See preceding page for earlier posts on 11/15/10.
The day after Verbum Domini came out, a Catholic blogger wrote this lengthy piece about the apparent lack of attention from the Catholic blogosphere. If I had read it then, I might have said he was speaking too soon - it had only been released the day before, and it is a major document that does not lend itself to summarizing with the usual soundbites (or text bites) that media employ. And unless the blogger had nothing else to do for the day but read Verbum Domini, it still would have been a daunting task to then proceed to write your first commentary on it! You'd be asking yourself - if Joseph Ratzinger had been asked to comment on a document like this, how would he approach it?
This article is from a group blog by three Catholic Professors of Scripture and Theology: Michael Barber (John Paul the Great Catholic U, San Diego, CA) - who is the author of this piece; Brant Pitre, Notre Dame Seminary, New Orleans, LA). And John Bergsma (Franciscan University, Steubenville, OH). The blog name is from Vatican II, “the study of the sacred page is, as it were, the soul of sacred theology” (Dei Verbum,24).
While this article highlights many points that need to be highlighted about Verbum Domini, and Prof. Barber must be commented for his prompt and substantial reaction, it has quite a few striking and surprising naivetes here and there that one would not expect of a professor of theology and Scripture....
Are Catholic bloggers ignoring
the Pope's 'fundamental priority'?
by Michael Barber
Nov. 12, 2010
Yesterday was probably the most frustrating exciting day of the Pope Benedict's pontificate.
I may be about to get myself in hot water, but someone has to say it: many people, even Catholic bloggers, are ignoring the Pope’s “supreme and fundamental priority”.
What is it? How are even Catholics missing it? How was a disconnect between the Pope's priorities and those of Catholic writers on display yesterday?
Let me explain and let me issue a clarion call to all Catholic teachers, writers and bloggers to make the Pope's priority their priority.
If you simply followed the Pope by getting your information through the mainstream media, you'd probably get the impression that the Pope's top priority is cataloging and condemning each and every one of the evils in the world.
After all, look at the headlines on Google News just yesterday:
"Pope condemns violence 'in the name of God'"
"Pope condemns anti-Church sentiment"
Of course, since the Pope is expected to speak out against all the world's evils, he knows that he has to — when he doesn't, the headlines read, "Pope refuses to condemn. . ."
Even worse, some wrongfully and scurrilously accuse the Pope of being consumed with a cover-up — charges most thinking people have come to see through.
But you'd expect the mainstream media to get the Pope's message wrong. There's really no surprise there. Their anti-Catholicism is well-known.
[Not to mention their insouciant ignorance, in which they seem to revel. It's their ultimate expression of contempt, which says they do not take the Pope or the Church seriously enough to at least learn basic facts about them!]
What is surprising — even distressing! — is the way the Holy Father’s chief priority is overlooked by even Catholic bloggers!
Now don't get me wrong, Catholic writers generally recognize some of the chief concerns of Pope Benedict. Certainly, among them would be the following.
1. Unmasking the dangers associated with the "dictatorship of relativism".
2. Reforming the liturgy, e.g., overseeing more accurate translations of the liturgy and emphasizing the need to foster a greater sense of reverence for the Eucharist.
3. Addressing the need for a proper interpretation of the documents of the Second Vatican Council, i.e., the importance of reading these documents according to a "hermeneutic of continuity".
4. Presenting an "affirmative orthodoxy" to the world--i.e., explaining that Christianity is not best understood in terms of a "no" but rather as a "yes" to Christ.
5. Addressing the economic meltdown and the moral problems, which are at its root.
6. Filling vacant episcopal chairs with competent leaders.
7. The need and the challenge of proclaiming the Gospel to what increasingly seems like a post-Christian western culture, i.e., the need for a “New Evangelization”.
8. Dealing with the rise of militant Islam in a Christ-like way.
9. Speaking out against the persecutions throughout the world, particular in Muslim countries.
10. Emphasizing the need for the Church reform the way it has dealt with accusations of clergy sexual abuse.
11. Fostering priestly and religious vocations.
12. The responsibility Catholic institutions of higher learning have to maintain their Catholic identity.
13. Healing divisions in the Body of Christ, e.g., providing a pathway for reconciliation with Anglicans or members of schismatic groups, which have broken away from the Church.
The list above is just a sample of some of the important things the Holy Father has focused on during his pontificate — many other things could be mentioned.
But what if you were to ask the Pope, "Holy Father, what is the top priority for your papacy?" What do you suspect he might say? [An unnecessary question and set-up, to anyone who has been following Benedict XVI - because he has always been clear and consistent about it, but most emphatically in his March 10, 2009 letter to all the bishops of the world. To bring God to the world. And that is why one of the most memorable statements in JESUS OF NAZARETH was: "What has Jesus really brought?... The answer is very simple: God. He has brought God!' And that is why the Church as the extension of Christ in history, as his Mystical Body, must continue to do what he did - bring God to the world.]
Well, you don't have to wonder; he's answered the question, and, in fact, he did not mention any of the things listed above. And sadly, the item identified as the top priority gets short shrift--if any mention at all--in the Catholic blogosphere.
That’s not to say the concerns above are not important to him. They are. Yet when the Pope talked about his “supreme and fundamental” focus he actually named something else.
The sad thing is, most people — even Catholic writers — largely seem to ignore it, emphasizing to one degree or another other aspects of his papacy.
How does the Holy Father describe his top priority? Here's Benedict in his own words:
“Leading men and women to God, to the God who speaks in the Bible: this is the supreme and fundamental priority of the Church and of the Successor of Peter at the present time.”[1]
Leading people to "the God who speaks in the Bible" — that's the Pope's chief aim.
The Pope's clear focus on Scripture has been manifest throughout his papacy. Consider the following,
1. The Year of St. Paul. He devoted an entire year to St. Paul, calling the Church to pay closer attention to Scripture.
2. Numerous talks on St. Paul's teaching. During that year dedicated to St. Paul he meticulously went through the Apostle’s letters, giving numerous catechetical presentations on his teaching and theology.
3. Jesus of Nazareth, in 3 volumes! Much of his precious time has been spent writing a multi-volume work looking at Jesus in the Gospels, namely, Jesus of Nazareth. Volume 1 was a New York Times Best Seller. Volume 2 is about to be released soon, and there's a volume 3 waiting in the wings. This dimension of his papacy alone has highlighted in an important way the Pope's deep desire to lead the faithful to Bible study.
4. The Synod on Scripture. He called together a major Synod in which the bishops of the world gathered to Rome to discuss the role of Scripture in the life of the Church. Again, this was a hugely significant event.
5. New Translations of the Mass. The new translations of the liturgy he has overseen emphasize in a much clearer way the biblical roots of the prayers of the Mass.
Yesterday, then, was like the icing on the cake.
Pope Benedict released a 200-page document laying out in exhaustive detail the Church’s teaching on Scripture,
Verbum Domini. The document is a follow-up — almost three years after the fact! — to the Synod on Scripture he convened in 2008.
And yet, this is a historic document. The last major papal document on Scripture was published 57 years ago (
Divino afflante Spiritu [1943]). The last major magisterial document outlining Church teaching on Scripture was
Dei Verbum, a document of the second Vatican Council--dated to 1965, 45 years ago!
[Which was, one must note at every opportunity, the one Vatican-II document that Joseph Ratzinger most contributed to, and by all accounts, his favorite of the 16 Vatican II documents, perhaps because it is also the most unequivocal and orthodox, in the spirit of the Church Fathers (after whom, Biblical studies appeared to have started fading away from the Catholic mindset so that by the mid-20th century, few Catholics had any Biblical 'awareness'.]
Yet this historic and extensive document received only passing mention - if any at all - on many of the most popular Catholic websites.
Let me put it another way: imagine the Pope had released a 200=page letter on the Mass. What kind of treatment and analysis would that be getting? Is the Pope's teaching about the Bible not also worthy of careful attention?
[Prof. Barber forgets that the same thing happened with Sacramentum caritatis on the Eucharist, which was Benedict XVI's first Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation, and remains one of the least discussed of his major documents. It's because the Exhortations - based on the list of Propositions from the bishops of the Synodal assembly - are, by their nature, detailed and dense, in which every paragraph deserves a separate article and commentary, and cannot be reduced to a soundbite.]
In fact - I'm just going to come right out and say it - there does seem to be
a real over-reaction to Protestantism in Catholic circles.
[And is 'protestantism' defined then as a tendency to cite the Bible????] Quote chapter and verse from the Bible in some Catholic circles and you might get a weird look: are you really a Catholic? Yet Pope Benedict is calling for precisely that: memorization of Scripture in Catechesis (cf. Verbum Domini 74).
[Not 'memorization' for the sake of memorization, but to 'seal' one's familiarity with the passage, as it were.]
There seems to be a creeping suspicion in some Catholic circles that liturgy is for Catholics, the Bible is for Protestants
[not after Vatican=II, with the introduction of more Bible readings in the liturgy, although that certainly did not drive Catholics to read the Bible itself,not just the passages excerpted for the liturgy, and that's the reason Benedict XVI called the Synod on the Word of God/]]. The only problem is: that's not what the Pope himself is saying!
To some, perhaps the Synod's call for a renewed focus on Scripture is a distant memory, but not for the Holy Father!
Releasing the document almost three years later seems to make an important statement: Don't forget about the Synod — hearing "the God who speaks in the Bible" needs to remain our “supreme and fundamental” focus.
[Rather simplistic statements, that also contain a factual inaccuracy. The Synodal Assembly on the Word of God ended in late October 2008 - the Apostolic Exhortation is dated Sept. 30, less than 2 years later, not three. In comparison, Sacramentum caritatis was released in February 2007, 16 months after the assembly on the Eucharist. The Exhortations are not just 'reminders' - they are fundamental features of each Synodal Assembly, the official compendium of the assembly's recommendations and the only one of its pertinent documents that becomes part of the Magisterium.]
And,
just to reiterate how important the Bible is, the document is, once again, almost 200 pages long!
[The length of any document is not necessarily an index of its importance. Obviously, every subject of a Synodal Assembly has great specific significance to the Church. In the case of these exhortations, the document length is related to the number of Propositions presented to the Holy Father for his approval and commentary.]
He’s 83 years old. That’s quite an undertaking! He has spent almost three years
[two, not three!] crafting his message.
Clearly the Holy Father has a deep concern for calling Catholics to a greater appreciation for Scripture.
Indeed, at the beginning of the document the Holy Father explains:
"I wish to point out certain fundamental approaches to a rediscovery of God’s word in the life of the Church as a well-spring of constant renewal. At the same time I express my hope that the Word will be ever more fully at the heart of every ecclesial activity" (Verbum Domini, paragraph 1).
Three things here are important.
First: there needs to be a "rediscovery" of God's word. Apparently,
some have lost a biblical focus.
[An understatement. Most Catholics I know have never had a Biblical focus. And I suspect that's true of the greater part of regular-folk Catholics!]
Second:
for the Pope the riches of Scripture are inexhaustible. They represent a “well-spring of constant renewal.” In other words, the Synod in 2008 did not finish the job. We're not done talking about the Bible. [These are odd observations to make. I don't think even the most naive Catholic who follows Church news would ever think that the Bible was simply a subject for one Synod - and finito! There's a reason the Bible continues to be the top-selling book of all time, at any time althouch clearly, not all Bible-buyers are Catholics, and the bulk of such buyers are from the 'evangelical' churches. I think any Christian would appreciate that fact instinctively. I just read that the Bible publisher who serves the mainland China market has already sold 80 million copies this year...]
Third: the Word therefore must be more fully at the heart of everything the Church does. Period. The Bible is not a supplement. It is not optional. It is essential.
It must be the center of "everything" the Church does.
[That's also rather misleading. I believe the traditional center of Christian life in terms of resources for the faith is - a trinomial like the Trinity - Scripture, Tradition and Liturgy, not just one of them, and all of them pointing to the real center, Jesus Christ, Son of God and face of God.]
Later, citing the Synod, Benedict explains:
With the Synod Fathers I express my heartfelt hope for the flowering of “a new season of greater love for sacred Scripture on the part of every member of the People of God, so that their prayerful and faith-filled reading of the Bible will, with time, deepen their personal relationship with Jesus” (Verbum Domini, paragraph 72).
He also writes:
In a world which often feels that God is superfluous or extraneous, we confess with Peter that he alone has “the words of eternal life ” (Jn 6:68). There is no greater priority than this: to enable the people of our time once more to encounter God, the God who speaks to us and shares his love so that we might have life in abundance (cf. Jn 10:10)" (Verbum Domini, paragraph 2).
Of course, keep reading and you'll see that, for Benedict, the principle way we "hear" God "speak" His Word to us is by listening to his voice in Scripture.
In one section he cites St. Jerome, who linked the neglect of God's Word to the Eucharist.
Saint Jerome speaks of the way we ought to approach both the Eucharist and the word of God: “We are reading the sacred Scriptures. For me, the Gospel is the Body of Christ; for me, the holy Scriptures are his teaching. And when he says: whoever does not eat my flesh and drink my blood (Jn 6:53), even though these words can also be understood of the [Eucharistic] Mystery, Christ’s body and blood are really the word of Scripture, God’s teaching.
Then he describes the neglect of God’s word in terms of desecration of the Eucharist:
"When we approach the [Eucharistic] Mystery, if a crumb falls to the ground we are troubled. Yet when we are listening to the word of God, and God’s Word and Christ’s flesh and blood are being poured into our ears yet we pay no heed, what great peril should we not feel?”.[2]
This is a hugely impactful passage in the letter and I suspect the Church will be "digesting" it for some time.
Indeed, faithful Catholics would be horrified at the mishandling of the Eucharist at Mass. To imagine the precious blood being spilled all over the altar is an unthinkable thought. Yet the Word of God is poured out to us in the Bible--are we simply letting it fall to the ground?!
God is trying to speak to His Church in the Bible. Are we listening? What an affront it is to God to let those Bibles simply sit on shelves and collect dust! To ignore the Word of God proclaimed in the liturgy!
[No, don't mix apples and oranges, Liturgy is liturgy, and the Bible is the Bible. The necessarily brief Bible readings in the liturgy are selected according to some theological-pastoral-seasonal logic and are not meant to be a substitute for the Bible itself.]
To put it another way, we might say this. The phone is ringing. God is on the line. Is anyone going to pick up?
Benedict quotes revelation: "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice I will come in to him and eat with him" (Rev 3:20).
In fact, notice that hearing Christ's voice is the prelude to the banquet--if we fail to hear his voice in the Word, we will miss his coming in the Eucharistic banquet.
The Pope then goes on to offer a beautiful reflection on the “sacramentality” of God’s word:
Christ, truly present under the species of bread and wine, is analogously present in the word proclaimed in the liturgy. A deeper understanding of the sacramentality of God’s word can thus lead us to a more unified understanding of the mystery of revelation, which takes place through “deeds and words intimately connected”;[3] an appreciation of this can only benefit the spiritual life of the faithful and the Church’s pastoral activity.
Many Catholic writers have rightly identified restoring reverence for the liturgy as among the Pope’s top priorities. However, very few talk much about Scripture.
[Perhaps wisely not! Because they feel they do not know enough about it, nor are grounded enough in it. Then better they don't. But even in such context, they can and should quote Scripture when applicable to illumine and illustrate a personal experience, as some of them do.]
Just look around at the Catholic blogosphere for posts examining the meaning of Bible passages. Some of course do an excellent job of covering the Bible. Yet many never or hardly ever do.
And so, as I ran down the list of many of the top Catholic blogs yesterday, I was sad to find little if any mention of the Pope's historic document. For some it was a blip on the screen--if even that. Some haven't even mentioned it at all. It's like nothing happened!
Again, if this were a 200-page document on the Mass, people would be picking it apart, listening closely to the Holy Father.
[Not necessarily. Vide Sacramentum caritatis!]
It’s high time for Catholics to make the “supreme and fundamental priority” of the Pope, their "supreme and fundamental priority". Let us all work together with the Pope as he calls for a renewal of Catholic biblical studies.
As Jerome said, if the Eucharist were to fall to the ground we would be "troubled". Let us also be troubled by the way the words of Christ in Scripture are poured out and ignored, recognizing the “great peril” we place ourselves in when we fail to listen to God’s Word carefully.
Fellow Catholic bloggers: Let us offer biblical reflections. Let us talk about how we hear the Lord speaking to us in Scripture. Let us highlight lessons in the Sunday readings. Let us mention priests and bishops who do an outstanding job expounding Scripture, offering links to excellent homilies.
Over the next few weeks you will find more posts detailing elements of
Verbum Domini on
www.TheSacredPage.com. However, I challenge all Catholic writers to seize this moment and embrace the Pope’s call for a greater focus on the role of Scripture in the life of the Church.
ENDNOTES
[1] Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church Concerning the Remission of the Excommunication of the Four Bishops Consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre. Emphasis added.
[2] In Psalmum 147: CCL 78, 337-338.
[3] SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation Dei Verbum, 2.
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 19/11/2010 15:52]