AP's initial wrap-up includes the reaction in Poland but not the Vatian news conference:
Pope John Paul II
to be beatified May 1
By NICOLE WINFIELD
VATICAN CITY, Jan. 14 (AP) - The Pope on Friday signed off on the miracle needed to beatify Pope John Paul II, and set May 1 as the date to honor one of the most beloved pPpes of all times as a model of saintliness for the Church.
Pope Benedict XVI said in a decree that a French nun's recovery from Parkinson's disease was miraculous, the last step needed for beatification. A second miracle is needed for the Polish-born John Paul to be made a saint.
The May 1 ceremony, which Benedict himself will celebrate, is expected to draw hundreds of thousands of pilgrims to Rome -
a major morale boost for a Church reeling from a wave of violence against Christians and fallout from the clerical sex abuse scandal. [What a cheap trick to bring the 'scandal' back to public attention! Even if the media had not made such a big to-do over the 'scandal' for most of 2010, the process for John Paul II would have ended the same way and at this time. His beatification is a 'morale booster' - the betttr word is 'inspiration' - for most Catholics under any circumstances.]
"This is a huge and important cause of joy," Warsaw Archbishop Kazimierz Nycz told reporters at his residence in the Polish capital.
Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, John Paul's longtime secretary and friend, expressed "huge thanks" to Benedict for the decree. "We are happy today," he said.
Benedict put John Paul on the fast track to possible sainthood just weeks after he died in 2005, responding to the chants of "Santo Subito!" or "Sainthood immediately!" that erupted during his funeral.
Benedict waived the typical five-year waiting period before the process could begin, but he insisted that the investigation into John Paul's life be thorough so as to not leave any doubts about his virtues.
John Paul's beatification will nevertheless be the fastest on record, coming just over six years after his death and beating out Mother Teresa's then-record beatification in 2003 by a few days.
The last remaining hurdle in John Paul's case concerned the approval by Vatican-appointed panels of doctors and theologians, cardinals and bishops that the cure of French nun Sister Marie Simon-Pierre was a miracle due to the intercession of the late Pope.
The nun has said she felt reborn when she woke up two months after John Paul died, cured of the disease that had made walking, writing and driving a car nearly impossible. She and her fellow sisters of the Congregation of Little Sisters of Catholic Maternity Wards had prayed to John Paul, who also suffered from Parkinson's.
On Friday, Sister Marie Simon-Pierre said John Paul was and continues to be an inspiration to her because of his defense of the unborn and because they both had Parkinson's.
John Paul "hasn't left me. He won't leave me until the end of my life," she told French Catholic TV station KTO and Italy's state-run RAI television.
Wearing a white habit and wire-rimmed glasses, she appeared in good health and showed no signs of tremors or slurred speech which are common symptoms of Parkinson's.
"John Paul II did everything he could for life, to defend life," she said. "He was very close to the smallest and weakest. How many times did we see him approach a handicapped person, a sick person?"
Last year, there were some questions about whether the nun's original diagnosis was correct. But in a statement Friday, the Congregation for the Causes of Saints said Vatican-appointed doctors had "scrupulously" studied the case and determined that her cure had no scientific explanation.
Once he is beatified, John Paul will be given the title "Blessed" and can be publicly venerated. Many people, especially in Poland, already venerate him privately, but the ceremony will make it official.
Born in Wadowice, Poland, in 1920, Karol Wojtyla was the youngest pope in 125 years and the first non-Italian Pope in 455 years when he was elected Pope in 1978.
He brought a new vitality to the Vatican, and quickly became the most accessible modern Pope, sitting down for meals with factory workers, skiing and wading into crowds to embrace the faithful.
His Polish roots nourished a doctrinal conservatism - opposition to contraception, euthanasia, abortion and women priests - that rankled liberal Catholics in the United States and Western Europe.
But his common touch also made him a crowd-pleasing superstar whose 26-year papacy carried the Roman Catholic Church into Christianity's third millennium and emboldened eastern Europeans to bring down the communist system.
He survived an assassination attempt in St. Peter's Square in 1981 - and then forgave the Turk who had shot him.
He was the most traveled Pope ever, visiting more than 120 nations during the third-longest papacy in history and covering distance equal to nearly 1 1/2 trips to the moon.
After suffering for years from the effects of Parkinson's disease, he died in his Vatican apartment on April 2, 2005, at the age of 84.
While adored by Catholics, John Paul did not escape scrutiny about the clerical abuse scandal which came to light in the final years of his papacy. Many of the thousands of sexual abuse cases that emerged in Europe and beyond last year concerned crimes or cover-ups that occurred under his watch.
Vatican officials have said there was nothing in John Paul's record that called into question his path to beatification.
Carl Anderson, head of the Knights of Columbus, one of the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organizations, noted that John Paul's beatification process is not a "score card on his administration of the Holy See."
Rather, he said, it's a statement about his personal sanctity since beatification is way of holding up Catholics as models for the faithful.
"Pope John Paul's life is precisely such a model because it was lived beautifully and with love, respect and forgiveness for all," Anderson told the AP in an e-mail. "We saw this in the way he reached out to the poor, the neglected, those of other faiths, even the man who shot him. He did all of this despite being so personally affected by events of the bloodiest century in history."
Dziwisz, John Paul's most trusted friend who seemed at times impatient with the slow pace of the process, gave thanks on Friday from Krakow, where he is archbishop.
"We are happy that this process came to an end, that what people asked for - "Santo Subito" - was fulfilled," Dziwisz said. "I express great joy on behalf of the entire diocese of Krakow - and I think I am also authorized to express this on behalf of all of Poland."
Associated Press reporters Vanessa Gera in Warsaw and Angela Doland in Paris contributed to this report.
John Allen was, of course, ready with his commentary as soon as the news was officially announced:
Vatican announces May 1
beatification for John Paul II
by John L Allen Jr
Jan. 14, 2011
Pope Benedict XVI today approved a miracle attributed to Pope John Paul II, clearing the way for the late pontiff’s beatification, the final step before sainthood. The Vatican announced that the beatification ceremony will take place in Rome on Sunday, May 1.
While today’s announcement is expected to be greeted with joy around the Catholic world, critics have raised questions both about the substantive case for declaring the late pope a saint, including his record on the sexual abuse crisis, and the speed with which it’s occurred.
In a statement released this morning, the Vatican insisted that aside from waiving the normal five-year waiting period to begin a sainthood cause, on account of what it described as the “imposing fame for holiness” enjoyed by John Paul II during his life, in every other respect “the common canonical dispositions” for sainthood causes were “integrally observed.”
Organizers expect that the ceremony will attract the largest crowd in Rome since the events surrounding the death of John Paul II and the election of Benedict XVI six years ago, in April 2005.
Formally speaking, beatification entitles a candidate to be referred to as “blessed” but not yet a saint. Traditionally, prayer and devotion to a “blessed” were encouraged only in that person’s local church, but John Paul II’s global appeal means that his beatification will have echoes well beyond his native Poland or the city of Rome.
In the sainthood process, one miracle is required for beatification and another for canonization. (The logic is that the miracles provide proof that the saint is indeed in Heaven and capable of interceding for those who request help in prayer.)
Most of the miracles in sainthood causes are healings, and the Vatican has historically applied three standards to ascertain if a healing qualifies. It must be “complete,” meaning it’s not enough if the person merely feels better or shows some improvement; “instantaneous,” as opposed to a recovery that unfolds over weeks, months, or longer; and it must be “durable,” meaning that the condition does not return. In addition, the healing must be medically and scientifically inexplicable.
The miracle approved today by Benedict XVI concerns a 49-year-old French nun, Sister Marie Simon-Pierre, who was diagnosed with an aggressive form of Parkinson’s disease in 2001 and whose order prayed to John Paul II after his death in 2005 for help.
Reportedly, after writing the late Pope’s name on a piece of paper one night in June 2005, Sister Marie-Simone awoke the next morning cured and was able to resume her work as a maternity nurse.
{The story is that a group of her fellow nuns had decided to pray together to John Paul II for her healing.]
Earlier this year, media reports implied that the French sister had fallen ill again and that at least one physician questioned the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, suggesting it may have been some other nervous disorder.
It would seem that the Vatican resolved those doubts to its satisfaction, however, as the miracle has been approved by both the Vatican’s medical and theological consulters, as well as the cardinals and bishops who make up the Congregation for the Causes of Saints and the Pope himself.
Momentum to declare John Paul a saint began almost at the moment of his death.
In the run-up to the conclave that elected Benedict XVI to the papacy in April 2005, some cardinals signed a petition requesting that the next Pope move immediately to opening a sainthood process for John Paul II. During his funeral Mass, mourners held signs and chanted “Santo Subito!”, meaning “Sainthood Now!”
Shortly after his election, Benedict waived the waiting period but otherwise held that the usual procedure should be followed.
Among Church insiders, it’s taken for granted that John Paul II’s cause will not stall at beatification, but that he will fairly quickly also be canonized and declared a saint.
Given John Paul’s popularity and high public profile, news of his beatification is certain to be a major news event. There are, however, also three persistent strains of criticism likely to resurface in coming days.
First, some Catholic liberals who saw John Paul II as overly conservative have suggested that his cause is being fast-tracked in order to score political points in internal Catholic debates.
This constituency has wondered, for example, why John Paul II is being beatified so quickly, when the late Pope John XXIII, who launched a period of reform in Catholicism by calling the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), has not yet been canonized following his own beatification in 2000.
[It could simply be that no 'canonization miracle' has so far been verified for John XXIII. How can any Catholic imagine that there could be any 'favoritism' employed in the sainthood process at all? Following the critics' reasoning, why have other Popes who were declared Blessed before John XXIIII - some for centuries - not been canonized so far! This quibbling is absurd, unworthy and most un-Christian!]
Second, some traditional Catholics may object to the apparent haste in John Paul’s cause, arguing that it risks cheapening the canonization process if there’s a perception that a particular candidate is being moved forward too hastily.
Perceptions that the usual process has been “short-circuited,” some warn, may suggest that other Church teachings and disciplines can be massaged or set aside. They add that according to Catholic theology, the Church has no power to “make” a saint – it can simply ratify that a particular figure is already in Heaven. By that logic, there’s no rush, since if John Paul is indeed a saint, formal beatification and canonization won’t add anything.
[This is another fallacious argument, of course. Before the canonization process was institutionalized by the Church, saints were 'made' by popular acclamation. Does anyone doubt that John Paul II has such 'popular acclanation'? And all this talk about undue haste is an insult to the integrity of the Congregation for the Causes of Sainthood, which moire than any other - except perhaps the Pope who has to formalize approval of any decision by the Congregation - must surely be very conscious at each step that it cnanot risk having its decisions validly challenged later on.]
Third, some victims of clerical sexual abuse and their advocates believe that John Paul’s record on the crisis is not worthy of sainthood, or at least that beatifying him now risks giving offense to victims who associate the late Pope with a mixed response to the crisis.
Some have argued that the study of John Paul’s life and legacy as part of the sainthood process did not give sufficient weight to his handling of the sexual abuse crisis, such as the case of the late founder of the Legionaries of Christ, Mexican Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, a longtime favorite during John Paul’s papacy who was later disgraced as the Legionaries acknowledged he was guilty of various forms of sexual misconduct.
[What is their basis for saying so? Under the well-defined process for beatification and eventual canonization, any possible objections to the personal holiness of a candidate saint are presented, duly debated and rebutted, first at the dicoesan level (in this case, in Cracow), and then in Rome. Cardinal Levada has said that the CDF was formally asked to make a statement on the late Pope's personal and direct involvement with the sex abuse cases including that of Fr. Maciel, and the CDF certified that he had none. Does anyone believe that Cardinal Levada and the CDF would lie about this or anything else???? The uninformed and severely biased opinion of persons who are hostile to the candidate cannot outweigh the overwehelming and universal testimony of the late Pope's personal holiness - which, in itself, would have precluded him from knowingly 'condoning' sex offenses by priests, including his friend Fr. Maciel.
Yesterday, even before the formal Vatican announcement, the Survivors’ Network of those Abused by Priests issued a statement asserting that the hierarchy is “rubbing more salt into the wounds” of victims with a “hasty drive to confer sainthood on the Pontiff under whose reign most of the widely-documented clergy sex crimes and cover ups took place.”
[Once again, these knee-jerk critics must be reminded that the personal holiness of Karol Wojtyla is not contingent on how well or how badly he administered the Church. As for his attitude to sexual offenses by priests: At the time the scandal first broke out in the United States, he acted quickly to place the responsibility for these abuses under the CDF. Nobody argues that it was a useless or unproductive move! Before the US scandal, the media itself - with a few exceptiosn that were not pursued, such as the initial reports on Fr. Maciel - exercised on interest, much less initiative, in exposing priestly crimes.... Likewise, it is wrong to say that 'most of the abuses' took place during John Paul's Pontificate, as the bulk of the abuses began under Paul VI soon after Vatican-II and the contemproaneous sexual revolution of the 1960s counterculture. Is anyone accusing Paul VI of personal responsibility for the abuses that took place during his pontificate???]
Vatican officials today did not offer any response to substantive criticism of John Paul II, [Were they asked about it specifically at the news conference today? If no one asked, it would have been unseemly for the Vatican officials to volunteer to asnwer a consideration that may be paramount for the victimhood advocates but has already been appropriately addressed and alid to rest by the official steps of the beatification process.] but in past cases when Popes have been moved along the sainthood track, they generally insist that beatifying or canonizing a Pope is not tantamount to endorsing every policy choice of his pontificate. Instead, they say, it’s a declaration that this Pope lived a holy life worthy of emulation, despite whatever failings may have occurred during his lifetime – including his reign as Pope.
The date for the beatification ceremony, May 1, has been observed since 2000 as “Divine Mercy Sunday” by the Catholic church.
[Not the date, May 1, itself - Divine Mercy Sunday is a moveable feast, observed on the first Sunday after Easter.]
The Divine Mercy feast is associated with a 20th century Polish nun, St. Faustina Kowalska, who was a visionary and mystic to whom John Paul II had a strong personal devotion.
Ironically, May 1 is also “May Day,” traditionally associated with the international Socialist movement, which is striking given that the collapse of European Communism is often flagged as John Paul’s central political accomplishment.
In his blog today, Father Z explains patiently to those of his readers who are protesting the 'haste' of this beatification that it went through a prescribed process - the equivalent of a trial to determine guilt or acquittal for an accused - and as long as there is no reason to doubt the validity of the process, the Pope, who must formalize all decisions of the Congregation for Saints, must and will approve their recommendation. Some processes take time, some processes go much faster, if only because in the case of John Paul II, there were masses of material on his life to examine for proof of his 'heroic virtues', not to mention that a potential 'beatification miracle' did not take long to become known - and subsequently verified - after his death.
On the other hand, Damian Thompson's blog is entitled: "Great news, but...." , the 'but' representing the objections of his readers, typified by one who thinks that the speed of this beatification is akin to the Sovereign of England handing out a life peerage 'automatically' to an ex-Prime Minister. This ignores the indisputable fact that the Popes in the past 150 years, at least, were recognized, even in htheir lifetime - as Benedict XVI is now - for their personal holiness. Except for the pall of doubt cast unfortunately by the Black Legend that the Communists manufactured about Pius XII, I do not doubt he would have been at least a Blessed by now!
The shorter note from the Congregation of Saints that was released today summarizes the steps of the process towards the eventual canonization of John Paul II thus far:
Note from the Congregation for the Causes of Sainthood
on the Beatification of the Venerable Servant of God
John Paul II (Karol Wojtyla)
Translated from
Today, January 14, 2011, Benedict XVI, during an audience granted to Cardinal Angelo Amato S.D.B., prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, authorised the dicastery to promulgate the decree of the miracle attributed to the intercession of Venerable Servant of God John Paul II (Karol Wojtyla). This concludes the process which precedes the rite of beatification.
It is well known that, by pontifical dispensation, his cause began before the end of the five-year period which the current norms stipulate must pass following the death of a Servant of God.
This provision was solicited by the great fame for holiness which Pope John Paul II enjoyed during his life, in his death and after his death. In all other ways, the normal canonical dispositions concerning causes of beatification and canonisation were observed in full.
Between June 2005 and April 2007 the principal diocesan investigation was held in Rome, accompanied by secondary investigations in various other dioceses, on his life, virtues, fame of sanctity and miracles.
The juridical validity of these canonical processes was recognised by the Congregation for the Causes of Saints with a decree of 4 May 2007.
In June 2009, having examined the relative 'Positio', nine of the dicastery's theological consultors expressed their positive judgement concerning the heroic nature of the virtues of the Servant of God.
The following November, in keeping with the usual procedure, the 'Positio' was submitted for the judgement of the cardinals and bishops of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, who gave their approval.
On 19 December 2009, Benedict XVI authorised the promulgation of the decree on John Paul II's heroic virtues.
With a view to the beatification of the Venerable Servant of God, the postulator of the cause invited the Congregation for the Causes of Saints to examine the recovery from Parkinson's disease of Sr. Marie Simon Pierre Normand, a religious of the Institut des Petites Soeurs des Maternites Catholiques.
As is customary, the voluminous acts of the regularly-instituted canonical investigation, along with detailed reports from medical and legal experts, were submitted for scientific examination by the medical consultors of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints on 21 October 2010.
The experts of the congregation, having studied the depositions and the entire documentation with their customary scrupulousness, expressed their agreement concerning the scientifically inexplicable nature of the healing.
On 14 December the theological consultors, having examined the conclusions reached by the medical experts, undertook a theological evaluation of the case and unanimously recognised the unicity, antecedence and choral nature of the invocation made to Servant of God John Paul II, whose intercession was effective in this prodigious healing.
Finally, on 11 January 2011 the ordinary session of the cardinals and bishops of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints took place. They expressed their unanimous approval, believing the recovery of Sr. Marie Simon Pierre to be miraculous, having been achieved by God in a scientifically inexplicable manner following the intercession of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, trustingly invoked both by Sr. Simon herself and by many other faithful.
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 14/01/2011 18:46]