feed
top
crea forum
cerca
feed
forum
supporto
discussione
cerca
Benedetto XVI Forum
Luogo d'incontro di tutti quelli che amano il Santo Padre.
Cerca
Mainly about BENEDICT XVI, plus relevant items on the Church & the Vatican
Accedi
THE CHURCH MILITANT - BELEAGUERED BY BERGOGLIANISM
Messaggi
OFF
LINE
TERESA BENEDETTA
Post: 32.111
Post: 14.197
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Registrato il: 20/01/2009
Administratore
Utente Gold
0
0
20/08/2018
03:05
How this pontificate keeps falsely
invoking Newman about'doctrinal development'
[When it, in fact, is making outright doctrinal change]
August 19, 2018
Every time the current regime has yet another doctrinal accident, 'developmemt' is invoked. The Graf von Schoenborn did it at the News Conference after Amoris laetitia when Diane Montagna asked whether that document contradicted Familiaris consortio.
Leering down at her, he even had the condescending impertinence to mention Blessed John Henry Newman. During the Deathgate scandal, the same naughty little word has again been bobbing around in the troubled waters.
What few commentators appear to have pointed out is that
Newman, when wrote his celebrated essay, had no intention of providing a blue-print to be cunningly used by future jesuitical pontiffs to disguise the reality of doctrinal change. He was describing what had happened in the past. And he was doing it as an Anglican to satisfy himself that the Catholic Church which he was on the point of joining had never changed its doctrine.
I do not recollect that during the Arian Controversy, or the Reformation disorders, either side ever justified the positions they tenaciously held by invoking Development. My impression is that each side simply bandied Scripture and Tradition cheerfully around so as to show that what they held was the truth "clearly" shown forth in Scripture and Tradition.
Bergoglianism has been encapsulated in an even more extreme form than this by the cynically blasphemous observation of the Jesuit "General" that the Lord's Words were not captured on camera, and by Fr Rosica's boastfully candid admission that the Church is now entirely at the mercy of a pope to whom neither Scripture nor Tradition are prescriptive.
Such exponents appear to offer a model of Christian teaching ministry unknown even to the heretics of earlier ages. Here we have not a heresy, but the supraheresy.
Earlier heresiarchs may have monkeyed around with, and perverted the sense of, both Scripture and Tradition, but, I think, never before have we had the diabolical claim that a major heretical teacher is quite simply free from any control whatsoever within the Word of God whether written or orally transmitted. When I use the term 'diabolical', I mean it in the fullest possible sense. The fingerprints all over these preposterous claims are unmistakeable.
Some celebrated words in
Pastor aeternus
of Vatican I admirably taught that
the Successor of St Peter was not promised the inspiration of the Spirit so that he could teach new doctrine, but so that by His help he could guard and faithfully set forth the Deposit of Faith handed down through the Apostles.
There is not, I think, any suggestion in this that he should energetically engage in "developing" it; still less, that he is totally free from its constraints.
Fr H does a great service in reminding us every so often about this principle so soundly rejected by Jorge Bergoglio who believes he knows better than Jesus, who acts and talks as if he were an improvement on Jesus - Jesus 2.0, as it were.
Visualizza l'intera discussione
Registrati
Accedi
Mainly about BENEDICT XVI, plus relevant items on the Church & the Vatican
Accedi
IL MIO PROFILO
LE MIE DISCUSSIONI
FORUM CHE SEGUI
LA MIA FORUM-CARD
MODIFICA FORUM-CARD
FAQ
TRADUCI
LOGOUT
Accedi
Registrati
FAQ
TRADUCI
Scatta o carica foto
Allega file
Inserisci link da url (card)
Incorpora url (YouTube/Twitter/...)
ACCETTA
RIFIUTA
Anteprima