and better late than never for the following - it is also very apropos to the above news item:

    Papal midnight Mass with
    no communion in the hand


    December 24, 2012

    ...Among them was this email from a priest in Rome:

    In a change from former practice, those distributing Holy Communion at the Holy Father’s Mass tonight were told that "at all Papal Masses, Communion is to be given only on the tongue." The usual statement that Prelates receive in the same way as the Laity remained...

    One e-mail was from a layman who watched the Mass:

    Did you notice that during the communion of the faithful during Pope Benedict’s Midnight Mass at least one priest refused to give Holy Communion on the hand? Instead, the security guard near this priest motioned for each communicant to receive on the tongue. If the communicants didn’t get the hint, the priest still did not give them the Host in the hand, but rather held It near their mouth until they finally understood. Some of the people looked very surprised when they held their hands out and didn’t get the Host.

    Well, after eight years of setting the example very conspicuously and most people still don't get it, even if they are attending Mass at St. Peter's, it's obviously time to spell it out. I wonder what Cardinal Canizares's booklet will say about this... Frankly, I never could figure out why on earth anyone ever thought of such an awkward, time-wasting and ultimately meaningless gesture as 'communion in the hand'.



    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 21:13]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.119
    Post: 8.611
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 01:40

    This week's reflection from my 'adopted' parish priest. I live 40 street blocks away on the West Side of Manhattan from Fr. Rutler's church in the East Side, but I attend his church, which offers the traditional Mass every Sunday at 9 a.m. Fr. Rutler had been an Episcopal priest for nine years when he converted to Catholicism in 1980, and went on to theology degrees at the Gregorian and Angelicum universities in Rome, Oxford Unviersity and the Institut Catholique de Paris.

    Another belated post, but what it says is timeless...

    How narcissism creates
    little anti-Christs

    Weekly Column by
    REV. FR. GEORGE RUTLER, Pastor
    January 13, 2013

    While St. John the Evangelist was still alive, there was already a Gnostic heresy that separated the human Jesus from the divine Christ. It supposed that the man Jesus was given divine power at his baptism (one form of this mistake is called “Adoptionism”), but that this power left him on the cross.

    The Gnostics could not accept that God would have anything to do with physical matter, which they thought was intrinsically evil. One of these heretics was Cerinthus, an Egyptian who made his way to Ephesus in Turkey. St. John was living there and fled from a building when Cerinthus entered, for fear that the roof might fall in.

    This explains the urgency with which St. John writes his letters. He is the only New Testament writer to use the term “AntiChrist” (1 John 2:18, 2:22, 4:3, and 2 John 1:7), although St. Paul speaks of a “son of perdition” (2 Thessalonians: 2:3-4).

    It certainly would be wrong to claim to know who he will be (or, to be gender neutral: who he or she will be), but this devastating being will have seductive power to enlist followers, will hate the Church, will destroy innocent lives, especially infants, and will claim to be greater than God.

    St. John says that the AntiChrist already is at work in the world, so anyone who cooperates with him is in one way or another a lesser AntiChrist. The essence of the AntiChrist is deceit. AntiChristianity calls good evil and evil good, and inverts the natural order, taking pleasure only in disorder and perversion. “Every spirit which does not confess Jesus is not of God” (John 4:2-3).

    Trying to see the truth of God is like “looking into a cloudy mirror” (1 Corinthians 13:12), but at least we “seek his face” (Psalm 27:8). The AntiChrist would have us seek our own face. This narcissism is his cunning deceit, and it has infected our culture.

    Results of the American Freshman Survey, to which more than nine million young people have responded since 1966, show that a growing number of them are “convinced of their own greatness whether or not they have accomplished anything.”

    Along with a 30 per cent increase in narcissistic attitudes since 1979, there is a decline in study, work habits, and the ability to communicate with others. Not surprisingly: “These young egotists can grow up to be depressed adults.”

    The cult of “self-esteem” foisted on young people in their schools is not a modern invention. The Prince of Lies told the very first man and woman: “You shall be like God” (Genesis 3:5).

    False pride is the alchemy for creating little AntiChrists. It was out of love that St. John wrote: “But we are children of God, and those who know God listen to us; those who are not of God refuse to listen to us” (1 John 4:6).

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/01/2013 07:53]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.120
    Post: 8.612
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 05:25


    I suspect this move will bring out many more Latin lovers and practitioners than one might expect...

    'Benedicti breviloquentis'
    And now, the Pope
    to tweet in Latin

    by Silvia Guidi
    Translated from the 1/18/13 issue of


    Benedict XVI's first tweet in Latin will be posted on Sunday, January 20, but just two hours after the news was first released, there were already 700 followers.

    "Tuus adventus in paginam publicam Summi Pontificis Benedicti XVI breviloquentis optatissimus est. Ex Civitate Vaticana" (Your coming to the official Twitter page of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI is most gratifying. From Vatican City)

    The new Twitter account in Latin is Benedictus pp. XVI @Pontifex_ln.

    Fr. Roberto Spataro, vice president of the recently established Pontificia Accademis di Latinita, explains the term 'breviloquium' [which means 'conciseness'. literally 'briefly speaking] briefly'] chosen to translate 'Twitter' to Latin: "Obviously, it is not a literal translation, but it expresses well the medium's characteristics. Besides, it also recalls the title of St. Bonaventure's first work, Breviloquium, in which he describes reality as 'a symphony by God'."

    Manlio Siomnetti, the Italian patristics scholar who won one of the first three Ratzinger Prizes in theology in 2011, told L'Osservatore Romano: "I cannot be an objective and disinterested observer because I approve of everything that will promote Latin. It is a language that adapts itself very well to the brevity demanded by the new social networks, much more than English".

    Fr. Spadaro points out that "Twitter demands rapid communication. If I say in English, 'The corruption of the best people is horrible', I can say the same thing in Latin using three words only: 'Corruptio optimi pessima'. It is a language that helps one to think with precision and moderation. And it has produced an exceptional patrimony in science, knowledge, and faith".

    I am ashamed I have not made any progress in my Latin self-study at all, my only formal exposure having been 'Latin for medical and pharmacy students' in college. I now have Wheelock's Latin: The Classic Introductory Latin Course, which is an excellent teaching aid, but I have not found the discipline to make time for him, even if it is only 30 minutes a day. But I have found that's not enough time to really learn a new declension (I'm stuck at the third declension of nouns and adjectives - there are five such declensions, that have to be learned in six cases, and in singular and plural forms; and have only tackled the first of five verb conjugations). But it has been a useful exercise to try and figure out the meaning of the Latin passages one occasionally comes across in writings about the Church, when they are not translated within the text - by consulting a Latin dictionary, as well as the declension and conjugation charts! And I thought German was a major challenge already!
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.121
    Post: 8.613
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 07:12

    Banner of the Jubilee website of the City of Nis

    Christian Jubilee Year marking
    Constantine's Edict of Milan begins
    in Nis, his Serbian birthplace

    by Nemanja Cabric


    BELGRADE, January 17 - A year-long celebration marking 1,700 years since the Roman Empire granted Christians religious freedom starts today in the Serbian city of Nis, where Roman emperor Constantine the Great was born.

    The whole year of 2013 in Nis will be dedicated to the Edict of Milan, a proclamation giving Christianity equal status with other religions in the Roman Empire, led at the time by Constantine the Great.

    Nis will thus join the cities of Milan (Italy), York (United Kingdom) and Treves (France) as the key cultural heritage sites connected to Constantine, Rome’s first Christian emperor.

    On the opening day of the celebrations a concert of spiritual music performed by the choir of Sretenjski Monastery from Russia wzas to be held at the National Theatre in Nis in the presence of Serbian Orthodox Patriarch Irinej and President Tomislav Nikolic.

    Festivities will last until the end of October 2013 and will include both Catholic and Orthodox liturgies, cultural events, lectures and scientific seminars.

    The Edict of Milan, which was issued in 313 AD, will be discussed by scientists as well as students and schoolchildren. On June 3rd, known in the Orthodox Church calendar as the Day of the Holy Emperor Constantine, awards for tolerance will be presented.

    Constantine’s residence, Mediana, and the Ottoman ‘Skull Tower’ (Celekula), as well as the fortress that dominates the old town of Nis, will feature among the highlights for the growing number of tourists expected in the city.

    It’s expected that more than 100,000 believers will join the liturgy to be held by the Catholic Church on September 21st. Because of the large numbers, the organisers are considering whether it might be possible to hold it on the runway of Nis’s Constantine the Great Airport.

    It's hard to give a concise history that places the Edict of Milan in the right and total context - or the figure of Donstantine the Great, for that matter = and the best I can do for now is to consolidate previous posts I have made about it that barely skim the scope and significance of Constantine's edict...




    Constantine's story is inseparably linked to his mother, the Empress Helena, whose efforts led to the discovery of the tomb where Jesus was believed to have been buried (over which the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built) and who brought back relics of the True Cross and, Tradition says, the Holy Robe of Christ, from the Holy Land to Europe. Both Constantine and Helena are considered saints in both the Byzantine and Roman churches.

    CONSTANTINE THE GREAT (272-337):
    Religion and the State
    at the dawn of Europe




    'Visions of the Cross', by the School of Raphael, fresco, 1520-1524, Vatican Apostolic Palace. The central frame depicts Constantine before the Battle of Ponte Milvio )Milvian Bridge) and the cross he saw in the sky with the tag, 'In hoc signo vinces' - By this sign, you will conquer'.

    Vatican City, 17 April 2012 (VIS) - "Constantine the Great: The Roots of Europe" is the title of an international academic congress to be held in the Vatican from 18 to 21 April. The event was organised by the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences to mark the 1700th anniversary of the battle of Ponte Milvio and the conversion of the Emperor Constantine. [He would issue the Edict of Milan a few months later. 313 was truly an epochal year for Constantine and the immediate fate of Christianity in the early millennia.]

    The congress was presented this morning at a press conference held in the Holy See Press Office, by Fr. Bernard Ardura O. Praem., president of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences; Claire Sotinel, professor of Roman history at the University of Paris-Creteil and a member of the Ecole Francaise in Rome, and Giovanni Maria Vian, director of the "Osservatore Romano" newspaper.

    "The conference", Fr. Ardura explained, "is the outcome of effective academic cooperation with important cultural institutions such as the Vatican Secret Archives, the Vatican Apostolic Library, the Italian National Research Council, the Ambrosian Library and the Sacred Heart Catholic University in Milan".

    It is also taking place "with the cooperation and contribution of the European Union delegation to the Holy See, the Lazio Regional Council and the Pontifical Lateran University".

    This congress is the first of two, the second of which will be held in Milan in 2013 to mark the 1700th anniversary of the promulgation of the Edict of Milan, which established freedom of religion in the Roman empire and put an end to the persecution of certain religious groups, particularly Christians.

    While the 2013 congress will concern itself with what is known as the "Constantinian revolution", this year's event will focus on the environment in which Constantine lived and on relations between Christians and the Roman empire prior to the year 313.

    Participants will "examine the relationship between religion and the State, the idea of religious freedom in the empire, and religion from the point of view of the emperor and the senate", Fr. Ardura said.

    One key area will be the conversion and baptism of Constantine himself, and his attitude towards Christians following the battle of Ponte Milvio, which took place on 28 October 312 and led to the death of his rival Maxentius.

    Contemporary and later Christian historians, influenced by the narrative of Eusebius of Cesarea, saw Constantine's victory as the result of divine intervention.

    Fr. Ardura pointed out that "from a purely strategic-military viewpoint the battle was not very important, but it soon became the founding symbol of the new world which came into being when Constantine found Christianity. Indeed ... the era of imperial persecution against Christians was about to come to an end, giving way to the evangelisation of the entire empire and moulding the profile of western Europe and the Balkans; a Europe which gave rise to the values of human dignity, distinction and cooperation between religion and the State, and freedom of conscience, religion and worship."

    "Of course these things would need many centuries to come to maturity, but they all existed 'in nuce' (as a seed) in the 'Constantinian revolution' and therefore in the battle of the Milvian Bridge".

    For her part, Claire Sotinel explained that attentive and critical historical analysis "facilitates our understanding of what happened following the victory at the Milvian Bridge, helping us in the twenty-first century to reflect on important issues such as the interaction between religions and political power, the creation of religious pluralism, and the possibility of coexistence among different religions".


    Now, the Chief Rabbi of Rome
    claims that Constantine's conversion
    launched anti-Semitism in Europe

    by GIacomo Galeazzi
    Translated from


    Constantine the Great is raising a controversy in Rome, 1700 years since the Roman emperor converted to Christianity under the sign of the Cross.

    The Chief Rabbi of Rome, Riccardo Di Segni, claims that "Constantine's conversion changed everything, and had such an impact on history that it is closely linked to anti-Jewish persecution".

    But Vatican historians say otherwise. "There was not the least shade of anti-Semitism", saying that a black legend on Constantine continues to be fed today by those "who do not look kindly on the contributions of Christians to the public life".

    Di Segni, however, calls Constantine's conversion "an epochal watershed, which divided history into a before and after [NO! That distinction belongs only to the birth of Christ!] which led to a tragic upheaval that his successor, the Emperor Julian tried to set right, but for which Christians unfairly called him 'the Apostate'.

    He adds that to deny the role of Constantine in anti-Jewish persecution was "to go against every available historical evidence", not to mention the question of "his conversion was sincere, or simply a political move".

    Jewish persecutions started after the fourth century, said one of the historians participating in the Congress, who also blamed a popular book called Constantine's Sword, by James Carroll, for disseminating historically unfounded data about Constantine and his time.

    Giovanni Maria Vian, in his paper, cited a Marxist study by Italian historian Santo Mazzarino who called Constantine " the most revolutionary statesman that Europe had".

    Vian says, "Constantine has often been denounced for his autocracy but he was the most tenacious defender of religious freedom", a fallacy that, he says, Paul VI often deplored. Vian says that Constantine advocated "a healthy secularity which remains a model for relations between Italian society and the Church".


    Serbian Patriarch wants
    to meet Benedict XVI




    Photos taken at Patriarch Irinej's installation rites.

    BELGRADE, Jan. 27, 2010 (Translated from ANSA's Balkan service) - Irinej, the new Patriarch of the Serbian Orthodox Church, has reiterated his desire to meet Pope Benedict XVI, saying "the time has come for such a meeting" which could take place in Serbia.

    "In the past, a possible visit by the Bishop of Rome had been discussed, but our position at the time was that the time had not come and we should await the right occasion. Now, I think the time has come," the Patriarch was quoted in the Belgrade newspapers.

    "Perhaps it is time that we should tell each other directly what we have to say, and then we can both reflect. Divisions are never positive," he said. "And the division between the Eastern and Western Churches has lasted for centuries".

    Thus, he said, a meeting would be indispensable to start examining the outstanding issues. "It is not possible to get to know each other without meeting and talking to each other."

    In the days before his election earlier this week to replace Patriarch Pavle, who died last November at age 95, Irinej had said the Serbian Church would like to invite Benedict XVI to visit in 2013 on the 1700th anniversary of the Edict of Milan whereby Emperor Constantine officially recognized Christianity.



    Constantine the Great (272-337) was Roman Emperor from 306 to his death. Center photo, imperial coin from 313; right, head of the so-called Constantine Colossus, a 12-meter high statue of the emperor during his lifetime, now in Rome's Museo Capitolino.

    Serbia is celebrating this particularly in Nis, a city of south Serbia where Constantine was born to a Roman soldier and his wife. Irinej was Bishop of Nis until he was elected Patriarch.

    The twist to this story was that in May 2011, the aggresively proactive 'Foreign Minister' of the Moscow Patriarchate, Metropolitan Hilarion, did everything he could to stop the Serbian Patriarch from even thinking of inviting Benedict XVI to Serbia for the 2013 Jubilee.



    The city of NIS has a bilingual website on the Jubilee Year at
    edictofmilan2013.com/en/ from which I take the following overview:


    Considering the all-encompassing significance and the impact of the Edict of Milan on church, state and social life in Europe since the age of Constantine the Great until our time. and its everlasting value and permanent actuality, the Nis City has declared the Year of 2013 the Official Year of Edict of Milan Anniversary Celebration. Events dedicated to the jubilee celebration will last throughout the year of 2013.

    In Rome, the most powerful empire of the ancient world, almost three centuries after the birth of Jesus Christ, only 5% of the population was Christian. At that time Constantine was born in Nis. When his reign began, the Empire was pagan. He had visions and dreams in which the Monogram of Christ appeared followed by the words 'In hoc signo vinces" - By this sign, you will conquer - and he did go on to many military victories.

    In 313, Constantine and his co-emperor Licinius announced that it was proper that Christians and those who profess other religions should be free to practice the religion that appeared best to each one, thereby officially establishing religious freedom and tolerance throughout the Empire.

    The Edict of Milan did not make Christianity the state religion - it made the Roman Empire officially neutral with regard to religious worship, without making paganism, which was widespread, illegal.

    The religious freedom instituted for the first time anywhere by the Edict of Milan has particular resonance today when religious freedom is under widespread relentless assault, as never before in modern times, from the United States and Western Europe, to the countries of the false 'Arab spring', the Muslim countries of the Middle East, South Asia and Indonesia; and the Communist holdouts China, North Korea and Cuba..
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/01/2013 17:17]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.122
    Post: 8.614
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 17:47



    Friday, January 18,Firt Week in Ordinary Time

    Right photo: A biography of the saint; the title translates as 'Pierced by the Eucharist' referring to the stigma the saint received on his heart.
    ST. CARLO DA SEZZE (Charles of Sezze) (Italy, 1613-1670), Lay Franciscan, Mystic, Writer
    Born near Rome, the young Giancarlo dreamed of becoming a missionary to India, inspired by the mission of Fr. Junipero Serra in the Americas. but God had other plans for him and he ended up a lay Franciscan brother. A simple soul, he was assigned to various priories around Rome, serving as doorman, gardener, porter. Through it all, he served the sick and the needy by collecting alms and feeding them. His confessors urged him to write about his spiritual life, and though unlettered, he left many writings including his autobiography, The Grandeurs of the Mercies of God. It is said that at Mass one day, at the Elevation, a ray of light struck him in the chest and left a wound on the same spot where Christ had been pierced by a lance. After he died, the wound took on the shape of a cross, which was the basis for his beatification. In life, he was known for his spiritual counsel and for miracles of healing and multiplication of food. As he lay dying, Pope Clement IX is said to have called him to his side for counsel. He was canonized in 1959.
    [San Carlo da Sezze is just one of many Franciscan priests and lay brothers who lived sainted lives in menial jobs (doorman, gardener, alms-collector, etc) and were credited with performing miracles in their lifetime. Surely, there is much food for thought here.]
    Readings for today's Mass: www.usccb.org/bible/readings/011813.cfm



    AT THE VATICAN TODAY

    The Holy Father met with

    - Six bishops from the Basilicata region of Italy on ad limina visit.

    - Cardinal Manuel Monteiro de Castro, Major Penitentiary, and
    his regent, Mons. Krzysztof Józef Nykiel.




    The Holy Father has named a Coadjutor Archbishop for Cardinal Sean Brady, Archbishop of Armagh and Primate
    of all Ireland. As Coadjutor, Mons. Eamon Martin, who has been till now Apostolic Administrator of
    the Diocese of Kerry, will succeed Cardinal Brady when he retires.
    Brady had been under a lot of pressure from the media and interest groups to resign, since he disclosed three years ago that, as a young priest, then a high school teacher, at the behest of his bishop, he had interrogated a boy who accused a priest of sex abuse. The priest was Brendan Smythe who went on to be a serial abuser in his subsequent assignments, Following the practice in the 1970s, the boy was made to sign a confidentiality agreement, and neither his bishop nor Brady reported the accusation to the police, but the bishop reported Smythe's case to his Norbertine superiors and sent him away from the diocese and back to them. The Norbertines subsequently assigned Smythe to various posts where he was able to continue his crimes. The cardinal apologized for his part in that single incident, said he would let the Holy Father decide what was best for the diocese, requested him for a coadjutor in 2010, and said he would retire when he reaches 75 in August 2014.




    - Vatican Insider reports that the Holy Father has chosen Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, to preach the spiritual exercises for the Roman Curia this Lent. The weeklong retreat, attended by the Pope, begins on the first Sunday of Lent (March 1 this year).

    The report erroneously says Ravasi is the first current official of the Curia to preach the Lenten exercises. Cardinal Ratzinger was Prefect of the CDF when John Paul II asked him to conduct the retreat in 1983. But Ravasi is the first Curial member to be asked by Benedict XVI to lead the exercise in 8 years.



    The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity begins today, to end on January 25, Feast of the Conversion
    of St. Paul, when the Holy Father will preside at Vespers in the Basilica of San Paolo fuori le Mure.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 11:09]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.123
    Post: 8.615
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 18/01/2013 21:42

    Poster and title page of 30=page teaching supplement prepared by the Italian bishops and the rabbinical assembly of Italy.

    Sorry - I missed posting this yesterday because I thought today was the observance of the annual Day for Judaism dedicated by the Church in Italy every year (and other national Churches in Europe) to promoting dialog between Christians and Jews. But is is properly January 17, because it precedes the Week for Christian Unity which always begins on January 18...

    In considering the commandment
    of chastity and responsible love,
    this year's Jewish-Christian dialog
    focuses on the traditional family as
    the indispensable basis for society

    Translated from the Italian service of

    January 17, 2013

    The 24th annual day of dialog for Catholics and Jews was marked all over Italy yesterday. This year, the theme focused on the seventh commandment in the Jewish version of the Ten Commandments, "Thou shall not commit adultery" (sixth commandment in the Christian Decalogue). The cycle of reflections on the Ten Commandments began In previous years.

    In the teaching aid prepared for the observance this year, the Bishop of Pistoia, Mons. Mansueto Bianchi, who is also president of the Italian bishops' commission for ecumenism and inter-religious dialog, and Rabbi Elia Enreico Richetti, president of the Rabbinical Assembly of Italy, called on the faithful to reflect on the spousal relationship between man and woman, especially within the institution of the family, as an image of the covenant between God and man. Fabio Colagrande spoke with the bishop.

    MONS BIANCHI: In the tie that binds man and woman in marriage, we can recognize what we might call the natural structure of human relationship, but also the revelation of the face and the greatness of God to man in his covenant with God, which is realized in one form as the nuptial alliance of a man and a woman.

    I think that this effort to recognize and promote appreciation of the marriage link as a reflection of the greater relationship between God and his people, will be of help in our time. It will oblige us, in a way, to oppose the banalization or what we ma call the 'Whatever!' attitude that seems to be consolidating in our society regarding married love and the family - a debasement of values that is very evident in some strata of society today.

    Do you think that the family based on traditional marriage is in danger?
    I think it is threatened by the culture today because the family structure is being emptied of its specific contents and replaced by a range of other relationships and cohabitations that have nothing to do with God's design for the human family as we know from Biblical revelation.

    Let us recall that there is a document from the Pontifical Biblical Commission, signed by then Cardinal Ratzinger, when he was the head of it [ex-officio as CDF Prefect), that calls on Catholics for a constant commitment to 're-read' Judaism and its exegetical tradition. This seems to be something people forget...
    That is true, and yet, it is a valuable document because not only does it indicate stable points that we can rely on andbring to realization, but it also calls for a change in mental attitude that is so often subconscious in Christians, of thinking that Judaism is a thing of the past, whereas the document clearly shows how Scriptures, even during the time of the Old Covenant, are the roots of our common identity, and that we ourselves will not succeed in recognizing our Christian specificity, without the Old Testament that makes us brothers with the Jews.

    It also helps us understand that Judaism has a very rich history and is equally rich in spiritual tradition, in culture, in liturgical experience. In this sense, it certainly accompanies not just Italy and Europe, but all of mankind, in our common course through history.

    The reflection on the 'seventh commandment' that is the focus of this day of dialog also has to do with the sanctification of matrimonial life - kedusha in Hebrew. Colagrandi spoke to Rabbi Richetti about this:

    RABBI RICHETTI: The Jewish concept of kedusha has to do with bringing the natural events of daily life to a level of higher consciousness, namely, to realize that every thing is, in a certain sense, as God wills it.

    Sanctification of matrimonial life consists precisely in not living it as a purely physical and material experience, but as part of a far larger design which serves to maintain that which keeps the universe alive.

    We can also derive from this commandment an important teaching regarding the role of the family in society...
    Of course. Because in the Jewish tradition, the family is the first nucleus of society. Society is seen primarily as something that can promote and advance human existence, and is therefore based on the union of man and woman which alone can generate life.

    But from the viewpoint of dominant public opinion in today's culture, do you see the model of the family - based on marriage between a man and a woman - as endangered at this time?
    Let us say that there is a part of human society today that seems to forget that society is generated through the union of man and woman. I don't think there is a danger that natural procreation will cease. But I know that there are increasingly less marriages - though these too will never cease, thank God, because there will always be those who feel the cosmic necessity of basic truths.

    In the teaching aid for this Day of Dialog, you make a forceful statement, that one of the problems for Jewish-Christian dialog today is the awareness among Christians that Judaism is not gone at all or dying...
    Today we continue to have many indications that there are still many pockets of hatred, or opposition to Jewish ways. I think that only genuine knowledge and dialog will bring out the reality and contribute to put an end to hatred, which is the child of ignorance.

    What attitude would you say is most appropriate on this Day of Dialog?
    I would say that it should truly serve as a take-off point for reciprocal knowledge, to set good foundations for what we can both do for the common good. The Christian world will always find a total readiness for this on the part of the rabbis.

    I don't know whether, in the interests of promoting a basic awareness of Judaism among Catholics, anyone has ever prepared a primer that tells Catholics what are the main things we have in common with the Jews - belief in one God, descendance from Abraham, the Ten Commandments and the Old Testament, etc - which is quite a lot already. But also where we differ most, and perhaps this will be the more difficult to accept. The Jews think Jesus was just another good rabbi (I believe they endorse all his teachings about man's relationship to one another, but not what he says about himself), he certainly is not their awaited Messiah, much less the Son of God, nor God himself! And they dismiss the Christian idea of the Trinity. But these are the basic tenets that make us Christian.

    What we must not forget is that Jesus was a Jew - born a Jew, raised a Jew, died a Jew. Mary and Joseph were Jews, the apostles and early disciples were Jews - and that they all, starting with Jesus, lived their lives strictly according to Jewish religious instruction and law.

    The difference is that we believe Jesus is the awaited Savior anticipated in all of the Old Testament, while the Jews are still waiting for their Savior, despite all the consonances between the prophecies in the Old Testament and the life of Jesus. (Perhaps because Jews still believe that their Messiah will not just be a spiritual leader but a worldly leader as well, who will redeem and elevate the 'chosen people' and give them earthly power and status above all others So they will not accept either that Jesus extended the idea of 'chosen people' to everyone who accepts him as Savior.)

    I like to think of the Jews after Christ as somehow stuck in a time warp, and that therefore, they remain essentially as the Jews were in the lifetime of Christ. If the Jews are ignorant about Christ, then let that ignorance - there are two senses of 'ignorance' here: not knowing at all, or ignoring what one cannot believe - be their pretext for not accepting Jesus the way we Christians do. It need not be ill will, or even hatred - just a stubborn belief in the faith they were born into - for regardless of religion or lack of it, all men are brothers under God.

    So that's my personal attitude towards the Jews. Somehow I think there is a greater problem for them in that they would tend to ridicule the very idea of a man being God, or that there could be Three Persons in one God. But then, no other religion outside of Christianity believes in Christ's divinity, so the Jews are on equal footing with all the other non-Christian faiths there. (Having dabbled in some of the eastern religions, it always puzzled me that Buddhists and Hindus, for instance, could say "Even dust is divine" and invoke a myriad 'divinities' for every possible thing, and yet deny the divinity of a man who was also great and good and wise, not just some phantasmagoric representation of man's irrepressible need to imagine 'higher beings' that can help him make sense of life.)


    P.S. I came upon the PDF of the teaching aid issued for this year's Day of Judaism too late. In addition to a joint overview of the theme for this year's observance, it is a beautiful and most educational compilation of prayers and intercessions that can be said by borh Jewish and Christians, as well as pertinent Biblical citations. But it's all in Italian, of course, and I don't know how much and if I can translate what is most relevant....
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 01:40]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.124
    Post: 8.616
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 19/01/2013 05:05



    Living ecumenism will lead
    Christians to unity

    Translated from the Italian service of

    January 18, 2014

    The Italian report was translated from the original German in which the interview was conducted.

    Ecumenism practised in daily life will lead Christians towards eventual communion and visible unity, says Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, who spoke to Vatican Radio at the start of the annual Week of Prayer for Christian Unity which takes place January 18-25.

    This year's theme is: "What does God require of us?" taken from the Book of the prophet Micah.

    The cardinal spoke to Mario Galgano:

    CARDINAL KOCH: I believe that in the last fifty years, many things have happened. So many dialogs, so much rapprochement. I think especially of the great event that took place shortly before the end of the Second Vatican Council - when the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches both lifted their reciprocal excommunications [which happened during the Great Schism of 1054, when the Eastern Churches broke off from Rome] and consigned that to oblivion.

    I also think of the momentous 1999 Joint Declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity on the doctrine of justification, one of the main points that divided us during the Reformation...

    Alongside this, meanwhile, a worldwide network of ecumenical friendship has developed, which I think is even more important, because it won't be ecumenical 'documents' that will lead us to eventual unity, but communion in life.

    And yet, despite all that has been done, we must admit that the goal of ecumenism [i.e., the visible unity of all Christians] is far from achieved: We have not found unity, and there is much more work to be done to find it...

    About the dialog with the Orthodox Churches, one of the main difficulties appears to be the internal divisions among them...
    There already exists a joint theological commission in which the Catholic Church and all the Orthodox Churches except Bulgaria are represented. [Actually, this joint commission has reached the most advanced stage of any ecumenical effort so far, because they have arrived at starting to discuss how to deal with the primacy of the Pope in Rome in a unified Church. That's not to say it will be easy sailing from here on! A millennium of separation from Rome has only entrenched the Orthodox Churches in their autonomy of each other, and they may not take kindly to being 'under Rome' in any way, even if Rome has a record in modern times of being very solicitous that the Eastern Churches loyal to the Pope retain their local autonomies.]

    In fact, there are some tensions among some of the Orthodox Churches. That is why I think that an eventual pan-Orthodox Synod is most important. I have been following this development with great sympathy because I am convinced that if they hold such a pan-Orthodox Synod, it will be pf great help to the ecumenical dialog.

    [But will the Patriarchate of Moscow agree to take part in such a Synod, if it cannot get the majority of the autonomous Churches to support it in its open rivalry with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople? Moscow has the great advantage of numbers (the 110 million Russian Orthodox faithful make up almost 40% of the total Orthodox population, vs the measly 73,000 faithful in Patriarch Bartholomew's native Turkey), substantial state support (in Turkey, the Orthodox Church is still fighting to be recognized as a legal entity), and great material resources and organizatipn. And yet the Ecumenical Patriarchate is primus inter pares in the Orthodox world by history. From all indications, Moscow is determined to establish its undisputed hegemony over Orthodox Christianity in its desire to assert itself as a counterweight to Rome. IMHO, I see this naked geopolitical ambition as the greatest obstacle to any further rapprochement between Orthodox Christianity and Rome.]

    What is the role of the Year of Faith in this Week of Prayer for christian Unity?
    I think it has a central role during the whole year, because the foundational element of ecumenism is the faith. Ecumenism is not just diplomatic and political - it is about faith. What unites all Christians at present is Baptism, which is validly recognized by all the churches, and the Apostles Creed. In this sense, the Year of Faith is a great challenge for all Christians to find the roots of ecumenism in the Christian faith we all share.


  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.125
    Post: 8.617
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 19/01/2013 12:50


    Beauty: A necessity, not a luxury
    By Fr. Charles Klamut

    January 15, 2013

    Fr. Klamut was prdained in 1999 in the diocese of Peoria, Illinois, He is currently working in campus ministry at St John's Catholic Newman Center at the University of Illinois.

    I recently visited the Botanical Garden in St Louis. Amid the sights and smells, the colors and creatures, the sun, the architecture, and the sheer gratuity of so much botanical diversity, I felt happy to be alive. Drinking it in, I turned to a friend and said, “How could we live without this?” He replied, “We couldn’t.”

    I’ve been thinking about this little exchange. Upon reflection, I am becoming certain that they are not just sentimental words, but the truth. And with this conviction, I’m not alone.

    Luigi Giussani, the great 20th century priest, educator, and writer (and whose cause for canonization has just begun), insisted throughout his great life on our need for beauty; for beautiful, real things which have the power to awaken our hearts.

    During Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s homily for Fr Giussani’s funeral in 2005, two months shy of his unexpected elevation to the papacy, he said that Fr Giussani was “wounded by the desire for beauty.” He noted how much Fr Giussani loved music, and said that, in looking for Beauty. he was looking for Christ.

    In Giussani, we have an author whose books overflow with quotations from poets, novelists and philosophers; a priest whose ministry to students often took place on hikes through the Alps; a teacher who raised the eyebrows of colleagues by walking into the classroom at Berchet High School, back in his early days of teaching, carrying a phonograph with records of Chopin and Beethoven, in order to provoke his students with the wound of beauty.

    Jesus said: “You will know them by their fruits.” By sharing his own wound of beauty with his students, the fruit of Giussani has become a movement in the church called Communion and Liberation, which has moved the hearts of its members in almost 100 countries now.

    Giussani is not the only modern day Catholic luminary to champion the cause of beauty. On Easter Sunday, 1999, Pope John Paul II issued his “Letter to Artists.” This profound document is not just for artists, but for everyone, offering a deep reflection on the mystery of the human person and the innate human need for beauty.

    According to Blessed John Paul II, beauty offers “a momentary glimpse of the vastness of light that has its original wellspring in God” (#7). The Pope says that “every genuine art form, in its own way, is a path to the inmost reality of the human being and the world. It is, therefore, a wholly valid approach to the realm of faith, which gives human experience its ultimate meaning” (#7).

    The Pope goes through a brief historical sketch of the many ways the Gospel has inspired “epiphanies” of beauty which artists have shared with the Church and the world. He speaks favorably of the enormously fruitful alliance between faith and art, and between the Church and artists, and has sections entitled, “The Church Needs Art” and “Does Art Need the Church?”(to which he answers a resounding “yes!”).

    He links true art with authentic Christian humanism, saying: “Even beyond its typically religious expressions, true art has a close affinity with the world of faith, so that, even in situations where culture and the Church are far apart, art remains a kind of bridge to religious experience. Insofar as it seeks the beautiful, as the fruit of an imagination which rises above the everyday, art is by its nature a kind of appeal to the Mystery” (#10).

    The Pope also said that, in light of Vatican II, we need to build on the foundation laid there for “a renewed relationship between the Church and culture.” Art is a privileged way of doing this.

    Quoting Vatican II, he said, “This world needs beauty in order not to sink into despair. Beauty, like truth, brings joy to the human heart, and is that precious fruit which resists the erosion of time, which unites generations and enables them to be one in admiration” (# 11, quoting from a talk given by Council Fathers at the end of Vatican II).

    Pope Benedict XVI shares his predecessor’s views on the importance of art and beauty in the life of faith. As Cardinal Ratzinger, he made some comments along these lines which are very inspiring. In a message to members of Communion and Liberation in 2002, he said “Christian art today… must oppose the cult of the ugly.”

    He spoke of the “wound” of beauty which inspires and provokes man with nostalgia for his transcendent destiny. He quotes Plato’s Phaedrus, reflecting as follows:

    Plato contemplates the encounter with beauty as the salutary emotional shock that makes man leave his shell and sparks his “enthusiasm” by attracting him to what is other than himself.

    Man, says Plato, has lost the original perfection that was conceived for him. He is now perennially searching for the healing primitive form. Nostalgia and longing impel him to pursue the quest; beauty prevents him from being content with just daily life. It causes him to suffer.

    In the Platonic sense, we could say that the arrow of nostalgia pierces man, wounds him and, in this way, gives him wings, lifts him upwards toward the transcendent … The beautiful wounds, but this is exactly how it summons man to his final destiny.

    He describes an experience he had at a Bach concert he attended with his friend, Lutheran Bishop Hanselmann:

    When the last note triumphantly faded away, we looked at each other spontaneously, and right then we said: ‘Anyone who has heard this, knows that the faith is true.’ The music had such an extraordinary force of reality that we realized, no longer by deduction, but by the impact with our hearts, that it could not have originated from nothingness, but could only have come to be through the power of the Truth that became real in the composer’s inspiration.

    He is describing the way that beauty conquers nihilism, and affirms reality, being, and truth.

    Ratzinger is not content to dwell just on artistic beauty. He goes on to speak of the beauty of holiness, and its power to convince a skeptical world weary of words.

    “I have often affirmed my conviction that the true apology of Christian faith, the most convincing demonstration of its truth against every denial, are the saints, and the beauty that the faith has generated. Today, for faith to grow, we must lead ourselves, and the persons we meet, to encounter the saints, and to enter into contact with the Beautiful.”

    In his talk, Ratzinger also favorably quotes the great Swiss priest-theologian, Hans Urs von Balthasar, whose life work was largely to do with theology under the auspices of the “third transcendental,” namely Beauty. Balthasar believed that beauty makes truth credible; that something true and good will also, somehow, be beautiful.

    He believed that, amid the damage done to the credibility of truth and goodness in recent history, beauty remains as perhaps the most hopeful path toward re-awakening us to the glory of God, and his divine revelation.

    Balthasar was a man of immense learning and culture, a lover of literature, art, music, as well as theology. He incorporated all these elements into his writings, especially his “Theological Aesthetics” part of his major work, “The Glory of the Lord.”

    Ratzinger notes, with some apparent regret, that while details from
    Balthasar’s work have passed into theological work, his “fundamental approach”—in truth, the essential element of the whole work—has not been so readily accepted.

    Balthasar used, as one of his interpretive theological keys, the biblical concept of “glory,” seen as the radiant, inherent beauty and love of God, manifested gratuitously to man in Christ.

    Both Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II quote the famous line from Dostoevsky’s The Idiot, which says, “Beauty will save the world.” With Dostoevsky, they mean not some shallow aestheticism, but rather a beauty which is capable of truly “wounding” exhausted hearts by breaking through the thick clouds which darken so much of contemporary society, awakening (or re-awakening) us to our original, infinite, transcendent dignity and destiny.

    The 20th century German Catholic philosopher, Josef Pieper, spoke of this phenomenon in the realm of philosophy but in a way easily transferable to that of art, calling it: “piercing the dome of the work-a-day world.”

    My experience of forty years of life has been a convincing verification of all these things. I’ve seen it over and over. Just when I am about to succumb to the sadness and living death of nihilism, some piercing ray of beauty breaks open my heart, and the breath of possibility returns. A personal existential certainty confirms for me that the proposals of these giants of faith and humanity are true:

    - The “wounding” desire for beauty;
    - The experience with works of art as a path to the inmost realities of the human and of faith;
    - The experience of art as a bridge to religious faith;
    - Art as a privileged way towards a renewed relationship between faith and culture;
    - Beauty as an antidote to despair and the “cult of the ugly”;
    - The “arrow of nostalgia” that piercingly summons to a transcendent destiny; and
    - The demonstration of faith’s truth through convincing artistic works.

    “Beauty will save the world.” That remains to be seen. But beauty has saved me, and continues to do so. My experience is that I need saving; it is not a luxury. Beauty saves. Or, to put it more precisely, beauty points me to the One who saves, who is Beauty itself.

    Beauty is a necessity, not a luxury. Beauty moves us, awakens us, provokes us, bringing freshness and newness to hearts that have too easily grown old and stale.

    A luxury is something extra, added on after duties are complete. But beauty is not something extra, it is what comes first. Because without beauty, the duties prove too hard and, eventually, seem pointless. An old, tired soul cannot move itself, cannot sustain itself. It ultimately fails in its tasks.

    Beauty renews the soul, pointing us ever back to our origins and our destiny, making life begin again.

    May God never leave us bereft of anointed artists, prophets, and poets of the transcendent, who will keep wounding our hearts with nostalgia for the infinite destiny which alone matches the aspirations of our hearts.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 13:13]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.126
    Post: 8.618
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 19/01/2013 15:46


    I started this exercise idly by wondering - in view of the momentary media preoccupation with 'Gorgeous Georg'e - whether, other than we Benaddicts, the general media had ever written about Joseph Ratzinger's good looks, but I can't Google anything of the sort. I think perhaps, the fact that he came to wider media attention when he was already a cardinal and called to Rome by John Paul II (he was only 55 then, one year younger than GG is now) precluded anyone from commenting on his looks, this aspect being irrelevant for prelates. (Also, he's not six feet tall. Indeed, if it comes to good looks, it would seem no one ever pointed that out either about the imposingly handsome Cardinal Martini.)... From the montage above that I put together hastily years ago, one wonders why no one thought to call the cardinal 'Gorgeous Joseph' then. Did the Italian media coin the term 'il bel Bavarese' )the beautiful Bavarian) or was that an Italian Benaddict tag?... Well, in the process of Googling, I came upon BBC News's recently updated 'profile' of Benedict XVI, which I am posting here, warts and all...

    Profile:
    Pope Benedict XVI


    Updated January 3, 2013

    At 78, Benedict XVI was one of the oldest new Popes in history when he was elected in 2005.

    Previously known as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the piano-playing professor was looking forward to retirement when Pope John Paul II died in 2005. He has said he never wanted to be Pope.

    If he or any of the cardinals who elected him imagined a brief, uneventful reign, paving a transition to a new era, they were to be disappointed.

    Benedict took the helm as one of the fiercest storms the Catholic Church has faced in decades - the scandal of child sex abuse by priests - was breaking.

    Other gaffes, mishaps and scandals have provided plenty of ammunition to critics both inside and outside the Church.

    In fact, he has taken charge during a particularly difficult period, when a rapidly changing world has provided continuous challenges to an institution whose traditions go back 2,000 years.

    The flood of allegations, lawsuits and official reports into clerical abuse, which reached a peak in 2009 and 2010, may be the defining episode of his pontificate. [Why not the positive side of it - which is all that he has done to redress previous inattention to the problem and to make sure that it does not recur except as inevitable truly isolated cases?]

    The most damaging claims for the Church have been that local dioceses - or even the Vatican itself - were complicit in the cover-up of many of the cases, prevaricating over the punishment of paedophile priests and sometimes moving them to new postings where they continued to abuse. [Yes, but there should be a simple statement to say that this phenomenon is not limited to Catholic priests but takes place just as much among ministers of other faiths and even more so among laymen in jobs that involve constant contact with young people.]

    While some senior Vatican figures initially lashed out at the media or alleged an anti-Catholic conspiracy, the Pope has insisted that the Church accept its own responsibility, pointing directly to "sin within the Church".

    He has met and issued an unprecedented apology to victims, made clear that bishops must report abuse, and introduced fast-track rules for defrocking abusive priests.

    Before his election as Pope, Cardinal Ratzinger spent 24 years as one of the senior figures in the Vatican, heading the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith - once known as the Holy Office of the Inquisition.

    It earned him the nickname "God's rottweiler" [from the British press which popularized the epithet by using it in headliens when he was elected Pope],and played to his passion for Catholic doctrine.

    His high office gave him ultimate oversight of a number of clerical abuse cases.

    Critics say he did not grasp the gravity of the crimes involved, allowing them to languish for years without proper attention - or even that he deliberately subordinated the victims' welfare to that of the Church itself. He has never publicly given his own version of events. [What version does he need to give? He had nothing to do at all with the sex abuse cases until John Paul II gave the responsibility to the CDF in 2001, since when much of what the CDF has done has been public knowledge!]

    His backers, however, say he has done more than any other Pope to confront abuse. [That is plain dishonest and weaselly of the BBC, simply to ascribe the statement to 'his backers'! If they wanted to, the facts are easy enough to assemble of everything he has done as CDP Prefect and as Pope to extirpate this cancer from the Church. Besides, it's not just that "he has done more than any other Pope" to control abuse - he's really the only one who has done so. Even if the problem had never really surfaced significantly until 2001, and so, earlier Popes did not have to deal with it. Also, his predecessor Pope did recognize the magnitude of the problem enough in his final years to put him in charge of it.]

    Shortly before his election in 2005, he lamented: "How much filth there is in the Church, and even among those... in the priesthood."

    And one of his first acts as Pope was to banish a former Vatican favourite, Father Marcial Maciel, whose sexual and criminal exploits were starting to come to light.

    Joseph Ratzinger was born into a traditional Bavarian farming ['rural' is probably the more correct adjective] family in 1927, although his father was a policeman.

    The eighth German to become Pope, he speaks many languages and has a fondness for Mozart and Beethoven.

    He was said to have admired the red robes of the visiting archbishop of Munich when he was just five and carried his love of finery to the Vatican, where he has re-introduced papal hats not seen in decades. [Hats are now considered finery? Both the camauro and the saturno serve practical purposes = one against the cold, the other against the sun!]

    At the age of 14, he joined the Hitler Youth, as was required of young Germans of the time.

    World War II saw his studies at Traunstein seminary interrupted when he was drafted into an anti-aircraft unit in Munich.

    He deserted the German army towards the end of the war and was briefly held as a prisoner-of-war by the Allies in 1945.

    The Pope's conservative, traditionalist views were intensified by his experiences during the liberal 1960s.

    He taught at the University of Bonn from 1959 and in 1966 took a chair in dogmatic theology at the University of Tuebingen. [Between which there was Muenster. But the major oversight here - no mention at all of his work in Vatican II![

    However, he was appalled at the prevalence of Marxism among his students.

    In his view, religion was being subordinated to a political ideology that he considered "tyrannical, brutal and cruel".

    He would later be a leading campaigner against liberation theology, the movement to involve the Church in social activism, which for him was too close to Marxism. [And totally and wrongly subordinated the spiritual mission of the Church to political action!]

    In 1969 he moved to Regensburg University in his native Bavaria and rose to become its dean of theology and vice-president.

    He was named Cardinal of Munich by Pope Paul VI in 1977. [No, unpardonably imprecise of BBC News! First he was named Archbishop of Munich-Freising, then a month after his episcopal ordination, he was made a Cardinal. I have not checked, but I believe that swift rise is a record unmatched in modern times.]

    At the age of 78, Joseph Ratzinger was the oldest cardinal to become Pope since Clement XII was elected in 1730.

    It was always going to be difficult living up to his charismatic predecessor. [What? Nothing follows??? What about the fact that he has attracted more people to his liturgies and audiences, or that the reception for him abroad has certainly not been less than that for John Paul II, as the BBC itself could well attest from the Sept. 2010 state visit to the UK?]

    "If John Paul II had not been Pope, he would have been a movie star; if Benedict had not been Pope, he would have been a university professor," wrote US Vatican expert John L Allen. [How stupid is that statement! He was a university professor for 25 years.]

    He has a reputation as a theological conservative, taking uncompromising positions on homosexuality, women priests and contraception.

    He espouses Christian compassion - speaking out for human rights, protection of the environment and the fight against poverty and injustice.

    A central theme of his papacy has been his defence of fundamental Christian values in the face of what he sees as moral decline across much of Europe.

    He has confounded those who expected him to appoint hardline traditionalists to key posts.

    But the conclave of cardinals, which will elect his successor, is now dominated by Benedict's appointees, and has a bias towards European, and particularly Italian, clerics. [Not so! That facile and superficial impression is belied by the actual numbers.]

    Benedict is described by those who know him as laidback, with a mild and humble manner, but with a strong moral core.

    One cardinal put it another way, calling him "timid but stubborn".

    Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor, the former head of the Church in England and Wales, says he is "unfailingly courteous" and has many talents, but administration is not one of them. [As Joseph Ratzinger himself has decried about himself! But the Pope is not supposed to administer as if he were a CEO - for that, he has his Secretary of State and the Curia, Too bad Cardinal Bertone has failed to provide Benedict XVI with the effective administration he needs.]

    An embarrassing leak of documents from the Pope's desk revealing corruption and mismanagement inside the Vatican [and that's how historians will describe Vatileaks if they depended only on media reports and commentary, as most will] led to the conviction of his butler [VALET!]. The affair gave a damaging impression of a power struggle at the Holy See. [Another facile and fallacious statement. It wasn't as if there was any titanic struggle between equals - just petty power struggles of permanent bureaucrats wanting to preserve their fiefdoms and trying to unseat the Secretary of State, thlough not one of them has the stature to challenge him!]

    The Pope's handling of the child abuse scandals also attracted stinging criticism from the secular press. [Mis-statement! The sting was not in criticism of his handling - what could they criticize about it, after all, when he was always ahead of their curve? - but the sting (more like repeated homicidal stiletto stabs, really) was in the crusade of leading media like the AP. the New Yotk Times, and years before them, the BBC, to link him directly, even if in a patently false way, to covering up sex abuse by priests when he was Archbishop of Munich and as CDF Prefect.]

    And he has managed to offend Muslims, Jews, and Protestants with his actions and speeches. [No responsible journalist throws out a line like that without citing at least one example of each, because otherwise, the intended impression is that offending others is habitual with him!]

    Supporters argue such incidents misrepresent the Pope's avowed intention of improving inter-faith relations.

    He has reached out, visiting the Blue Mosque in Istanbul, and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, and praying for peace at the Western Wall.

    Even so, questions were raised about those who advised the Pope, and their attention to public relations - leading, eventually, to the appointment of a former Fox News correspondent, Greg Burke, to head the Vatican's communications strategy.

    For Benedict, public relations gaffes may only be fleeting concerns compared with the serious long-term challenges for the Church - the falling away from the Church of millions of Catholics [??? Oh, OK, if the BBC is referring to all the millions of secularized Europeans], and the decline in numbers of priests being recruited in the West.

    [The second big oversight in this profile: Not a word about his writings and books! You;d think JESUS OF NAZARETH at least deserved a mention.]

    Benedict seems unlikely to meet any of these crises by compromising with the liberal modern world.

    He has always believed that the strength of the Church comes from an absolute truth that does not bend with the winds.

    That approach disappoints those who feel the Church needs to modernise and despair of his intransigence on priestly celibacy or condoms.
    [It has noting to do with intransigence, as if these were purely personal decisions at his discretion. It is his duty as Pope to preserve the continuing Tradition and Magisterium of the Church.]

    But for his supporters, it is exactly why he is the man to lead the Church through such challenging times.

    [Except for using the word 'intransigence', the anonymous profiler appoars to have regained his good sense with those last sentences!]


    And here are two pictures I serendipitously came across during the above exercise:


    The commemorative card for the 25h anniversary of his priesthood I had seen before because it was posted in the PICTURES thread of the Papa Ratznger Forum by Maklara back when, but really, I had forgotten all about it (or I would have resurrected it when the brothers Ratzinger celebrated their Diamond Jubilee as priests in 2011); while the stamp from Romania is a complete surprise. The caption says it was issued in 2005 - I've checked back - it's a companion stamp to one they issued about him when he became Pope...

    Translation of the words on the Silver Jubilee commemorative card:

    By the grace of God
    25 years a priest of Jesus Christ
    JOSEPH RATZINGER
    Professor of Theology

    1951 June 29 1976

    "We are God's co-workers;
    You are God's field, God's building".
    (1Cor 3,9)

    The upper bottom line identifies "Christ, from a deesis, Greek, 17th century. private collection" which must be the front piece of the card. The lower line is justinformation about the printer.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 20/01/2013 00:56]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.127
    Post: 8.619
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 19/01/2013 18:53




    Saturday, January 19, First Week in Ordinary Time

    ST. FABIAN (d. 250), POPE AND MARTYR
    Fabian was a Roman layman who came into the city from his farm one day in 236, as clergy and people were preparing
    to elect a new Pope. Eusebius, historian of the early Church, says a dove flew in and settled on the head of Fabian.
    This sign united the votes of clergy and laity and he was chosen unanimously. He led the Church for 14 years and was
    one of the first martyrs killed during the persecution of Decius in 250 AD. He is credited with having Christianized
    Gaul (now France), sending out seven trusted bishops to do this. St. Cyprian wrote That Fabian was an 'incomparable'
    man whose glory in death matched the holiness and purity of his life. He was buried in the catacombs of St. Callistus;
    his gravestone, broken into four by time, bears the Greek words, “Fabian, bishop, martyr.”
    Readings for today's Mass: www.usccb.org/bible/readings/011913.cfm



    AT THE VATICAN TODAY

    The Holy Father met with

    - Cardinal Marc Ouellet, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops (weekly meeting)

    - Participants in the Plenary Assembly of the Pontifical Council Cor Unum. Address in Italian.






    SEVEN YEARS, NINE MONTHS AND COUNTING...

    AD MULTOS ANNOS, SANCTE PATER!





    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/01/2013 18:53]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 26.128
    Post: 8.620
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 19/01/2013 19:34


    Our Lady of Egypt is the patron saint of the Coptic Catholic cathedral in Nasr City, Cairo.

    Pope formally welcomes
    election of the new Patriarch
    of the Catholic Copts

    Translated from

    January 19, 2013

    The Holy Father yesterday conferred ecclesiastical communion requested from him, under Canon 6, Section 2, of the Code of Canon Law for the Oriental Churches, by His Beatitude Ibrahim Isaac Sidrak, who was canonically elected Patriarch of Alexandria of the Copts on January 15, by the Synod of that Patriarchal Church, after the resignation of His Beatitude Cardinal Antonios Naguib, 77, for health reasons.

    Below is the text of the letter sent by the Holy Father to the new Patriarch (original in French):




    TO HIS BEATITUDE
    IBRAHIM ISAAC SIDRAK
    Patriarch of Alexandria of the Copts

    The election of Your Beatitude to the Patriarchal See of Alexandria of the Copts is an important event for the entire Church, and I have received your request for ecclesiastical communion with joy, giving thanks to God Almighty.

    I extend to you my warmest congratulations, with my fervent prayer to Christ that he may accompany you in the accomplishment of this new responsibility.

    With all my heart, I welcome your request for ecclesiastical communion which I grant to you according to the practice of the Catholic Church.

    I am sure, Beatitude, that with the strength of Christ, conqueror of evil and death through his Resurrection, and with the help of the fathers in your Patriarchal Synod, in communion with the Episcopal College, you will have the fervor to lead the Coptic Church, as she goes to encounter her Spouse, our Savior, illuminated by the preaching of the evangelist St. Mark and accompanied by his procession of saints led by St. Anthony Abbot.

    May the Lord assist you in your ministry as Father and Head ('Pater et Caput') in proclaiming the Word of God, so that it may be lived and celebrated piously according to the ancient spiritual and liturgical traditions of the Coptic Church.

    May all your faithful find comfort in the paternal solicitude of their new Patriarch.

    I extend to you, Beatitude, my most fraternal greetings, as well as to your venerated predecessor, His Beatitude Cardinal Antonios Naguib, and to the members of the Synod, with the Apostolic Blessing which I gladly extend to the bishops, priests religious and lay faithful of the entire Patriarchal Church.


    From the Vatican
    January 18, 2013





    The Vatican likewise released the text of the letter of Patriarch Sidrak to the Pope:



    Your Holiness,

    The Synod of Bishops of the Coptic Catholic Church, meeting on January 12-16, 2013, at the Casa Comboni in the Convent of the Missionary Sisters and Pious Mothers of Nigrizia, in Mogattam, have elected me, unworthy as I am, to succeed His Beatitude Cardinal Antonios Naguib, who has been for all our Church a true 'Pater et Caput' and an example of paternal care, charity and sacrifice throughout his ministry.

    Through this letter, I implore Your Holiness to grant 'ecclesiastical communion' that will allow me to be faithful to our Lord in doing all I can to serve best the flock that has been entrusted to me, while expressing my fidelity, veneration and obedience to the Supreme Pastor of the Church, Successor of Peter, and our most beloved Pope.

    Imploring also your Apostolic Blessing and asking a prayer for the coming Synod and the immediate future which is decisive for the life of our Church, we assure you of our full fidelity to Holy Mother Church and our devotion to your beloved Person.

    To Your Holiness, most devoted in Christ,

    Ibrahim Isaac Sidrak
    Patriarch of Alexandria of the Coptic Catholicsi



    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 20/01/2013 00:58]
  • 371
    Passa alla versione desktop