Benedetto XVI Forum Luogo d'incontro di tutti quelli che amano il Santo Padre.

BENEDICT XVI: NEWS, PAPAL TEXTS, PHOTOS AND COMMENTARY

  • Messaggi
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.175
    Post: 7.675
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 03/07/2012 18:54






    See preceding page for earlier entries today, 7/3/12.



    Tuesday, July 3, 13th Week in Ordinary Time

    Paintings on the left: St. Thomas by El Greco; and 'Doubting Thomas' by Caravaggio. Sculpture of Jesus and Thomas, by Andrea del Verrocchio. Prayer card, second from right, depicts St. Thomas receiving Our Lady's sash, according to an ancient legend.
    ST. THOMAS (b Judea, d India), Apostle and Martyr
    Benedict XVI dedicated his catechesis on 9/27/06 to this apostle
    www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060927...
    He points out that he was always mentioned in the four apostles' lists compiled in the Gospels as well as in Acts. More importantly, he said or occasioned sayings by Jesus which are among the best known from the Bible. Shortly before the Passion, when Jesus said he was going to Bethany near Jerusalem to see Lazarus who had died, Thomas told his fellow Apostles, "Let us go so we may die with him" - the essence, says the Pope, of discipleship. At the Last Supper, he tells Jesus, "We do not know where you are going - how can we know the way?" And Jesus answers, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life". Eight days after Easter, at the famous scene where he touches the wounds of Jesus, he exclaims "My Lord and My God!" - as Benedict XVI calls it, 'the most splendid profession of faith in the New Testament'. And Jesus tells Thomas and all of us, "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe". When the Apostles dispersed to spread the Gospel after Pentecost, Thomas travelled the farthest, first evangelizing in Syria and Persia, and then in western and southern India, where he was stoned and stabbed to death by Brahmins near Madras. Indian Catholics cherish a legend that since Thomas was not present at Mary's death, he had a vision of her Assumption during which she tossed her sash to him.
    Readings for today's Mass:
    www.usccb.org/bible/readings/070312.cfm



    AT THE VATICAN TODAY

    The Holy Father leaves this afternoon for Castel Gandolfo, where he will spend the summer and will not
    be returning to the Vatican till the end of September.

    The Vatican has released the Pope's official program for his apostolic visit to Lebanon on Sept. 14-16.


    Apparently, Photobucket is undergoing routine maintenance so images are not currently available...
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 03/07/2012 18:56]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.176
    Post: 7.676
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 03/07/2012 22:53


    The Vatican has released the official program for the Pope's Apostolic Visit to Lebanon in September.


    APOSTOLIC TRIP OF BENEDICT XVI

    TO LEBANON, September 14-16, 2012


    Signing and Publication of the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation
    on the October 2010 Special Assembly of the Bishops' Synod on the Middle East



    P R O G R A M

    Friday, Sept. 14

    ROME

    09.30 Departure from Ciampino Airport, Rome, for Beirut.

    BEIRUT

    13.45 Arrival in Beirut

    WELCOME CEREMONY
    Rafiq Hariri International Airport
    - Address by the Holy Father

    The Holy Father will stay at the Apostolic Nunciature in Harissa.

    HARISSA

    18.00 Visit to the Basilica of St. Paul
    SIGNING OF THE POST-SYNODAL APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION
    - Address by the Holy Father

    Saturday, Sept. 15

    HARISSA

    08.00 Private Mass

    BAABDA

    10.00 COURTESY VISITS WITH LEBANESE LEADERS
    Presidential Palace at Baabda
    Separate private meetings with the President of the Republic,
    the President of Parliament, and
    the President of the Council of Ministers

    10.50 MEETING WITH THE LEADERS OF THE MUSLIM RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES
    Hall of the Ambassadors, Presidential Palace

    11.15 MEETING WITH LEADERS OF GOVERNMENT AND LEBANESE INSTITUTIONS,
    THE DIPLOMATIC CORPS, RELIGIOUS LEADERS, AND
    REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE WORLD OF CULTURE
    May 25 Commemorative Hall, Presidential Palace
    - Address by the Holy Father.

    BZOMMAR

    13.30 Lunch with the Patriarchs and Bishops of Lebanon,
    Members of the Special Council for the Middle East
    of the Bishops'Synod, and the papal delegation
    Refectory of the Catholic Armenian Patriarchate

    BKERKE

    18.00 MEETING WITH YOUNG PEOPLE
    Piazza facing the Maronite Patriarchate
    - Address by the Holy Father

    Sunday, Sept. 16

    BEIRUT

    10.00 HOLY MASS
    and Handover of the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation
    Beirut city center waterfront
    - Homily by the Holy Father
    - ANGELUS prayers
    - Remarks by the Holy Father.

    HARISSA

    13.20 Lunch with the papal delegation
    Apostolic Nunciature

    16.50 Farewell from the Nunciature

    CHARFET

    17.15 ECUMENICAL ENCOUNTER
    Salon d'Honneur, Syro-Catholic Patriarchate

    BEIRUT

    18.30 DEPARTURE CEREMONY
    Rafiq Hariri International Airport
    - Address by the Holy Father

    19.00 Departure for Rome

    ROME

    21.40 Arrival at Ciampino Airport

    NB: Beirut is one hour ahead of Rome.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 03/07/2012 23:09]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.179
    Post: 7.679
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 03/07/2012 23:53


    Pope Benedict begins
    annual summer 'holiday'

    Adapted from

    July 3, 2012

    Pope Benedict XVI left the Vatican this afternoon for the cooler climate of the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo, south of Rome.

    As of today, he is officially ‘on holiday’ in the Alban Hills, where he will spend a rest period for the month of July without any public audiences or official private audiences. He will, however, continue to lead the midday Angelus on Sundays/

    But the Holy Father's July schedule also has a few events including a concert and visits to two of the towns around Lake Albano collectively known as the Castelli Romani.

    On Monday, July 9, he will visit the ancient town of Nemi perched above a lake of the same name, which is home to the Divine Word Missionaries’ (SVD) International Ad Gentes Centre.

    This visit with the SVD, who are concluding their annual General Chapter, is almost a sentimental visit for Benedict XVI. In 1964 the Nemi centre was the venue for the deliberations of the editorial committee which prepared the draft of Vatican II’s decree Ad Gentes on the missionary activity of the Church.

    The committee, formed by four bishops and then SVD superior general Fr. Johannes Schütte, was assisted by five periti (expert consultants), one of them, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger.

    The first concert this summer in honor of the Pope will take place at the inner courtyard of the Apostolic Palace on Wednesday, July 11, when once again, he will listen to the symphonic music of Beethoven under the baton of Argentine-born Israeli conductor Daniel Barenboim. He who conducted the Ninth Symphony at La Scala last June 1 when the Pope was there for the VII World Meeting of Families. They will perform Beethoven's Fifth and Sixth Symphonies.

    The orchestra, based in Seville, Spain, was founded in 1999 by Barenboin and the late Palestinian-American scholar Edward Said to promote understanding between Israelis and Palestinians.

    Then, on Sunday, July 15, the Pope will make a pastoral visit to the nearby diocese of Frascati, where he will celebrate Mass in St. Peter’s Cathedral.

    My addendum:

    The General Audiences will resume in August, a month that will feature the Pope's Assumption Mass at the parish church of San Tomasso da Villanova in Castel Gandolfo, and in its final days, the annual seminar-reunion of the Ratzinger Schuelerkreis.

    In mid-September, the Pope will fly to Lebanon for a three-day apostolic visit, the second and last of his two foreign trips this year.

    He returns to the Vatican in October for a busy month that will see the canonization of new saints and the proclamation of two new Doctors of the Church (Hildegarde von Bingen and Juan de Avila) - the first in his Pontificate; the General Assembly of the Bishops' Synod to discuss the New Evangelization (Oct 7-28), and the start of the Year of Faith on Oct. 11, 50th anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 03/07/2012 23:54]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.180
    Post: 7.679
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 01:01


    I'm tempted to simply reduce the following to a series of brief bullet points since much of it is 'no news', but I'll translate in full because I sympathize with poor Fr. Lombardi who has to give these daily briefings that are minimally informative. The whole point seems to be that as we are now in summer, no one should expect any real 'news' until the autumn, and that meanwhile, no one else is being investigated for Vatileaks other than Paolo Gabriele. Forty-two days since his arrest, and five months since Vatileaks first emitted its fetid ooze, that's all the Vatican has to say about it? Was it such a 'perfect scheme' that they seem to have made no progress in cracking it? Or is this all an elaborate ploy so that we shall all be amazed when the truth comes out when we least expect it?

    Vatileaks and IOR:
    'Don't expect anything till fall',
    Father Lombardi says

    by Salvatore Izzo


    VATICAN CITY, July 3 (Translated from AGI) - The formal interrogation of Paolo Gabriele is coming to an end, andd the Vatican magistrate will soon move into the preliminary investigation phase ofbthe charge of 'aggravated theft' which is all he is accused of for now. [Does it mean they will now start to 'formally' investigate any allegations and names Gabriele may have implicated? Could they have not started this as soon as they got any leads from him? What on earth did they find to talk about with him in 43 days when he is supposed to be a 'cooperative' subject? Have they learned anything useful from him at all?]

    "Investigating magistrate Piero Boonet will decide next week whether to release Gabriele on house arrest, and about putting him on trial", said Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi. "In any case, any proceedings will not begin until the autumn".

    Formally, he said, the Pope's former valet is the only person accused so far, "but others have been interrogated and it remains to be seen whether others will be charged".

    Meanhile, he adds, the three-man commission of cardinals continues its work and have now heard 28 persons. "It is foreseeable that they will make a report to the Pope within the month of July".

    Lombardi said that the 28 persons have been interrogated by the cardinals as well as by the investigating magistrate, usually separately, but in some cases, together. "All of them presented voluntaraily, and it was not necessary to issue any requests through the Italian police [which would have been necessary in order to summon witnesses or concerned parties who do not volunteer to be interrogated, and which implies that some of these 'volunteer witnesses' are Italian citizens].

    All of the inquiries so far, according to Fr. Lombardi, have taken place at the Vatican. He said the object of the 'auditions' and interrogations was to check out statements made by Gabriele - "to obtain verification and better understanding of the information acquired"

    But, he warned, "it must be kept in mind that the fact of having been questioned, as an 'informed' source, does not mean being suspected of anything".

    Lombardi also made clear that the selection of a new president for IOR is not expected to be made until the autumn. "It needs to be a good search done calmly and thought out well".

    "Gotti Tedeschi is no longer president, and we are looking for a new one, and this will take time, because candidates will require time to respond to questionnaires".

    This week is an important one for Vatican finances, because the 15 cardinals around the world who are in charge of reviewing and issuing the Vatican's annual financial statements (for 2011) and the budget for 2012 have been meeting at the Vatican and are expected to release those statements later this week.

    At the same time, Moneyval, the Council of Europe's financial watchdog group, is holding its plenary session in Strasbourg during which it is supposed to decide by tomorrow whether Vatican City State is sufficiently compliant with international standards to combat money laundering and financing of terrorism. [Another news report underscores that Fr. Lombardi made it clear this evaluation is part of an ongoing process by Moneyval and not the final word.]

    Leading the Vatican delegation to Strasbourg is Mons. Ettore Balestrero, unxder-secretary for relations with states.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 04/07/2012 01:24]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.181
    Post: 7.681
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 04:10



    I've finally translated the interview given by Sandro Magister about the appointment of Mons. Mueller to be the new CDF Prefect, which I have posted below. But meanwhile, I've looked over quite a few texts by Mons. Mueller that I have translated in the past, and I find this presentation of JESUS OF NAZARETH Vol. II an excellent introduction to how he thinks and expresses himself, especially from a man who chose 'DOMINUS IESUS' to be his episcopal motto in 2002...

    The 'Jesus' books of Benedict XVI:
    Not an intellectual exercise but
    simply to announce God in Jesus

    Excerpts from the presentation of
    Mons. Gerhard Ludwig Mueller
    Bishop of Regensburg
    Translated from the 3/24/11 issue of




    Editor's Note: Here are excerpts from the lecture given by the Bishop of Regensburg at the presentation Thursday night of JESUS OF NAZARETH Vol II at the Basilica of St. John Lateran in the 'Dialoghi nella Cattedrale' series presented by the Diocese of Rome.

    In the sixth year of the Pontificate of His Holiness Benedict XVI, the second of his three volumes dedicated to the figure of Jesus has been published. The first part of the trilogy was dedicated to the period "from the baptism on the Jordan to the Transfiguration', and the second one which came out earlier this month, is subtitled "From the entry into Jerusalem to the Resurrection".

    In nine chapters, the Holy Father elaborates the great scenes of the Passion of Christ. These are key scenes to understand the person of Jesus and his mission: Who is Jesus with respect to God his Father? And what does he mean to us?

    The author reflects and explains in detail the sense and the significance of the entry into Jerusalem and of the purification of the Temple; followed by the eschatological discourse on the end of the Temple and the advent of the pagan era; the washing of the feet; the priestly prayer; the Last Supper with the institution of the Eucharist, as the central sacrament of the Church; the trial of Jesus; his crucifixion, the deposition in the tomb and his subsequent resurrection; and finally, an analysis of the pronouncement in the Credo: "He ascended into heaven, seated at the right hand of the Father, and he will come again in glory".

    It is an imposing work of admirable commitment, which the Pope wished to assume alongside his already enormous incumbencies and responsibilities for the universal Church - and despite his venerable age.

    Some may ask whether the Pontiff would have done better to leave a work of strictly scientific character in the hands of professors of exegesis and history who are much younger and, according to them, more competent.

    Shouldn't he better face far more important tasks at a time when the boat of Peter is at the mercy of growing tides of secularism and when, in order to deal with the increasingly violent anti-clerical waves, the Church needs all of the attention of its helmsman?

    To such objections, I counter: Is it not precisely the task of St. Peter to call general attention to the only one who is able to arrest wind and wave, and to bring the boat of his Church to the secure port of eternity?

    To make the figure of Jesus accessible to men who are at risk of being carried away by the tempests of time and history, is undoubtedly an undertaking that goes far beyond the passion of an ex-professor of theology whose preferred occupation is writing books.

    Because this is not just one more book about Jesus. That the entire world would not suffice to contain all the books that one could write about Jesus was already apparent to the evangelist St. John in the first century (cfr Jn 21,22).

    Instead, the Pope has concerned himself directly with Jesus, and through him, our relationship with God.

    Despite the enormous importance of the Bible in the life of the Church, Christianity is not a religion of the book. Christian faith is an encounter with a person. And the totally unique thing about Jesus is that by getting close to him, I am dealing with God himself. At the same time, I know that I am perfectly understood and sustained by him in my own existential affairs, in my sufferings, hopes and fears.

    Jesus is decisive for the success or failure of my life. Jesus is true God, the Son in the trinitarian communion of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. But Jesus is also, through the Incarnation of the divine Word, a man like me, up to the death that he suffered on the cross to guarantee to us the prospect of eternal life.

    In the Gospel of John, it is stressed that the book was not written as a historical biography to inform us, with the aid of sociology and psychology, about the life and destiny of a historical personage, but rather "so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, Son of God, and because, by believing, you may have eternal life in his name" (Jn 20,31).

    Thus, even Pope Benedict XVI, in an era of growing doubts, of uncertainties on how to transmit the faith in a Europe that is so profoundly confused over its own Christian identity - without a measuring standard or a goal, without an origin or a future, in a situation of the general crisis of mankind - has also written this book so that men may orient themselves anew towards Jesus.

    Because only an orientation towards God-Man can save us, not becoming hardened in an ideology, in a mental construction with a human matrix, in a pax sovietica, pax americana or pax cinese, what have you, or a model of society that is purely economic and scientific.

    Indeed, however valuable the human intellect is, and however fides et ratio, like a couple of lovers, can be of no use to each other in a theory and practice of a world cut off from knowing God - with philosophy and ethics alone, we can never reach an absolute knowledge of the reality of the world and of man, nor lift ourselves enough to be our own redeemers.

    Fundamentalism and relativism are the twin brothers of subjectivism - faith as opinion or discretional decision of the subject - while the Christian profession is based on reality established by God himself, by the Son of God who became man: "There is no salvation through anyone else, nor is there any other name under heaven given to the human race by which we are to be saved" (Acts 4,12).

    Christianity is substantially and essentially a relationship between persons, not between a person and an idea or a moral law, or the objective spirit of law, or science, religion, culture and philosophy.

    Faith is the relationship of man with Jesus, and through him, with God, and as such, is a communion of life with God and a communion of life with all those who belong to him in the Church, as a communion of faith, hope and charity.

    My personality develops in relationship to my parents, my brothers and sisters, friends and teachers, and not to the idea of genitoriality, to the functional plane of teaching, to the structures of the educational system or the academic-university system. The relationship between persons is always preeminent with respect to the material sphere or factual elements, and this avoids that man 'loses his own soul'.

    As pastor of souls, the Holy Father wishes to encourage the doubters and reinforce all his brothers and sisters in their faith (cfr Luke 22,32). In fact, we can, with tranquillity, subject the Christian faith, Biblical witness, and the entire apostolic tradition and magisterium of the Catholic Church to the thorniest interrogation in history and to philosophical skepticism.

    This decantation by the Enlightenment and criticism of religion has highlighted in a more manifest and convincing manner that our faith is due to the real self-revelation of God and that our relationship with Jesus rests on a firm historical foundation.

    Critical philosophy and historico-critical methodology in Biblical exegesis, placed at the service of the science of faith, can confirm the historicity of Revelation and the reliability of the Gospels as the testimony of persons and of the story of Jesus, if they accept liberating themselves from the unfounded and a priori conviction that man is incapable of transcending his humanity.

    Our relationship with Jesus is a relationship of acknowledging his person under the sign of love: love not understood, obviously, as mere sentiment, alongside a rational confrontation with historical sources.

    Love in this case means accepting any other person without reservation and to experience at the same time that the other acknowledges and accepts us perfectly. Even now Jesus remains for many persons a model in the moral and humanitarian sense, and many identify themselves with him.

    But this unilateral identification with another does not yet signify friendship and love. It could still be simple narcissism, if I limit myself to instrumentalizing the other as a model for myself. In theological terms: Jesus is for us not just an exemplum, he is also donum.

    He gives himself to me as a divine presence in my heart and in my existential affairs and in the entire history of mankind. We live in God to the degree that he lives in us. Thus the encounter of love with Jesus is redemption and God's Shalom, not just because I as a a creature seek to identify myself with God, but because God identifies himself with his creature, and he loved us even when we were sinners (1Jn 4, 10-16).

    The risen Lord asks Peter, "Do you love me more than the others?" And three times Peter, acknowledging with full remorse his own betrayal of Jesus, responds, "You know that I love you". And Jesus entrusts his lambs and his sheep to him (cfr Jn 21m15-19).

    It is therefore supremely opportune that today, in Rome, glorious site of his martyrdom, Peter, together with Paul, gives witness anew of our desire to glorify God, working for his Kingdom unto death.

    The Successor of Peter, despite his advanced age, took on the labor on a trilogy which will amount to about a thousand pages, so that we may recognize the glory and freedom of children of God who, in Jesus, gave himself to us to a degree that transcends every human dimension, and so that we can identify the meaning of our life in Jesus's exhortation to follow him.

    Neither Prometheus-Hegel nor Sisyphus-Marx have been able to subject the world to the power of man. Their interpretations of history and of man cannot determine nor modify our life, because they have failed to recognize man in his being.

    Being is indisposable, and this goes back to God as the origin of a love that enlarges itself without limitations and without ever claiming anything in return: "You were ransomed from your futile conduct, handed on by your ancestors, not with perishable things like silver or gold but with the precious blood of Christ as of a spotless unblemished lamb" (1Pt 18-19).

    But the Savior and Redeemer does not make his apparition on the pages of the daily newspapers' cultural supplements and in consumerism with all its superficiality. All of man's attempts at self-redemption without cost are rooted in an abyss of crime and violence, spiritual emptiness and mortal tedium. The rejection of a God who acts in history and gives his revelation to man inevitably leads to the desperation of having to remain unredeemed.

    The will for salvation is manifested and becomes reality only in the kenosia [emptying himself] of the Son of God (Phil 2,5-11) for him who trusts with faith and love in the person of the Son sent by the Father to become man.

    To face the apparently invincible Goliath of relativism - intellectually and politically made militant and potentiated by the media - David, shepherd of the People of God, forges ahead, without weapons but full of imperturbable trust in God "in the name of the Lord' (1 Sam 17,45).

    The language and the reasoning of Benedict XVI have a simple and modest tone, like Paul's. It is not about asserting himself in brilliant discourses, nor abandoning himself to the intellectual pleasure of reflection, but of disseminating the announcement of God.

    Our respect for a mankind that is vacillating, skeptical, agnostic, disillusioned, is modelled after the love with which Jesus looked at the young man who asked him what he had to do to obtain eternal life (cfr Mt 19,16).

    And Paul suggests to witnesses and preachers of the Gospel the method for their mission: "My message and my proclamation were not with persuasive (words of) wisdom, but with a demonstration of spirit and power, so that your faith might rest not on human wisdom but on the power of God" (1Cor 4,ff).

    It has been customary to categorize the attitude of young people, but even of intellectuals in the Christian countries of Europe, into problem and crisis. In broad terms, this is a precise valuation. Notwithstanding, we continue to see the miracle of young people who emerge undamaged from the omnipotent mainstreaming of anti-Christian idolatry and, perfectly lucid in mind and with hearts full of love, ask, "Show us Jesus".

    Indeed, all of us must ask ourselves what we think of the Son of man. "You are Christ, son of the living God", Peter professed (Mt 16,16). In Peter, not only the mission of the evangelical announcement has been transferred to the Church, but he assures that to the end of time, he will firmly resist all the pressing attacks from the gates of hell.

    Let us thank the Holy Father tonight for his book. It is a testimonial rendered to Jesus, author and perfector of our faith (Heb 12,2). whom we shall greet anew with jubilation this Easter.


    Mons. Mueller and two officials of the Institut Papst Benedikt XVI present drafts of one of the early volumes of the Opera Omnia to the Pope back in 2008.

    I must admit to an ulterior motive for rejoicing that the Holy Father did appoint Mons. Mueller to the CDF and not somebody else. Now he will have another German friend (besides Mons. Gaenswein) who presumably thinks like him and whom he will be able to meet with frequently (I should think they will be meeting more than the once a week regular meeting over CDF business, just as Cardinal Ratzinger met regularly with John Paul II in their time on Tuesdays as well as those Friday 'work' meetings) - in short, a necessary counterweight, I believe, to Cardinal Bertone.


    Sandro Magister on Mueller at CDF:
    'An innovative appointment
    that will strengthen Benedict XVI'

    Interview by Federica Ghizzardi
    Translated from

    July 3, 2012


    Left, Cardinal Ratzinger was among those who consecrated Mueller bishop of Regensburg in November 2002; right, Mueller in Regensburg Cathedral last Saturday when he ordained five deacons as priests. He left thereafter for Rome, where he was when the Vatican made the announcement Monday.

    Mons. Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Bishop of Regensburg, is the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The decree signed by Benedict XVI, who had served in this position for 24 years alongside John Paul II, was made known simultaneously at noon Monday in Rome, at the Sant'Uffizio [CDF offices], and in Regensburg.

    Mons. Müller succeeds Cardinal William Joseph Levada, who presented his resignation when he turned 75 more than a year ago. Mueller, now elevated to the rank of Archbishop, will certainly be made a cardinal at the next consistory (possibly next spring) will also become, ex officio, president of the Ecclesia Dei Pontifical Commission, the Pontifical Biblical Commission and the International Theological Commission.

    Sixty-four years old last December, he has been a professor at the Maximilian Ludwig University of Munich, and has been guest professor in many universities abroad.

    The Pope's esteem for him is evident in that he entrusted him with the task of publishing his Complete Writings as Joseph Ratzinger. We sought out experienced Vatican observer and commentator Sandro Magister for his comments.

    What do you think of this appointment made by Benedict XVI?
    It shows Benedict XVI's pre-eminent interest that the CDF Prefect should be someone in whom he has absolute trust and very much in tune with his own theological vision.

    When then Archbishop William was named CDF Prefect in 2005, it was said that Benedict XVI wanted the CDF Prefect to be a pastor above all. Mons. Mueller is also a theologian. Has something changed in the Pope's orientation? [But Levada is a theologian as well. He completed all his formative studies in Rome at the North American College and the Pontifical Gregorian University where he got his doctorate in theology, magna cum laude. He went back to the USA where he taught theology until he was sent by his bishop to work at the CDF from 1976 to 1982. Although he only worked about a year with Cardinal Ratzinger, the latter was impressed enough that when he was named by John Paul II to develop the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Levada was one of the seven bishops he named to the editorial committee for the catechism. Somewhere, somehow, someone must write an appreciation of this man and the solid, faithful service he rendered to the Church and to Benedict XVI.]
    I would not say so. Certainly, the new Prefect is someone with whom the Pope can work closely and confidentially. And besides having been Bishop of Regensburg, he is also a well-qualified theologian. Not to mention that he was entrusted by the Pope to publish his Complete Writings.

    So was this a choice dictated by 'empathy' and closeness?
    Of course. But it must be said that this is not the first case of such a choice made by the Pope for the Curia. Indeed, one might call this choice as the third man in the 'small team' of Curial officials who have the Pope's full confidence and with whom he must work closely.

    Besides Mueller, the other two are Cardinal Marc Ouellet, who is in charge of selecting bishops around the world, and Cardinal Kurt Koch, of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity. Koch, Ouellet and Mueller are a trio that have great importance for the governance of the universal Church, and these are the men the Pope trusts most. [So, Mr. Magister, where does Cardinal Bertone fit into all this?]

    Do you think that the idea of nationality also underlies this choice? Repubblica has noted that 'he's one more German beside the Pope at this difficult time'. What do you think?
    Mueller is not just German, he is also Bavarian. But Koch is Swiss, although German-speaking, but Ouellet is Canadian. The Pope's closeness to them is more than just geographical and cultural affinity, because they have all arrived at a theological vision that is very similar to the Pope's and which allows them to be rally a team with him. [And George Pell, Australian, would fit in with them, if he ever does get a Curial appointment that won't be torpedoed the way his nomination to Bishops was! In the actual Curia, I would not count out Amato (Italian), Canizares (Spanish) and Raymond Burke, who is now the ranking American in the Curia, and absolutely, proudly orthodox! Moreover, both Amato and Canizares are ex-CDF.]

    What are the salient points of this theologtical vision that they share with the Pope?
    It's a vision that makes fruitful the best that Catholic theology has produced in the 20th century. It would not be amiss to say that HJans Urs von Balthasar, Jean Danielou and Henri de Lubac would be in good company among them.

    In an interview with this newspaper in August 2010, Mons. Mueller said: "Only the principle of love, as an internal and inseparable unity of reason and feeling, intelligence and affection, can overcome the contradicitions of modern reason"...
    It is certainly shared by the Pope. What must be emphasized perhaps is that this theological current is not distinguished only by its rationality, but is greatly inspired by ghe great recovery, in the mid-20th century, of the thinking of the Fathers of the Church. Also fundamental to them is the centrality of liturgy and an interpreetation of Sacred Scripture that is nor purely historico-critical but canonical - inspiared by that overall spiritual sense that was typical of the great scholars of Scripture in the Middle Ages.

    In this sense, do you think this appointment was 'innovative'?
    Absolutely. Because the new CDF Prefect isnot only who can protect the 'purity' of Catholic doctrine but a theologian with the competenced and vision to promote the faith in the modern context. And this comes at a time when we are preparing for Benedict XVI's Year of Faith aimed precisely at doing that.

    The new Prefect will also head the Ecclesia Dei Commission which is handling the reconciliation attempt with the Lefebvrians. What line do you think Mons. Mueller will take?
    The same that Papa Ratzinger has been courageously carrying on, defying the resistance there there is even and above all with thie ?Church, where there are strong ecumenical voices who only mouth the wrods about Christian unity they claim to be very open about this with respect to the Protestant communities whereas they are not only closed off but are contemptuous of the traditionalists who have been separated from the Church of Rome for some time. Like the Lefebvrians precisely - who can and should be the object of efforts at reconciliation.

    Müller is a disciple and friend of the Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutierrez who is considered one of the early movers of liberation theology. What do you think of this association?
    This fixation on the doctrine of Gurierrez has been used as a weapon by those who did not want Mueller to head the CDF, but actually, if you look more carefully, you will see that although Gutierrez was certainly one of the most famous advocates of this theology, he was the only one of these leaders who was never condemned or censured by the CDF, because his theology remained within the bounds of orthodoxy. Whereas much of liberation theology soon drifted into Marxist theory and practice that are simply and absolutely incompatible with Catholic doctrine. On the other hand, it also looked into themes and confronted problems in ways that were considered positive. Both Mons. Muelleer as well as Cardinal Ratzinger himself were critical only of the negative aspects of liberation theology.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 16:07]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.183
    Post: 7.682
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 20:14



    So begins summer 2012
    for Pope Benedict XVI

    Adapted from

    July 4, 2012


    Right photo: The Pope speaks to the new mayor of Castel Gandolo, Milvia Monachesi.

    Pope Benedict XVI has begun his annual summer 'rest' which will last to the end of July. He arrived yesterday afternoon at the Apostolic Palace in Castel Gandolfo where he will stay for the rest of the summer, except for a three-day trip to Lebanon in September.

    For more than three centuries, Popes have come to this lakeside hilltown near Rome for long or short breaks from the Vatican. [This is the third year in a row that Benedict XVI has decided to spend the entire summer in Castel Gandolfo. In 2005-2009, he spent the first part of his vacation in various Alpine locations in northern Italy - Les Combes in Val D'Aosta, northwest Italy three times, and in Lorenzago di Cadore and Bressanone-Brizen in northwest Italy.]



    In his remarks yesterday to the residents who awaited his arrival in the square facing the Apostolic Palace, he called it "this little city surrounded by the beauty of creation".

    "Dear friends, I am glad to have arrived here for my vacation and I wish everyone good rest and good refreshment for the summer. We hope that we can renew ourselves spiritually and physically renew ourselves in this in this little city surrounded by the beauty of creation. Thank you for your presence, and I wish you all a good vacation".

    The Pope will not have any official events in July, but will lead the Sunday noontime Angelus as usual. )n Monday, he will be visiting the motherhouse of the Society of the Divine Word (SVD) fathers in Nemi, where in 1964, he spent a few days as part of a Vatican-II working group that was drafting the Council declaration on Church mission in the modern world.

    And on Sunday, July 15, he will be visiting another town of the Castelli Romani, Frascati, where he will celebrate Mass at the diocesan cathedral.

    Addendum from the item in OR for tomorrow's issue (7/5):
    The Pope arrived in Castel Gandolfo around 6 pm by helicopter from the Vatican, accompanied by Archbishop James Harvey and Bishop Paolo De Nicolo, prefect and regent, respectively of the Pontifical Household; and his two private secretaries, Monsignors Georg Gaenswein and Alfred Xuereb.

    They were welcomed at the heliport of the Pontifical Villas by Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, president of the Vatican Governatorate and its secretary-general, Mons. Gabriele Cacccia; the Bishop of Albano, Marcello Semeraro; Fr. Josef Mai, deputy director of the Vatican Observatory; Milvia Monachesi, elected mayor of Castel Gandolfo last month; Fr. Pietro Diletti, parish priest of San Tomaso da Villanova; and the director of the Pontifical Villas, Saverio Petrillo.



    A couple of additional photos from the news agencies that are of better quality than the ones above taken from the OR and videocaps off Rome Reports:




    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 19:35]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.184
    Post: 7.683
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 20:37


    Wednesday, July 4, 13th Week in Ordinary Time

    ST. ISABEL (Elizabeth) OF PORTUGAL (b Spain 1271, d Portugal 1336), Queen, Mother, Widow, Lay Franciscan
    Isabel was born in Spain to the future Pedro III, king of Aragon, when her grandfather Jaime was king. Her great grandfather was Frederick III of the Holy Roman Empire, and she was a great-niece of St. Elizabeth of Hungary, for whom she was named. She had a very pious upbringing which was her best preparation when, at 12, she was given in marriage to Diniz, king of Portugal, with whom she had two children. As queen, she continued her life of piety, now amplified by her generous charity to pilgrims, strangers, the sick and the poor, as well as devotion to her husband whose infidelities constituted a public scandal, and for whom she prayed to be reconciled to God. Eventually, he gave up his life of sin. Before that, however, she had to step in to make peace between him and their son, the future king, who went to war against his father because he felt he was being passed over in favor of his illegitimate children. She also reconciled her nephew Fernando, king of Aragon, and another nephew, Jaime, who claimed the throne; and later her own son Alfonso, now king of Portugal, against his son-in-law, king of Castilla. When her husband died, she became a lay Franciscan and retired to a Poor Clare convent she had set up in Coimbra.
    Readings for today's Mass:
    www.usccb.org/bible/readings/070412.cfm



    WITH THE POPE TODAY

    The Holy Father met with

    - Caridnal Marc Ouellet, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops (weekly meeting).


    Pope renews confidence
    in Cardinal Bertone

    Translated from

    July 4, 2012

    The Vatican today released the text of a letter written by the Holy Father to Cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone before he left for Castel Gandolfo:




    To my Venerated and Dear Brother
    Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone

    On the eve of my departure to spend the summer in Castel Gandolfo, I wish to epxress to you my profound acknowledgment for your discreet nearness and for your enlightened counsel that I have found of particular help in these last months.

    Having noted with regret the unjust criticisms raised against your person, I wish to renew to you an attestation of my personal confidence, as I had occasion to do in my letter of January 15, 2010, whose contents remain unchanged for me.

    In entrusting your ministry to the maternal intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Help of Christians, and the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul, it is my pleasure to send you, along with a brotherly greeting, the Apostolic Blessing as a token of every good wish.

    From the Vatican
    July 2, 2012




    NB: The January 2010 letter was the Pope's reply to Cardinal Bertone's letter offering to resign when he turned 75 in December 2009.
    IMHO, this is something the Pope had to do - by expressing his sentiments publicly at this time, he ensures more or less that idle minds that are the devil's workshop will not spend the next three months of the summer news doldrums concocting all sorts of baloney to try and keep Vatileaks going in the absence of any concrete developments to report.


    A little tribute to
    America's wounded warriors


    On this Fourth of July, I wish to offer prayers, gratitude and high admiration for the men and women who serve their country in military service, but especially for the wounded warriors - countless of them - who have come back from serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, many having volunteered to serve more than one tour of duty and suffered the worst battle injuries (usually losing arms and legs, or becoming paraplegics), who go on to live useful lives with new prosthetic limbs or other devices in ways one cannot normally imagine (running a bike marathon for charity on two metal legs from the hip down, or playing the piano as a professional band musician with a left prosthetic arm and hand).

    And yet, their uniform attitude seems to be "Despite all this, I do not regret that I served in the military" and they all share an abiding faith in God. I thank Fox News TV for constantly bringing their stories - and their faces and voices - to public attention. IMHO, these men and women are exemplary Christians and I hope some of them who are Catholic will eventually earn appropriate recognition for saintliness.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 19:43]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.185
    Post: 7.684
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 21:35


    Council of Europe´s
    MONEYVAL Committee adopts
    report on the Holy See

    From the site of the Council of Europe
    www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/
    July 4, 2012

    The Council of Europe MONEYVAL Committee today adopted, during its 39th plenary meeting, the first evaluation report on the Holy See (including the Vatican City State).

    ['Adopting' the report means it has accepted the evaluation submitted by the Moneyval team, which made its second on-site inspection in April to check on measures instituted by the Holy See against money laundering and funding of terrorism through its financial operations. However, the rest of the news release also indicates the report may be subject to amendment before being finalized.]

    All States evaluated by MONEYVAL have the opportunity to check the accuracy of the amended version of the report after it has been adopted, and to provide any comments for publication. The state should provide its response within one month of receipt of the amended report.

    The report on the Holy See will now be finalised in line with plenary decisions and sent to the Vatican authorities. Once any comments are provided, MONEYVAL will publish the report as adopted today and any comments from the Holy See on its website.

    In practical terms, this means that it will not be publicly known till then what the April inspection team concluded. However, preliminary leaks have suggested that the Vatican may have been found to be non-compliant or not sufficiently compliant with 9 out of 40 criteria on the Moneyval checklist, which is reportedly encouraging because it is less than the critical maximum 10 out of 40 points... Nor is this the final word on whether the Holy See will get into the 'white list'. More evaluation will follow on concrete responses made to any non-compliant or not sufficiently compliant points cited in this evaluation.


    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 00:47]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.186
    Post: 7.685
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 04/07/2012 23:56


    This is definitely the most exciting development in theoretical science in quite some time - the first of this millennium. There's always been controversy over the term 'God particle' used for this until-now most elusive of sub-atomic particles, but I've always thought the fact that someone thought to call it that was significant in itself. As significant as ongoing research into what has been called the 'God spot' or 'God module' in the human brain that is thought to predispose man to think of transcendence, another way of saying that God is inscribed in the human heart.

    Scientists prove
    'God particle' exists -
    or something like it

    A closer look at the Higgs boson that helps
    explain what gives matter size and shape



    BERLIN, July 4 (AP) — Scientists working at the world’s biggest atom smasher near Geneva have announced the discovery of a new subatomic particle that looks remarkably like the long-sought Higgs boson.

    Sometimes called the “God particle” because its existence is fundamental to the creation of the universe, the hunt for the Higgs involved thousands of scientists from all over the world.

    School physics teaches that everything is made up of atoms, and inside atoms are electrons, protons and neutrons. They, in turn, are made of quarks and other subatomic particles. Scientists have long puzzled over how these minute building blocks of the universe acquire mass. Without mass, particles wouldn’t hold together and there would be no matter.

    One theory proposed by British physicist Peter Higgs and teams in Belgium and the United States in the 1960s is that a new particle must be creating a “sticky” field that acts as a drag on other particles. The atom-smashing experiments at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, have now captured a glimpse of what appears to be just such a Higgs-like particle.

    The Higgs is part of many theoretical equations underpinning scientists’ understanding of how the world came into being. If it doesn’t exist, then those theories would need to be fundamentally overhauled. The fact that it apparently does exist means scientists have been on the right track with their theories.

    But there’s a twist: the measurements seem to diverge slightly from what would be expected under the so-called Standard Model of particle physics. This is exciting for scientists because it opens the possibility to potential new discoveries including a theory known as “super-symmetry” where particles don’t just come in pairs — think matter and anti-matter — but quadruplets, all with slightly different characteristics.

    CERN’s atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider, alone cost some $10 billion to build and run. This includes the salaries of thousands of scientists and support staff around the world who collaborated on the two experiments that independently pursued the Higgs.

    Were there any practical results from this discovery? Not directly. But the massive scientific effort that led up to the discovery has paid off in other ways, one of which was the creation of the World Wide Web. CERN scientists developed it to make it easier to exchange information among each other.

    The vast computing power needed to crunch all of the data produced by the atom smasher has also boosted the development of distributed — or cloud — computing, which is now making its way into mainstream services. Advances in solar energy capture, medical imaging and proton therapy — used in the fight against cancer — have also resulted from the work of particle physicists at CERN and elsewhere.

    “This is just the beginning,” says James Gillies, a spokesman for CERN. Scientists will keep probing the new particle until they fully understand how it works.

    In doing so they hope to understand the 96 percent of the universe that remains hidden from view. This may result in the discovery of new particles and even hitherto unknown forces of nature.


    Has physics found
    its 'Holy Grail' (for now)?

    By DENNIS OVERBYE

    July 4, 2012



    ASPEN, Colorado — Physicists working at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider said Wednesday that they had discovered a new subatomic particle that looks for all the world like the Higgs boson, a potential key to an understanding of why elementary particles have mass and indeed to the existence of diversity and life in the universe.

    “I think we have it,” Rolf-Dieter Heuer, the director general of CERN, said in an interview from his office outside Geneva, calling the discovery “a historic milestone.”

    His words signaled what is probably the beginning of the end for one of the longest, most expensive searches in the history of science. If scientists are lucky, the discovery could lead to a new understanding of how the universe began.

    Dr. Heuer and others said that it was too soon to know for sure whether the new particle, which weighs in at 125 billion electron volts, one of the heaviest subatomic particles yet, fits the simplest description given by the Standard Model, the theory that has ruled physics for the last half-century, or whether it is an impostor, a single particle or even the first of many particles yet to be discovered.

    The latter possibilities are particularly exciting to physicists since they could point the way to new deeper ideas, beyond the Standard Model, about the nature of reality. For now, some physicists are calling it a “Higgslike” particle.

    “It’s great to discover a new particle, but you have to bfind out what its properties are,” said John Ellis, a theorist at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

    Joe Incandela, of the University of California, Santa Barbara, a spokesman for one of two groups reporting data on Wednesday, called the discovery “very, very significant.”

    “It’s something that may, in the end, be one of the biggest observations of any new phenomena in our field in the last 30 or 40 years, going way back to the discovery of quarks, for example,” he said.

    Here at the Aspen Center for Physics, a retreat for scientists that will celebrate its 50th birthday on Saturday, the sounds of cheers and popping corks reverberated early Wednesday against the Sawatch Range through the Roaring Fork Valley of the Rockies, as bleary-eyed physicists watched their colleagues read off the results in a webcast from CERN.

    It was a scene duplicated in Melbourne, Australia, where physicists had gathered for a major conference, as well as in Los Angeles, Chicago, Princeton, New York, London and beyond — everywhere that members of a curious species have dedicated their lives and fortunes to the search for their origins in a dark universe.

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, a physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, said: “I was really impressed. It’s a triumphant day for fundamental physics. Now some fun begins!”

    At CERN itself, 1,000 people stood in line all night to get into the auditorium, according to Guido Tonelli, a CERN physicist who said the atmosphere was like a rock concert. Peter Higgs, the University of Edinburgh theorist for whom the boson is named, entered the meeting to a standing ovation.

    Confirmation of the Higgs boson or something very much like it would constitute a rendezvous with destiny for a generation of physicists who have believed in the boson for half a century without ever seeing it. And it affirms a grand view of a universe ruled by simple and elegant and symmetrical laws, but in which everything interesting in it, like ourselves, is a result of flaws or breaks in that symmetry.

    According to the Standard Model, which has ruled physics for 40 years, the Higgs boson is the only visible and particular manifestation of an invisible force field, a cosmic molasses that permeates space and imbues elementary particles that would otherwise be massless with mass. Particles wading through it would gain heft.

    Without this Higgs field, as it is known, or something like it, physicists say all the elementary forms of matter would zoom around at the speed of light, flowing through our hands like moonlight. There would be neither atoms nor life.

    Physicists said that they would probably be studying the new Higgs particle for years. Any deviations from the simplest version of the boson — and there are hints of some already — could open a gateway to new phenomena and deeper theories that answer questions left hanging by the Standard Model: What, for example, is the dark matter that provides the gravitational scaffolding of galaxies? And why is the universe made of matter instead of antimatter?

    “If the boson really is not acting standard, then that will imply that there is more to the story — more particles, maybe more forces around the corner,” Neal Weiner, a theorist at New York University, wrote in an e-mail. “What that would be is anyone’s guess at the moment.”

    One intriguing candidate for the next theory they have been on the watch for is called supersymmetry, “SUSY” for short, which would come with a whole new laundry list of particles to be discovered, one of which might be the source of dark matter. In supersymmetry there are at least two Higgs bosons.

    Dr. Incandela said, “The whole world thinks there is one Higgs, but there could be many of them.”

    Michael Turner, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago and the chairman of the physics center board, said, “This is a big moment for particle physics and a crossroads — will this be the high water mark or will it be the first of many discoveries that point us toward solving the really big questions that we have posed?”

    Wednesday’s announcement is also an impressive opening act for the Large Hadron Collider, the world’s biggest physics machine, which collides protons and only began operating two years ago. It is still running at only half-power.

    Physicists had been holding their breath and perhaps icing the champagne ever since last December. Two teams of about 3,000 physicists each — one named Atlas, led by Fabiola Gianotti, and the other CMS, led by Dr. Incandela — operate giant detectors in the collider, sorting the debris from the primordial fireballs left after proton collisions.

    Last winter they both reported hints of the same particle. They were not able, however, to rule out the possibility that it was a statistical fluke.

    Since then the collider has more than doubled the number of collisions it has recorded.

    The new results capped three weeks of feverish speculation and Internet buzz as the physicists, who had been sworn to secrecy, did a breakneck analysis of some 800 trillion proton-proton collisions over the last two years. They were racing to get ready for a major conference in Melbourne that started on Wednesday, where they had promised an update on the Higgs search.

    In the end, the CERN council, which consists of representatives from each of CERN’s 20 member states, decided that the potentially historic announcement should come from the lab’s own turf first.

    Up until last weekend, physicists from inside were reporting that they themselves did not know what the outcome would be, though many were having fun with the speculation.

    “HiggsRumors” became one of the most popular hashtags on Twitter. The particle also acquired its own iPhone app, a game called “Agent Higgs.” Expectations soared when it was learned that the five surviving originators of the Higgs boson theory had been invited to the CERN news conference.

    On the eve of the announcement, in what was an embarrassing moment for the lab where the Web was invented, a video of Dr. Incandela making his statement was posted to the Internet and then quickly withdrawn. Dr. Incandela said he had made a series of video presentations with alternate conclusions so that the video producers would not know the right answer ahead of time, but the one that was right just happened to get posted.

    But the December signal was no fluke.

    Like Omar Sharif materializing out of a distant blur of heated air into a man on a camel in “Lawrence of Arabia,” what was once a hint of a signal had grown over the last year, until it practically jumped off the chart. “I believe it now; I didn’t before,” said a physicist who was one of the first to see the new results but was not authorized to discuss them.

    The new particle has a mass of about 125.3 billion electron volts, in the units of mass and energy — Einstein showed they are the same — that are favored by physicists, about as much as a whole barium atom, according to the CMS group, and 126 billion according to Atlas.

    Both groups said that the likelihood that their signal was a result of a chance fluctuation was less than one chance in 3.5 million, so-called “five sigma,” which is the gold standard in physics for a discovery.

    On that basis, Dr. Heuer said that he had decided only Tuesday afternoon to call the Higgs result a “discovery.”

    He said, “I know the science, and as director general I can stick out my neck.”

    Dr. Incandela’s and Dr. Gianotti’s presentations were repeatedly interrupted by applause as they showed slide after slide of data bumps rising like mountains from the sea.

    Dr. Gianotti said at one point: “Why are you applauding? I’m not done yet. This is just beginning. There is more to come.”

    She noted that the mass of the putative Higgs made it easy to study its many behaviors and channels. “So,” she said, “thanks, nature.”

    Gerald Guralnik, one of the founders of the Higgs theory, said he was glad to be at a physics meeting “where there is applause like a football game.”

    Asked to comment after the announcements, Dr. Higgs seemed overwhelmed, saying, “For me, its really an incredible thing that’s happened in my lifetime.”

    In quantum theory, which is the language of particle physicists, elementary particles are divided into two rough categories: fermions, which are bits of matter like electrons, and bosons, which are bits of energy and can transmit forces, like the photon that transmits light.

    Dr. Higgs was one of six physicists, working in three independent groups, who in 1964 invented the notion of the cosmic molasses, or Higgs field. The others were Tom Kibble of Imperial College, London; Carl Hagen of the University of Rochester; Dr. Guralnik of Brown University; and Francois Englert and Robert Brout, both of Université Libre de Bruxelles.

    One implication of their theory was that this cosmic molasses, normally invisible and, of course, odorless, would produce its own quantum particle if hit hard enough, by the right amount of energy. The particle would be fragile and fall apart within a millionth of a second in a dozen different ways depending upon its own mass.

    Unfortunately, the theory did not say how much this particle should weigh, which is what made it so hard to find. The pesky particle eluded researchers at a succession of particle accelerators, including the Large Electron Positron Collider at CERN, which closed down in 2000, and the Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, or Fermilab, in Batavia, Ill., which shut down last year.

    Along the way the Higgs boson achieved a notoriety rare for abstract physics. To the eternal dismay of his colleagues, Leon Lederman, the former director of Fermilab, called it the “God particle,” in his book of the same name, later quipping that he had wanted to call it “the goddamn particle.”

    Finding the missing boson was one of the main goals of the Large Hadron Collider.

    Both Dr. Heuer and Dr. Gianotti said they had not expected the search to succeed so quickly, a tribute, they said, to the people who had built the collider and the detectors and learned to run them efficiently. “It’s truly amazing,” said Lisa Randall, a prominent Harvard theorist.

    Dr. Heuer recently extended the current run of the collider an extra three months, to the end of this year, during which the experimenters say they expect to triple their data on the new particle, narrowing its possible identities.

    The collider will then shut down for two years for major repairs. When it starts up again, theories of both inner space and outer space could be up for grabs.

    Although they have never been seen, Higgslike fields play an important role in theories of the universe and in string theory. Under certain conditions, according to the strange accounting of Einsteinian physics, they can become suffused with energy that exerts an antigravitational force. Such fields have been proposed as the source of an enormous burst of expansion, known as inflation, early in the universe, and, possibly, as the secret of the dark energy that now seems to be speeding up the expansion of the universe.

    Knowing more about the new particle will help put those theories on firmer ground, Dr. Turner of Chicago said.

    So far, the physicists admit, they know little. The CERN results are mostly based on measurements of two or three of the dozen different ways, or “channels,” by which a Higgs boson could be produced and then decay.

    There are hints, but only hints so far, that some of the channels are overproducing the Higgs while others might be underproducing, clues maybe that there is more than the Standard Model at work.

    “This could be the first in a ring of discoveries,” Dr. Tonelli said.

    CERN will be examining the rest of the channels over the coming months and years, and the idea that the Standard Model could be cracking is a prospect that physicists find thrilling. Only time, and a few more trillion proton collisions, will tell.

    In an e-mail, Maria Spiropulu, a professor at the California Institute of Technology who works with the CMS team at CERN, wrote about the Higgs: “I personally do not want it to be standard model anything — I don’t want it to be simple or symmetric or as predicted. I want us all to have been dealt a complex hand that will send me (and all of us) in a (good) loop for a long time.” [i.e., God is inscrutable and will always be. Every new discovery appears to yield more questions... I'd love for Joseph Ratzinger to have an occasion to comment on this latest development with his acute theological insight!]


    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 04/07/2012 23:58]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.187
    Post: 7.686
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 04:44


    By those happenstances of synchronicity, there's a news report today about the Big Bang that could have been the physical (according to the laws of physics) explanation for the Resurrection of Christ, just as a Big Bang had marked the birth of the cosmos. In both cases, it was a phenomenon of energy in the form of light - materializing the physical universe on the one hand, and on the other, dematerializing the Body of Christ from within its Shroud and rematerializing it according to the law of conservation of mass and energy... Not for the first time, one is struck that God's first word of creation was "Let there be light"!

    How the Body of Christ
    could have dematerialized
    from the Shroud in a Big Bang

    by Marco Tosatti
    Translated from the Italian service of

    July 4, 2012


    In a recent study, Italian physicist Giuseppe Baldacchini says that the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin as Christ's burial shroud is confirmed by the laws of physics as they are known today, specifically by the theory of annihilation.

    Baldacchini is a physicist who has held various positions of responsibility at ENEA (the Italian agency for new technologies and energy) based in Frascati. At the same time, he has been a passionate scholar and researcher on the Shroud, and has now published his conclusions and reflections in a 25-page paper (including 2-1/2 pages of references] entitled 'Religion, Christianity and the Shroud' available online in Italian) http://www.sindone.info/BALDAKKI.PDF
    [Baldacchini was also one of the co-authors of the ENEA paper published last December reporting the result of 10 years of research into how the image on the Shroud could have been produced. A report on the paper was posted on Page 271 of this thread on 12/15/11.]


    [I will anticipate Tosatti and translate here Baldacchini's major conclusions as stated in his abstract of the paper:

    In the light of what is known to science today, the Shroud of Turin is the funerary wrapping of Jesus Christ as narrated in the Gospels. Careful scientific studies have demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that it is not a fake. Moreover, the most widely credited scientific hypothesis about it today cites a process of radiant energy emission that is compatible with the Resurrection. Evidence of this phenomenon [a body leaving the shroud by no explainable means] is visible on the Shroud which was a mute witness to the most important event that has taken place in human history.

    He proposes a fascinating hypothesis to respond to a series of questions about how the images on the Shroud could have been formed, and how the body within it could have 'disappeared'.

    Baldacchini starts out with two working hypotheses: that the Shroud was a medieval hoax that has been used by the Catholic Church for devotional practices and/or religious propaganda like many relics; or that it authentic and that it truly contained the cadaver of Jesus Christ after his death on the Cross and is therefore a 'witness' of his Resurrection.

    "The Shroud is a blanket made of old linen measuring about 4.4 X 1.1 meters on which there are many marks, among them a faint corporeal image (IC) front and back, and stains caused by organic and inorganic liquids. In recent decades, it has been shown that the IC is neither a design or painting executed by any known technique, and some of the reddish marks are of human blood" (Antonacci, 2000), (Wilson, 2010).

    "However," Baldacchini points out, "we cannot exclude that it could be fake, so let us suppose that it is a medieval fakery carried out by the most brilliant counterfeiter that has ever lived or that has ever been known," It would mean, however, that the author, or authors, of the hoax knew quite a lot of present-day technologies and information long before they were invented or discovered.

    Baldacchini lists 11 determinative scientific elements that make him conclude the Shroud is not fake. Because of space limitations, we cannot list all 11 here, but we ask you to refer to the integral text of Baldacchini's paper.

    The scholar points out that "The Shroud does not contain any trace of putrescent gases or liquids produced naturally by a human body 40 hours after death, and therefore, the corpse was no longer there before those 40 hours, but it was in it long enough for the bloodstains to liquefy after initial coagulation, in the process of hemolysis".

    Moreover, he points out that "The body could not have been removed manually - since, based on the bloodstains found, there is no evidence at all of movement".

    So how did the body disappear? "The only phenomenon known to physics so far which can lead to the complete disappearance of mass by conversion to its equivalent energy is annihilation of matter by antimatter (AMA) which is reproducible today only at the subatomic level in laboratories specializing in elementary particles. But it was the dominant process right after the Big Bang, the event that marked the initial existence of our universe."

    He says that the annihilation theory also satisfies the requirements of preceding hypotheses: "Only a small fraction of the energy corresponding to the mass is released, although the entire physical body itself is annihilated in order to reconstitute itself as it was outside the Shroud".

    The preceding hypotheses he cites are that of 'radiant energy burst' (REB) along with that of 'mechanically transparent body' (MTB), with parts of both accommodated in the 'historically consistent method' (HCM).

    All these hypotheses were elaborated in recent years to account for the disappearance of the body, which could not have been actually removed from the Shroud. "So, the body of Jesus Christ became 'transparent' to the Shroud while it was emitting radiant energy as the MTB hypothesis says, and emitted some amount of radiant energy as the REB says, without the problems raised by the HCM" (mainly, that the energy released would have amounted to a nuclear explosion that would have blown up all of Jerusalem). [I must go back to translate Baldacchini's summations of these hypotheses to make them more clear and relevant to his discussion.]

    But the physicist also says, "The AMA hypothesis does not tell us anything other than that the body dematerialized within the Shroud and rematerialized elsewhere, dead or alive, which makes no difference to physical law, but it does not contradict the Gospel accounts that describe him as resurrected and alive".

    The chemical and physical characteristics of the Shroud also bear out the AMA, says Baldacchini. "I have gone as far as the limits of present scientific knowledge but I have sought to remain within the laws of physics as we know them today - especially the conservation of energy, and the non-conservation of certain fundamental parameters in the elementary sub-atomic processes that are the material bases for the existence of the universe".


    Baldacchini's paper is rather remarkable because the first part of it is dedicated to a very informative survey of all the world's religions, then proceeds to the beliefs of Christianity to lay the groundwork for the Resurrection and how the Shroud provides direct evidence that a body dematerialized from it. He then proceeds to a technical-mathematical proof of his matter-antimatter annihilation hypothesis - and his simple mathematical derivations make immediate sense even to someone like me who who only did a semester's work of nuclear physics in college (whose prerequisite, however, was four semesters of calculus and analytical geometry) under a deeply Catholic professor who was a brilliant exponent of quantum mechanics and to whom I will always be grateful for kindling my lifelong interest in theoretical physics. As someone who had the benefit of a wide-ranging curriculum in both physical and natural sciences, I can say that outside of contemplating the Eucharist or the sheer wonder of Creation around me, I was never more in awe and amazement of God and his powers than when studying the sciences!
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 06/07/2012 02:58]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.189
    Post: 7.687
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 06:53



    The new CDF Prefect:
    'Our task is to announce
    the goodness of God'

    Interview with Mons. Mueller
    Translated from the German service of

    July 4, 2012

    Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller began his work this week as the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In this interview with Mario Galgano, he speaks about his task and its challenges.

    How do you feel about your new occupation at the Vatican and what are your expectations?
    I feel like a schoolboy in his first class. There is much that is new to me. I am, of course, familiar with the work it does because I have been a CDF member for five years now and have been attending its monthly meetings which deals with specific topics. But it is still a great changeover - from being a local bishop to being one in the Roman Curia.

    What would you most like to emphasize? What would you most like to bring to this job?
    Our Congregation and the rest of the Roman Curia are there to help the Holy Father in his teaching and pastoral work. The most important in the Church is faith that was given to us through God's offering of Jesus Christ for the salvation of all men. So it is our task to proclaim the goodness and the friendship of God.

    Therefore, it is also important that one tries to overcome his prejudices and stereotypes when one becomes part of the Curia. We are all brothers and sisters who work here and who must strive, in the service of the universal Church, to contribute what we can to do good for the whole Church. That is most especially necessary these days.

    On the one hand, we live in a world in which man is considered from the secular standpoint. We must try to overcome that in a positive way. Man exists to know God and to love him. From this love for God he must do something positive for society and for himself, considering that he is an image of God and has received his Word.

    Therefore one lives within his family or his work circle but also in the wider world in which we move - the economy, politics, culture. These are all important sectors in which we can bring to bear what is positive, edifying and constructive about Christianity, and to make it central.

    And what about dealing with critics of the Church?
    That we can do only by doing our best to be fully attentive to man's search for God and the truth. God cannot be just a side topic. If we orient ourselves to God, to Jesus Christ, then we can even resolve many tensions within the Church. And misunderstanding.

    The unity of the Church of God should not be distorted in ideological and factional ways, whether from the left or from the right, which together work to damage the Church. Unfortunately, such factions have much more resonance in the media than the millions on millions of the faithful who follow the way of Jesus and who do a lot of good to build up the Church.

    How can you reinforce this striving for the Positive in the Church?
    The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is not the successor of the Inquisition, as it is often described in media coverage which remains rather reactionary and conservative in that many newsmen don't seem to bother to acquaint themselves with what is current. Moreover, the Inquisition was tasked in 1542 with defending the Church from heresies and doctrinal errors.

    After the Second Vatican Council, the CDF was established with the task of promoting and defending the Catholic faith. Faith is in itself a salvation experience. It is about the salvation of men and of all mankind. The Holy Father has decreed a Year of Faith which will begin with the 50th anniversary of Vatican II and the next Assembly of the Bishops' Synod.

    The CDF has proposed various ways in which knowledge of the faith can be increased and made deeper in the world today. Many Catholics unfortunately have little knowledge about the content of the faith, and some may even resent the Church on the basis of false teachings.

    Against these falsehoods, the faithful must learn to believe the good that God has done for us, and we must build on this. Bishops are after all those who exercise this teaching function as mandated by Christ.

    As CDF Prefect, you also have other specific functions, among which is President of the Ecclesia Dei Pontifical Commission, which is involved in the negotiations with the FSSPX. What do you expect from this dialog and what would you most like to bring to it?
    The goal is always the unity of the Church and the communion of the faithful with the Church. One can be Catholic only when one recognizes the faith of the Church fully. The Magisterium is part of the faith, and the teaching of Vatican II is an important part of that Magisterium.

    Therefore it is important to overcome even the internal opposition that some marginal elements have, and that they should be open and trust in Benedict XVI and all those who work with him. It is not about forcing anyone or laying conditions, but about recognizing the fullness of God's Revelation whose true interpretation has been entrusted to the Church and her Magisterium.

    That is why I call on everyone who has 'difficulties' with the Magisterium to be trustful and to think about the unity of the Church as well as the truth of the faith, which are two sides of the same coin.

    You are German like the Pope. Does that have any special significance for your new position?
    To be German is not bad! It is a great European culture, among many others. Nor do we have a German national church, nor is this assignment, as some have said, another 'win' for Germany. This is not a football game in which one cheers when someone in the team makes a goal. We are all God's family. It is significant that Pentecost marked the beginning of the Church, when many cultures and languages came together, and there was a feeling of being bound by brotherhood.

    Of course, the Holy Father and I both have German as our mother tongue. And we share German culture, especially the culture of the German university and its theological culture, as well as the fact that Germany is divided by religion. German theologians therefore always have had something to do with evangelical Christianity and must be ecumenically oriented.

    But ecumenism does not in any way mean that one must give up what one believes, but that we must make our own Catholic belief so understandable that it would be understood in a positive way by the other side. We can very well represent our faith spiritually as well as intellectually without offending others.

    And so we hope that the ecumenical process continues. and that God will grant us the grace so that all the Christian churches may once again be one visibly, when we can altogether praise God, profess the same faith, and receive the Sacraments together.

    You have been Bishop of Regensburg. What do you wish for the faithful of what is now your former diocese?
    'Former' only in quotation marks. I am now the emeritus Bishop, and Regensburg is my home diocese. I have met many of the faithful in my pastoral and teaching work, many of them I know personally very well. I have also shared with them many life experiences, some of them difficult. In this sense, I will always feel I am their pastor - their shepherd - and I wish each of them the experience of God's love in their lives. Above all, that they may overcome tensions that are always present in order to feel their belonging to the one family of God, which one is led to when one has a good family background himself. Not just one's personal family, but the larger families of the community, parishes, dioceses, and the universal Church. Then life is a joy, being children of God.

    Do you have any special wish you might want to express?
    I/d like to publicly thank the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, for the great trust that he has shown in me. It is a participation in his mission and in his task to care for the entire Church. I know that we humans have only so much strength. And so I ask not just the Holy Father, but also all fellow Christians in Rome and in the whole world, to pray so that together we can all work in a brotherly spirit for the Church of the 21st century, and that we can carry out, above all, the great task of New Evangelization especially in our European continent, but never lose sight of the universal Church.


    Mueller gave a similar interview to KNA, the German Catholic news agency, which asked him what he thought of vatileaks:
    Müller: I don't know very much concretely about this. We must see what the investigations show. I think it's important that we must not overlook the good service of the hundreds and hundreds who work in the Curia. They have been unjustly lumped together with the actions of some individuals, and the impression is given that everything at the Vatican is down and out. That kind of talk cannot go on.

    And he spoke about what he thinks the CDF should occupy itself with in the immediate future.
    The CDF has the task to support the Pope in his Magisterium. We have to orient ourselves towards the strong points of his preaching. During his last German visit, he placed the question of God very much in the center. He spoke about the 'de-mondization' (Entweltlichung) of the Church, and this does not concern Germany alone. It has to do with the correct understanding of the Church's essence and mission. We must find the right balance between separation from the world and adapting to it, in order to truly serve the world in the name of Jesus Christ. Most especially, we must work to combat a widespread fatigue regarding the faith. And that is a task for the Year of Faith and its commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Vatican-II and the 20th anniversary of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 16:11]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.190
    Post: 7.688
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 15:08


    Thursday, July 5, 13th Week in Ordinary Time

    Second from right, a Barnabite icon showing Zaccaria and St. Paul, his inspiration. Statue, Founders Gallery, St. Peter's.
    ST. ANTONIO MARIA ZACCARIA (Italy, 1502-1539)
    Priest, Founder of the Clerics Regular of St. Paul (Barnabites)
    Born in Cremona, the future saint was raised a by a pious mother who had been widowed early, and was a medical doctor by age 22. He became attracted to the religious apostolate while working among the poor. He renounced his inheritance rights, became a catechist and was ordained a priest at age 26. Assigned to Milan, he laid the foundations for three orders - one for men (the Barnabites), a second for women (Daughters of St. Paul), and a third one for married couples. The aim was to reform the Church among its priests, religious and lay faithful. Society was decadent and so was the Church, leading Martin Luther to launch the Reformation. Zaccaria became a passionate preacher of reform, doing public penance to set an example. He also encouraged daily Communion and Adoration of the Eucharist, as well as lay apostolate. As a reformer, he drew a lot of opposition but he persevered. His community was investigated twice but was exonerated both times. He became seriously ill while on a mission in 1539 and he was brought home to his mother. He died shortly after. He was only 36.
    Readings for today's Mass:
    www.usccb.org/bible/readings/070512.cfm



    No events announced for the Holy Father today. He is officially on vacation till the end of July.

    As it does this time of year, the Vatican released its financial statements for 2011, which showed
    a deficit of about 15 million (euro? US$?) for the Holy See and a surplus of about 22 million for the
    Governatorate, which is financed autonomously, mostly from the income of the Vatican Museums
    (it continues its record earnings, from 82.4 million in 2010 to 91.3 million in 2011).



    - Finally today, four days after the fact, the English service of Vatican Radio has a report on Yad Vashem's modification
    to the offensive caption for Pius XII in its Holocaust photo gallery.

    - It's amazing how many Italian reporters, commentators, even editorial writers, have reported the 'adoption' yesterday by the Council of Europe of the second Moneyval on-site evaluation of the Holy See's financial operations as 'approval' of the Holy See's request to be included in Europe's financial 'white list' even if we won't know what the report says for another month. Of course, the evaluation seems likely to be favorable, thank God, according to the more detailed version of the leaked report (earlier versions only cited the supposedly unfavorable points), but it's not the final word. Further evaluation will follow depending on whatever criticisms the report has. Fr. Federico Lombardi said it correctly in a press briefing today:
    [

    ]"It seems we are on the right path. We began a journey, and this is a significant stage," Fr. Lombardi said, but he declined to comment on what the evaluation itself states, underscoring once more that the Council of Europe "does not desire the dissemination of its contents or any information about it before the report is officially published" one month from now.


    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 19:33]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.191
    Post: 7.689
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 15:22



    In 2011, Holy See had a 15-million euro deficit,
    Governatorate had a 22-million euro surplus


    Correct version from

    July 5, 2012

    The Council of Cardinals for the Study of the Organisational and Economic Problems of the Holy See met in the Vatican on Tuesday 3 July and Wednesday 4 July, under the presidency of Cardinal Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone S.D.B.
    Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, president of the Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See, presented the consolidated financial statements of the Holy See for 2011, then those of the Governorate of Vatican City State.

    The consolidated financial statements of the Holy See for 2011 closed with a deficit of EUR 14,890,034. The most significant items of expenditure were those relative to personnel (who as of 31 December 2011 numbered 2,832) and to the communications media considered as a whole. The result was affected by the negative trend of global financial markets, which made it impossible to achieve the goals laid down in the budget.

    The administration of the Governorate is autonomous, and independent of contributions from the Holy See. Through its various offices, it supervises requirements related to the administration of the State. The consolidated financial statements for 2011 closed with a surplus of EUR 21,843,851. As of 31 December 2011, the Governorate employed a staff of 1,887.

    A particularly significant contribution to the result came from the Vatican Museums, which produced a revenue that passed from EUR 82,400,000 in 2010 to EUR 91,300.000, for a total of more than five million visitors. According to specialised rankings, these figures place the Vatican Museums among the most prestigious and important such institutions in the world.

    Peter's Pence - i.e., donations made by the faithful to support the Holy Father's charity - rose from USD 67,704,416.41 in 2010 to USD 69,711,722.76.

    Contributions made pursuant to canon 1271 of the Code of Canon Law - i.e., the economic support offered by ecclesiastical circumscriptions throughout the world to maintain the service the Roman Curia offers the universal Church - rose from USD 27,362,258.40 in 2010 to USD 32,128,675.91.

    Further contributions to the Holy See made by institutes of consecrated life, societies of apostolic life and foundations rose from USD 747,596.09 in 2010 to USD 1,194,217.78. Thus the overall increase with respect to 2010 was of 7.54 per cent.

    As it does every year, the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR) offered the Holy Father a significant sum to support his apostolic and charitable ministry. The amount involved for the financial year 2011 was EUR 49,000,000.

    During the meeting, according to a communique made public today, "the cardinals present made numerous comments in which they made clear their appreciation at the completeness and transparency of the information they had been given.

    Recognition was expressed for the commitment to the ongoing improvement of the administration of the goods and resources of the Holy See, and a call was made for prudence and limiting costs, though while maintaining jobs.

    Unanimous pleasure was declared at the generous support of the faithful and of ecclesiastical institutions, even more praiseworthy given the persistent economic crisis.

    The members of the Council also expressed their profound gratitude at the support the faithful give, often anonymously, to the universal ministry of the Holy Father, and exhorted them to continue this good work.

    Finally, under the terms of article 25 (2) of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor bonus, Paolo Cipriani, director of the IOR, outlined the economic position of the institution he directs. This was followed by a debate during which the members of the Council were provided with the necessary clarifications"..



    P.S. I am sorry for an apparent confusion: The Vatican statement, in both the original Italian and the English translation, does not use currency units in the first part of the report, referring to the 2011 deficit and surplus, respectively, of the Holy See and the Vatican Governatorate, and again for the figure of IOR's 2011 contribution to the Holy Father's charities. For everything else, it uses USD (the US $). For purposes of the headline, I earlier used euros to express the numbers, but now I must assume the figures are also in USD... I know this is not part of Greg Burke's work, but can someone at the Press Office not spot these discrepancies? Don't they have proofreaders for this?

    P.P.S. This is so confusing. The VATICAN BULLETIN is supposed to be 'the' primary source for anything official from the Vatican, but if it can make the unpardonable mistake it made earlier today, July 5, http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/29453.php?index=29453&po_date=05.07.2012&lang=it
    in publishing the Italian and English texts of the statement on Vatican finances without using currency units for part of the report, will I have to check out all the other Vatican outlets from now on to make sure they have it right? Indeed, checking out the report as it appears in tomorrow's issue of the OR, the figures without currency units in the original bulletins now have the euro sign before them; and the English story that is on news.va, has EUR before the same figures. Using two currency units in the same report is bad enough, to begin with - consistency is supposed to be a watchword in the Church, not just about the faith - but omitting the currency sign on some figures is just absolutely sloppy inattentive work. And what is the rationale anyway for switching from EUR to USD and then back to EUR again in discussing one set of financial statements? I have now replaced the bulletin posted earlier with the English bulletin as it is published in news.va - and gone back to my original headline in euros!

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 09/07/2012 16:56]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.192
    Post: 7.690
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 16:27


    China rejects Vatican protest note and
    will proceed with bishop's ordination tomorrow

    by Gerard O'Connell


    ROME, July 5- The Vatican and Beijing are again in conflict over the planned ordination of a bishop without the Pope’s approval, in Harbin city, n northeastern China, on July 6.

    The Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples (CEP) issued a stern warning to the Chinese authorities on July 3 against going ahead with the ordination of Father Joseph Yue Fushen on July 6.

    The CEP note - issued in Chinese and Italian by Fides news agency- said the candidate had been informed that he does not have the Pope’s approval, and announced that he would incur automatic excommunication, in accordance with Church Law, if so ordained, and would have no authority to govern the Catholic community in Harbin, and would not be given recognition by Rome. Moreover, it said all those bishops who ordain him would likewise incur severe sanctions.

    Furthermore, the CEP stated that the ordination “has been planned in a unilateral way, and would produce divisions, wounds and tensions in the Catholic Community in China”.

    It revealed that the Holy See had informed the Chinese authorities that Father Yue did not have Pope Benedict’s approval. It said such an illicit ordination is not wanted by the Catholic community in Harbin, and would damage Church unity in mainland China.

    It reminded the Chinese authorities that the nomination of bishops “is not a political question, it is a religious one”, and told them that by going ahead with the illicit ordination at Harbin China they would “contradict” efforts at dialogue with the Holy See.

    Less than 24 hours later, on July 4, the Chinese authorities responded sharply with a statement from the State Administration for Religious Affairs (SARA) in Beijing, that dismissed the Vatican’s warning as “extremely outrageous and shocking.”

    SARA charged that any such accusation and interference to normal religious activities in the mainland manifests a restriction of freedom and intolerance and said all this “is detrimental to the healthy development of the Catholic Church in China and harmful to the universal Church.”

    It went onto express the hope “that the Vatican can assess the situation rationally and calmly, respect the wishes of Chinese Catholics and clergy and not threaten [them] with so-called excommunication.”

    It made clear, however, that in the absence of any formal agreement between Beijing and the Vatican, self-election and self-ordination of bishops would continue in mainland China.

    UCA News, the main Catholic news agency in Asia, quoted a Hong Kong-based Church observer as saying that China has taken a firmly political approach to the ordination of bishops, contrary to the directives of the Holy See. [DUH!]

    “Beijing has made clear that the religious ordination of Catholic bishops in China, whether licit or illicit, is not a religious act but a political one in which the government is authorized either to change Church doctrine or ignore it,” the unnamed observer stated.

    “This is destroying the Catholic Church to create something new” and moreover – the observer added - “Such an act violates the Chinese constitution (How exactly? And what does it matter? The Chinese government can always interpret anything their Constitution says as they want to - the Vatican cannot sue them anywhere for being unconstitutional!} and the unity of Catholic believers since it is very clear that bishops, clergy and laypeople want to be united with the Universal Church.”

    Earlier that same day, Liu Yuanlong, a Beijing-based vice-chairperson of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA), confirmed that the ordination of Father Yue would take place on July 6. He said Bishop John Fang Xinyao of Linyi, the chairperson of the CCPA, a bishop recognized by the Holy See, would preside at the ordination in Harbin city.

    Other sources told Vatican Insider that Beijing is trying to get as many as six or more bishops to participate in the ordination ceremony to make clear that it is China not the Holy See that controls the Catholic bishops in the mainland.

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 16:41]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.193
    Post: 7.691
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 17:52


    800 book covers for the Pope -
    who continues to be
    the 'core business' for LEV

    Interview with Fr. Giuseppe Costa
    by Silvia Guidi
    Translated from the 7/5/12 issue of


    "The horizon for publishing is changing and becoming more variegated - besides the traditional book, we now have electronic books. Technology now offers a vast spectrum of possibilities that we at LEV can and should exploit," says Fr. Giuseppe Costa , who was recently reconfirmed by the Pope for another five years as the director of the Libreria Editrice Vaticana (LEV), the Vatican publishing house.

    Fr. Costa referred to the great success of LEV's first 'audiobook' - Benedict XVI's JESUS OF NAZARETH read by Ugo Pagliai [a noted Italian character actor who made his name in popular TV series in the 1970s and who now dedicates himself entirely to acting in theater]. He said audiobooks "enable the reader to be a listener, which lends itself better to reflection".

    Meanwhile, on paper, LEV is preparing to issue an enchiridion (handbook) on the New Evangelization, prepared by the Council in charge of this mission; a new 'economical' edition of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, with a preface by Mons. Rino Fisichella, president of the Council for New Evangelization; and a book which will feature 800 covers of all the books by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI as published in multiple languages.

    Fr. Costa said this book shows at a glance, without requiring any annotations, the universality of the Pope's words and his capacity to generate attention. [It should, of course, come with an index that will constitute, for the general public, a comprehensive (if incomplete) bibliography for Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI and a useful reference. As far as I can tell, this has been done so far only by the Ratzinger Schuelerkreis Foundation, in a 324-page volume entitled DAS WERK and first published in 2009 that only covers his writings before he became Pope - I expect they will update it with the books that have been published since he became Pope; and recently, according to an item published by Beatrice on her site, by French author and scholar Hervé Coutau-Bégarie in a book called RATZINGERIANA, which he finished just a few days before he died earlier this year. It's probably safe to say that the Holy Father is the only living author about whom entire books are now being published just to list his works and all their various editions.

    In fact, he says, "the gift of the Pope's writings" continues to be LEV's 'core business', to use a publishing term.

    Catholic has always meant universal, Fr. Costa points out, and the old concept of the Biblia pauperum (Bible for the poor) of images can still be, in the 21st century, an instrument accessible even to 'digital natives'.

    That is the orientation for the illustrated e-books on Benedict XVI's Wednesday catechetical cycles. "It's a series of 13 volumes produced in collaboration with Apple," says Fr. Costa.

    Sandro Chierici, one of the editors of the series, adds: "A key element is beauty: Each catechesis is illustrated with a series of works of art that act like a discreet annotation to the words of the Pope, presenting the images suggested by his words."

    The Pope's catecheses have been narrating the history of salvation through a polyphony of voices through the centuries all remaining faithful to the unity of the faith transmitted by Tradition.

    "The challenge of presenting visual support to the Pope's texts has been a continuous discovery of this consistent correspondence," said Chierici.

    E-books have the advantage of maximum usability. The format of fixed pages allows it to be like the paper book, but it also allows the reader to enlarge the text and the illustrations. In the case of images, the reader can more easily see hidden or subtle features and enjoy all the iconographic wealth present in paintings, sculptures, engravings and miniatures. Moreover, search functions facilitate consulting any part of the book.

    "LEV publishes and distributes texts that arise from the life of the Church, from Synodal documents to resources intended to introduce and gain deeper understanding the Pope's Magisterium," Fr. Costa said.

    "At the same time, every commentary on Scriptures or the Magisterium - whether it is on wall frescoes in a church or on the screen of an I-pad - should reveal that beauty which, as Hans Urs von Balthasar said, 'we no longer dare to believe] or have ignored in order to free ourselves of our beliefs with a light heart."

    Fr. Costa adds, "Of those who no longer dare to believe, one might say that, secretly or openly, they are no longer able to pray, and probably, unable to love".





    About DAS WERK - I've just found out by Googling it that it is now available online in PDF
    ivv7srv15.uni-muenster.de/mnkg/pfnuer/Das-Werk.pdf
    Of course, the entries are primarily in German, but in addition to citing the book title, it also provides the Table of Contents for each book.


    And about RATZINGERIANA, here's a translation from the blurb by the publisher, L'Homme Nouveau:

    Joseph Ratzinger is the first among modern theologians to become first in the Church. He is not just the 265th Pope, but he is also a great thinker, whose published reflections are impressive as much by their breadth as by the genres he addresses. More than half of his work (around 250 titles) have been translated to French.

    But it is not so easy to find what one may need: In 50 years, many books have been translated and published more than once, with differing results, by various publishing houses, often under different titles.

    This exhaustive guide allows one to find his way through this luxuriant jungle [of the French editions alone]. Written in the form of an annotated bibliography, it constitutes a veritable introduction to a life work whose richness one cannot cease discovering.

    Hervé Coutau-Bégarie (1956-2012) finished this book just a few days before he died. A great researcher and university professor, author of more than 20 reference books and passionate erudite, he was for a long time an attentive reader of everything that the future Benedict XVI has written.


    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/07/2012 23:11]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.194
    Post: 7.692
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 05/07/2012 21:16



    Müller moves to Rome:
    We wish him well in
    waging the 'good fight'

    Translated from

    07/03/2012

    When Benedict XVI preached his great homily on the last Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, he had already long decided that his 'young' friend, the Bishop of Regensburg, Gerhard Ludwig Müller, would be the new Prefect of the Faith.

    At the end of that homily, the Pope addressed directly the metropolitan archbishops who had just received the pallium from him,
    inviting them to act together as "cooperators of the truth, which as we know is one and 'symphonic', and requires from each of us and from our communities a constant commitment to conversion to the one Lord in the grace of the one Spirit."

    To make the that 'one and symphonic' truth shine before the world (and before each human heart) is a very special mission of the Successor of Peter, but it requires having alongside a man of great theological knowledge, proven virtue, broad vision, courage and broad shoulders. A man of correct faith rooted in Tradition, but also a man who knows our time.

    Almost at the very start of his Pontificate, Karol Wojtyla found these characteristics in the then Archbishop of Munich-Freising, who was in his early 50s. It was not easy but in 1982 he finally managed to draw Joseph Ratzinger from his beloved Bavaria to isntall him next to Peter's Chair. The rest is well-known.

    Shortly after being elected, Benedict XVI called on the American bishop William Levada to carry out this function. A descendant of Portuguese immigrant and Archbishop of a city as paradoxical as San Francisco, in which he had as many successes as frustrations, Levada promptly answered the new Pope's summons.

    He has been loyal, rigorous and discreet, a man in whom the Pope had full confidence even if he may not have been as brilliant as some of his predecessors. [Not as brilliant as Joseph Ratzinger, of course, but I think that summary reservation is not fair. Before Cardinal Ratzinger, who was truly 'brilliant' at the CDF? It also under-estimates Levada's considerable credentials.]

    His last great service was the Roman intervention with the largest association of women religious superiors in North America. An old dossier pursued actively in the past four years, which Levada carried to completion in its investigative phase, to leave the path open for his successor. It must be said that Levada had long made known to the Pope that he wished to retire as soon as he turned 75 (in fact, he stayed for another 16 months after that).

    Benedict XVI would have decided on his successor after studying the issue, consulting with others, and praying over his decision. It was probably not easy. First, because of the magnitude of the job, which no one knows better than he. Being CDF Prefect does not simply mean putting errant theologians in their place. The job requires someone who loves order as much as he loves life.

    On the eve of the Year of Faith, the Pope has no illusions. The fight is no longer about defending the last battlements of the fortress, but to generate renewed faith, and that requires someone with uncommon gifts.

    On the other hand, it is a very sensitive time within the Vatican, and the Pope would be seeking to complete a team that serves with total dedication and without reservations towards the mission of the Church and the Pope, and time presses. Obviously, the new Prefect will be made a cardinal as soon as possible.

    But there was another difficult factor in his decision: By bringing Mons. Müller to Rome, he would lose an important piece on the difficult chessboard of the Church on Germany. [No, he could always name someone in the Ratzingerian 'mold' of bishops to take over in Regensburg.]

    Now, Müller is Prefect of the CDF. He is 64 and had been Bishop of Regensburg since 2002, where his pastoral actions have not been unnoticed. He made it clear to some lay organizations who claimed to 'control' the diocese that he was the one legitimate pastor, the bishop consecrated as a successor to the Apostles.

    Nor did he spare the major media outlets in Germany whenever they attacked the Church and especially the Pope; nor did he mince words about the politicians who, in Germany, are so used to speaking out like pseudo-theologians.

    Müller was a bete noire for the savage dissenters of progressivist ideology. But he is also mistrusted by the traditionalist world who think he is too 'open' and point to his long friendship with the Peruvian Gustavo Gutierrez, one of the earliest leaders of liberation theology in Latin America. Apparently, Benedict XVI does not find that friendship frightening!

    To those who have any reservations, let us just point out that Benedict XVI chose Müller to be in charge of publishing his Complete Writings as Joseph Ratzinger. He would not have given such a responsibility to someone dubious in the very matter of Joseph Ratzinger's expertise.

    It may be that Müller, like his mentor, is not easy to classify, and cannot be described according to simplistic categories. He is well known in Madrid, where he has many friends. For years, he was a guest professor at the Faculty of Theology at San Damaso, and he knows Spanish well enough to preach without a prepared text. He knows our history and our spiritual fiber quite well, strengths as well as weaknesses, in the same way that he has a special sensitivity to the entire Spanish-speaking world.

    He certainly does not lack for good credentials. But let us recall more words from the Pope's June 29 homily when he referred to the 'good fight' that St. Paul waged: "This was certainly not the battle of a military commander but that of a herald of the Word of God, faithful to Christ and to his Church, to which he gave himself completely".

    It is this 'good fight' that we wish for Mons. Müller in his new Roman appointment.

  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.195
    Post: 7.693
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 06/07/2012 02:42



    'The God particle demonstrates
    the wonder of creation'

    by Alessandro Speciale
    Translated from the Italian service of

    July 5, 2012

    VATICAN CITY - Mons. Marcello Sanchez Sorondo, chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, knew as early as last autumn that the existence of the long-elusive but much-hypothesized Higgs boson - the sub-atomic particle which has been nicknamed 'the God particle' - would not take much longer to be proven.

    During a symposium on sub-atomic physics organized by the Academy at the Vatican last November, he said, some physicists from CERN, the European center for nuclear research, had said that their Large Hadron Collider (LHC) - the world's largest and most powerful particle accelerator - had begun to register 'indications' of the mysterious particle whose existence physicists have been seeking to show for half a century.

    The Higgs boson is thought to serve as the glue that holds together all other sub-atomic particles so that they present mass, and are not just individual packets of massless energy.

    "Every time there is a discovery like this, it demonstrates what a wonderful thing creation is," said Mons. anchez Sorondo, commenting to VATICAN INSIDER after CERN made the announcement yesterday that the Higgs boson - or something that had its characteristics - had indeed been captured out of the millions of proton collisions produced in the accelerator to yield smaller sub-atomic particles.

    The fact that the Higgs boson exists, as theorized by physicists in 1964, said Sanchez Sorondo, "proves that the universe has a fundamental structure that must be discovered. But if the boson is there," he adds, "it's because someone put it in place!"

    The Higgs boson had become the Holy Grail of nuclear physics especially after it was nicknamed 'the God particle' in a 1991 book by Nobel Prize physicist Leon Ledermann, who says he wanted to call it 'the goddamn particle' but his publishers insisted that "The God Particle' would make a far better book title.

    Perhaps the nickname is too pretentious, but Fr. Sanchez Sorondo chuckles at the thought that even outspoken Italian atheist and physicist Margherita Hack also refers to the Higgs boson as the 'God particle'.

    In all seriousness, Fr. Sanchez Sorondo sees two positive aspects in CERN's big 'discovery': First of all, "Our knowledge is helping us to discover what is happening in nature... Mathematics serves us but only up to a certain point" [in that logical mathematical derivations can and do predict the existence of sub-atomic particles consistent with the laws of quantum mechanics] but "at some point, the hypothesized particles must be shown to exist in reality".

    Fr. Sanchez Sorondo refers to a current of thought that he calls neo-realism which holds that "there is an effective correspondence between what happens in nature and what the mind can understand". In other words, the human mind is not enclosed in a glass bowl, but there is a real correspondence between the world as created and the world as man is able to think about it.

    "The scientist", he says, "simply discovers laws of nature that are already there - scientists do not think up these laws. Who set those laws to begin with is a theological question. The scientist is limited to saying what he discovers, whereas the believer sees every scientific discovery as the result of God's action".



    Apropos, I would like to cite here what, to me, was one of the most amazing answers Benedict XVI has ever given extemporaneously, in one of these public Q&A that he has made an unprecedented platform for the papal Magisterium that will perhaps remain unique to him. In it, he expressed beautifully what Mons. Sanchez Sorondo cites above about the correspondence of the human mind to the reality of nature. This comes from the Pope's Q&A with the diocesan youth of Rome on April 6, 2006. The question was from a 17-year-old student of a science high school.

    I am asking you to help us understand better how Biblical revelation and scientific theories can converge in the search for truth. Often we are led to believe that science and faith are enemies; that science and technology are one and the same; that mathematical logic has discovered everything; that the world is a product of chance, and that if mathematics has not discovered God, the theorem 'God is because he is God', simply does not exist. In short, especially when we are “studying” (for school), it is not always easy to attribute everything to a divine plan inscribed in nature and in the story of man. So, at times, faith wavers or is reduced to a simple act of sentiment. I, too, Holy Father, like all young people, am hungry for Truth, but what can I do to harmonize science and faith?
    The great Galileo said that God wrote the book of nature in the language of mathematics. He was convinced that God had given us two books: that of Sacred Scripture and that of nature. And that the language of nature - he was convinced of this – was mathematics which is therefore a language of God, of the Creator.

    Now let us reflect on what mathematics is: of itself, it is an abstract system, an invention of the human mind, and as such, it does not exist as pure essence. It is always realized approximatively, but as an intellectual system, it is an invention of genius by the human mind. The surprising thing is that this invention of our mind is truly the key to understanding nature, that nature is really structured mathematically, and that our mathematics, invented by the human spirit, is really the instrument with which we can work with nature, place it at our service, make it an instrument through technology.

    It seems to me almost incredible that an invention of the human intellect and the structure of the universe should coincide, that the mathematics invented by us truly gives us access to the nature of the universe and makes this nature useful to us. And so the intellectual structure of the human subject and the objective structure of reality coincide: subjective reason and reason objectified in nature are identical.

    I think that this coincidence between how we think and how nature came to be and how it behaves is a great enigma and challenge, because we see that in the end, there is “one” reason (primary cause) that connects both. Our own reasoning could not have discovered the other if there had not been a reason common to both.

    In this sense, it seems to me that mathematics – in which God cannot appear as such – shows us the intelligent structure of the universe. Now, we even have theories of chaos, but they are limited, because if chaos had the upper hand, then all technology would be impossible. Technology is reliable only because our mathematics is reliable. Our science, which finally makes it possible for us to work with the energies of nature, assumes that matter has a reliable and intelligent structure.

    So we see that there is a subjective rationality as well as a rationality objectified in matter which coincide.

    Of course, no one can now prove – as one does through experiment or technical readings – that both systems of reason really originated from one single “intelligence”, but it seems to me that this single intelligence behind the two systems of reason we have is truly manifest in our world. And that the more we are able to instrumentalize the world with our intelligence, the more the design of creation becomes apparent.

    At the end, to come to the definitive question, I would say: Either there is a God, or there is none. Only two options exist. One either recognizes the priority of reason, of the creative Reason that is at the origin of everything and is the principle of everything – the priority of reason is also the priority of freedom; or one advocates the priority of the irrational, in which everything that works on earth and in our lives would simply be occasional, marginal, an irrational product, in which case reason would be the product of irrationality!

    Ultimately one cannot “prove” one or the other, but the great option of Christianity is to choose rationality and the priority of reason. This seems to me the optimal option which shows us how behind everything there is a great Intelligence, to whom we can entrust ourselves.

    However, the true problem against faith today, it seems to me, is evil in this world. How is it compatible with the rationality of the Creator? It is here we really need the God who was made flesh and who shows us that he is not only mathematical reason, but that he, the original Reason, is also Love. If we look at the major options, the Christian option even today is the most rational and the most human. Because of this, we can elaborate with confidence a philosophy, a vision of the world, that is based on this priority of reason, on our faith that the creative Reason is love, and that this love is God.

    One imagines that is the way he spoke to students in his university lectures, and no wonder they called him Goldmund. His answer was a perfect essay on the essence of science, the essence of nature and how they both can only lead to God. I remember going into literal rapture after I first saw the transcript, and I still do everytime I look back at this answer.
    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 06/07/2012 16:13]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.196
    Post: 7.694
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 06/07/2012 11:42


    Friday, July 6, 13th Week in Ordinary Time

    ST. MARIA GORETTI (Italy, 1890-1902), Virgin and Martyr
    Daughter of a poor farming family near Ancona, central eastern Italy, Maria never learned to read and write. The family migrated to a community near Rome. She was not yet 12 and had only recently made her First Communion when she was assaulted by an 18-year-old neighbor, Alessandro Serinelli, who stabbed her several times when she defended her virginity, telling him it was a sin and Jesus forbade sin. She died from her wounds the following day, but before dying, she received Extreme Unction and forgave her assailant. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Years later, he had a vision of Maria in heaven, which led him to repent. When he was released after 27 years, he begged forgiveness from Maria's family and became devoted to her memory. Many miracles were attributed to Maria after her death. When she was beatified in 1947, her 82-year-old mother and three surviving siblings joined Pius XII on the loggia of St. Peter's. Her canonization in 1950 brought half a million people to Rome, and for the first time, a canonization Mass was celebrated in St. Peter's Square. Pius XII held her out to the young people of the world as an example. Among the pilgrims was Serenelli, who was 66. (He had became a Capuchin lay brother, working as a gardener until he died at age 70). The main shrine to Maria Goretti is in Nettuno, 60 kms south of Rome.
    Readings for today's Mass:
    www.usccb.org/bible/readings/070612.cfm



    No bulletin so far from the Vatican for 7/6/12.

  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.197
    Post: 7.695
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 06/07/2012 14:13


    Mutineers on Peter's ship
    Vatileaks broke the pact of loyalty that holds the Roman Curia together.
    The Pope has started consultations for a change in administration.
    [Has he?]
    A letter from the Pope to Cardinal Bertone.


    ROME, July 6, 2012 - The critical point of this Pontificate is not the opposition, often harsh, with which he has been hammered uninterruptedly on various grounds.

    Rather it is the rupture of that pact of loyalty within the Church manifested in the massive leakage of private files from the highest offices in the Vatican. [I disagree with the formulation. It is not so much the rupture of a 'pact' [an oath of office that Curial personnel have to sign] - which is not sacrosanct like the vow of obedience that priests and bishops make - but the very fact of betrayal and disloyalty in itself, whether you are bound by a 'pact' or not, in acts that are not just cowardly but criminal!]

    Papa Ratzinger has never allowed himself to be intimidated by opposition. He does not put up with it; indeed, in some crucial cases, he provokes it willingly. And does not retreat a step even when the reaction is extreme and ferocious beyond expectation.

    The memorable lecture in Regensburg was the first demonstration. Benedict XVI had laid bare the burden of violence present in Islam with a directness that stunned the world and scandalized the kumbaya inter-religious advocates within the Church.

    He called for an enlightened revolution in Islam as Christianity had experienced. Now, years later, the much-hailed spring of freedom that had seemed to flourish in many Arab countries in 2011 appears to have withered would seem to confirm what he saw back in 2005 - where and how the future of Islam would be played out

    The sexual abuses committed against children and minors constituted another area in which Benedict XVI moved against the current - and this even before he became Pope. At the CDF, he moved to introduce exceptional procedures to institute a system for how the Church deals with these cases.

    Because of him, for over a decade now, three out of four such cases have been resolved not through canon law but through the more direct means of extra-judicial decree laid down by higher authority on the offending priest.

    Marcial Maciel, the diabolical founder of the Legionaries of Christ, was sanctioned in that way when he was still universally revered and hailed with hosannahs by his followers, [ordered by Benedict XVI in 2006 to retire to a private life of penance and never to practice the priesthood in public again], though he was spared both canonical and civil trials [because of his age (84 at the time) and terminal illness].

    Benedict XVI placed an entire national church, that of Ireland, in a state of penance and dismissed inept bishops. The fact is that in the world today, there is no government or institution or religion that has done more than Benedict's Church to combat this scandal and protect children from abuses.

    Then there was his revoking the excommunication of the Lefebvrian bishops in the hope of getting the FSSPX back to the flock; his earlier liberalization of the traditional Mass; his decision to welcome traditionalist Anglicans into the Catholic Church en masse - on all these grounds, Benedict XVI has provoked conflicts, many of them still acute, that have caused him an avalanche of criticism. Not just from the left but from the right. As when, in the interview book Light of the World, he appeared to have made a concession to the use of condoms when one spouse is infected with HIV.

    It is a mistake to confuse this Pope's gentleness for submissiveness. Or with non-involvement, if not being aloof, from making decisions of state. Even the tempest over IOR, the Vatican 'bank', began with him - his desire to assure maximum financial transparency for all the institutions of the Vatican.

    There is no government in the world whose decisions are not disputed and opposed before and after policies become law, in public or in private. Benedict XVI obviously wants this give-and-take for the administration of the Church as well. And the internal conflicts evident in the leaked documents are a normal part of the decision-making profile of any institution.

    So it's not what is found in those documents [none of which was inherently scandalous or damaging - a fact hardly ever mentioned in all the furor - despite the negative impressions left about Cardinal Bertone], but the fact that they came out at all, is the real thorn in the flesh for this Pontificate.

    It is a betrayal of the pact of loyalty that holds together an institution, especially the Church, where the inviolability of the 'internal forum', like the secrecy of confession, implies a privacy about internal procedures.

    The mutineers within the system have claimed, anonymously, that they are motivated by the good of the Church. That's always been a recurrent justification in history. In this case, they claim that they hope to regenerate Christianity by their actions. [What a hoot! How do your regenerate Christianity by exposing bureaucratic infighting and failed attempts by the Secretary of State to bite more than he can chew? (He failed, all right? - the Pope vetoed him down!) Not all the kind letters to Bertone can change the fact that Benedict XVI has not always taken his 'counsel' or favored all his schemes. And it is very reassuring that Benedict XVI evidently does not just listen to one side, that his 'full confidence' in his closest collaborators is not blind confidence.]

    But so many of their 'secular' supporters want to see the Church collapse. Not to be regenerated but to be humiliated.

    Internal conflicts in an institution can be regulated. Betrayal much less so. Traitors are an indication that there is no 'government', that the occult 'rebellion' of some of its 'civil servants' has been allowed to rankle, and nothing has been done to neutralize them.

    The Vatican Secretary of State, who since Paul VI, became the lead player in the central government of the Church, is also inevitably the one responsible for this drift towards mutiny and betrayal.

    Benedict XVI is aware of this, and so he has turned to others, besides his 'prime minister', to set things right, beginning with Cardinals Ouellet, Pell, Ruini, Tauran and Tomko.

    The way is open for a change of government in the Vatican Curia.

    This article was written for the issue of L'Espresso which comes out July 6, an issue that was already being printed when the Vatican released the text of a short letter written to Cardinal Bertone by the Pope before leaving for Castel Gandolfo.

    [Magister reproduces the text.]

    The letter of January 15, 2010, cited by the Pope was his response to Cardinal Bertone's letter of resignation submitted when he turned 75 in December 2009. In that letter, the Pope explained why he had named him Secretary of State and why he wanted him to continue in the position:

    I have always admired your sensus fidei, your doctrinal and canonistic preparation and your humanitas, which helped us at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to live in an atmosphere of authentic familiarity, combined with a decisive discipline of work.

    All these qualities led me to decide in the summer of 2006 to name you as my Secretary of State, and these are the reasons for which today and in the future, I do not wish to do without your valuable collaboration.

    In his recent note, the Pope writes that the 'contents' of the 2010 letter "remain unchanged for me".

    Meanwhile, however, the 'qualities' which earned Bertone his position have visibly deteriorated to all, especially in recent days.

    His humanitas was openly in question, for instance, with the unprecedented brutality with which, on May 24, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi was chased out of IOR. [A brutality I have always called un-Christian, and which persists strangely every time Fr. Lombardi makes a reference to Gotti Tedeschi, who must be such a monster in the eyes of the Secretariat of State, that there is a relentless hostility to him, expressed - almost rubbed in every time - in a way for which there is no precedent in living memory. The Vatican of John Paul II closed ranks unequivocally behind Archbishop Marcincus at IOR after the Banco Ambrosiano scandal, than which there could not have been a more truly scandalous case in every sense of the word. Is it because Gotti Tedeschi is a civilian and not a cleric? What might Gotti Tedeschi - devout Opus Dei from all accounts - have done that has earned him this literal anathema from the Secretariat of State?]

    As for 'work discipline', Vatileaks itself gives the lie to that.

    Rather, it is Benedict XVI who is showing what humanitas and discipline mean, in a note that appears to be an affectionate way of easing Cardinal Bertone towards retirement. [This may be Magister's wishful thinking. I'd wait and see what happens in December when Bertone turns 78. If Benedict XVI decides to keep him on then, it doesn't matter what we think now... And I continue to believe that the primary motivation for the July 2 note to Bertone was to try and ensure that the media was not going to spend the next three months - for lack of news during the summer - indulging in the wildest speculations about what's happening next at the Vatican. 'Stay calm, I'm not going to do anything about Bertone any time soon', seems to be the message.]


    Vatican denies article
    claiming a Curial Cardinal
    has a 30-year-old son


    Speaking of Cardinal Bertone, here's a statement from Fr. Lombardi today which is self-explanatory:

    In the issue of the magazine Panorama dated July 11, 2012, an artiole is published bylined Ignacio Ingrao, with the title, "Bertone, the hole*, and a cardinal's son". The Secretariat of State underscores that the statements reported in the article about the supposed existence of a son for a cardinal "heading one of the financial organisms of the Holy See" are evidently false and devoid of any proof.

    About such statements and others that are equally untrue in the article, which is plainly denigratory and going beyond the legitimate limits of the right to report, the Secretariat of State reserves the right to use every possible initiative to protect the rights of the persons concerned.

    *The 'hole' presumably refers to the 'hole' in Vatican leadership.

    Obviously, Ingrao must have worked on the article before the Pope's letter was published. I have not read it yet - but other Italian media reports say it claims the putative son is in his 30s and that the putative father is a 'cardinal very close to Cardinal Bertone'. Ingrao, whose journalistic manners have not always been scrupulous, is obviously piling on Bertone, who is not responsible for any immoral behavior by his friends, even assuming that Ingrao's canard is true. But it is not just Bertone that Ingrao harms, but the Church herself by suggesting that the Pope has recently elevated to cardinal a man who has violated his priestly vows. [Of the four Bertone proteges who became cardinal last February, three were named to head financial agencies and one, President of the Governatorate].

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 06/07/2012 15:03]
  • OFFLINE
    TERESA BENEDETTA
    Post: 25.198
    Post: 7.696
    Registrato il: 28/08/2005
    Registrato il: 20/01/2009
    Administratore
    Utente Master
    00 06/07/2012 16:16



    In the weeks and days leading up to the formal appointment of Mons. Mueller as CDF Prefect, I desisted from posting any of the sniping - lots of it - that cast his theology as questionable. I desisted not just because they involved unpersuasive circular reasoning but for the basic reason that our theologian-Pope would never name anyone as CDF Prefect whom he did not trust with the doctrine of the faith. Now that Mons. Mueller is in place, I am posting this current commentary by William Oddie which sort of sums up the major objections to Mons. Mueller that have been expressed.

    It's just too bad - and rather inexplicable - that the first two interviews published so far with the new CDF Prefect, done by Vatican Radio's German service and by the German Catholic news agency KNA did not bring up the three major controversies about him at all - where he really stands on 1) liberation theology (regardless of his friendship with Gustavo Gutierrez), 2) the Eucharist; and 3) the virginity of Mary. To lay these ghosts to rest, as it were, as he starts his term as CDF Prefect.


    Is the new Prefect of the CDF really
    not a man of ‘secure doctrine’?

    Some in Rome think so, and he does defend liberation theology;
    But he’s also close to the Pope who knows what he's doing

    By William Oddie

    Friday, 6 July 2012

    What are we to make of the appointment of Bishop (now Archbishop) Gerhard Ludwig Müller as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith?

    It looks, at first sight, to be an obvious choice of a tough and orthodox bishop, close to the Holy Father. According to the renowned Vaticanologist Sandro Magister, he will be part of a “small nucleus” of cardinals in whom the pope can have complete confidence, including Cardinal Marc Ouellet, the French Canadian who is Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops and Cardinal Kurt Koch, who is Swiss and is President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. Archbishop Müller is an old friend of the pope, and is presently editing a 16-volume Collected Writings of Joseph Ratzinger.[He's not the editor - he's the publisher, as president of the Institut Papst Benedikt XVI, though the books themselves are published through Herder.]

    So, what’s not to like? Well, he may be an old friend of the Pope; but he’s also an old friend of the most renowned (or notorious) of liberation theologians, Gustavo Gutiérrez. He has written a book with him; and according to John Allen, every year since 1998 has travelled to Peru to “take a course” (What does that mean?) from Gutiérrez.

    In 2008, he accepted an honorary doctorate from the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, which is widely seen as a bastion of the progressive wing of the Peruvian church. On that occasion, he praised Gutiérrez and 'defended his theology'.

    “The theology of Gustavo Gutiérrez, independently of how you look at it, is orthodox because it is orthopractic,” he is on record as saying: “It teaches us the correct way of acting in a Christian fashion since it comes from true faith.”

    This Gutiérrez connection, it appears, among other issues, led to an unsuccessful attempt by Vatican conservatives to prevent the appointment, and you can see why it might.

    Other issues raised by these Vatican conservatives — who sent out e-mails all over the place (don’t you love it? Vatican conspiracy in the digital age) suggesting that Archbishop Müller is not a man of “secure doctrine” — were his views on the perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Eucharist (he has apparently suggested we shouldn’t use the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated elements – so what DO we call them?), and ecumenism (last October, he apparently declared that Protestants are “already part of the Church” founded by Christ.)

    What remains obscure to those of us who haven’t actually read the works in which he proposes these things is what he actually means by them. His defenders are arguing that in every one of these examples of his supposed “insecurity of doctrine” his words have either been taken out of context or are consistent with official teaching.

    I’m sure that must be true; quite simply, I trust the Pope, who knows the difference between an orthodox theologian who is so solid in the faith that he can afford to speculate and a flaky liberal who thinks that speculation isn’t just a permissible intellectual activity within accepted boundaries but is itself the ultimate aim of all intellectual life and that there are no such boundaries.

    So, I am sure that Archbishop, Cardinal-to-be Müller is doctrinally as solid as a rock. All the same, the Prefect of the CDF surely needs to be easily and unambiguously understood by the faithful. These speculative flights could lead to trouble, and I hope he will soon take steps to dispel the uncertainty by explaining himself in simple language.

    Already, for instance, there are signs of trouble from the FSSPX, from the wing of the FSSPX who are already giving Bishop Fellay problems over his attempts to bring the Society back into full communion with the Catholic Church. The issue is Archbishop Müller’s allegedly heterodox views on Our Lady’s perpetual virginity. “It is not acceptable that the leader of the congregation holds a heresy,” said Auxiliary Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta.

    Well, no, absolutely — but does he? The Pope obviously thinks he doesn’t. But the Pope is a real theologian of theologians: what about simple people like me? His hermeneuticalness, Fr Tim Finegan, says he is sitting on the fence over the appointment, over precisely the same issue, though he comes down on the opposite side of the fence from the SSPX over the issue of Our Lady’s perpetual virginity.

    Essentially, he explains, Archbishop Müller has said that “the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary is not so much concerned with specific physiological proprieties in the natural process of birth (such as the birth canal not having been opened, the hymen not being broken, or the absence of birth pangs). He says that it is concerned rather “with the healing and saving influence of the grace of the Saviour on human nature”…

    "The question of Our Lady’s physical integrity was discussed by Tertullian." Fr. Finigan points out. "Writing against the docetists and in favour of Christ’s true humanity he argued against physical integrity and in favour of a normal birth. In summary, Bishop Müller’s theological opinion on the relationship of physical integrity at birth to the doctrine of the virginity of Our Lady… is not heretical, even if most devout Catholics would want to go with the general teaching of the Fathers and St Thomas.”

    All the same, Fr Finegan himself is, he says, “sitting on the fence at the moment”, even after giving various examples of Archbishop Müller’s orthodox toughness, including a recent sermon — much attacked by the We Are Church mob — in which he said that “We should not allow any room for anti-Roman blabber… Any activities directed against the truth of the Faith and the unity of the Church will not be tolerated”.

    Well, I’m not sitting on the fence. I trust the Pope; when I’m a bit perplexed, that’s my default position. All the same, I have my fingers crossed. In the words of the song, “there may be trouble ahead”. [There won't be, or much less of it, if Mons. Mueller makes every effort during the summer news doldrums, when he can have a less distracted audience, to clear up his positions on these controversies.]

    [Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 06/07/2012 16:35]
327