Google+
È soltanto un Pokémon con le armi o è un qualcosa di più? Vieni a parlarne su Award & Oscar!
 

BENEDICT XVI: NEWS, PAPAL TEXTS, PHOTOS AND COMMENTARY

Ultimo Aggiornamento: 23/08/2021 11:16
Autore
Stampa | Notifica email    
05/06/2017 03:34
OFFLINE
Post: 31.160
Post: 13.250
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Registrato il: 20/01/2009
Administratore
Utente Gold


It was the most wonderful Pentecost Mass I can remember, and it was celebrated at Holy Innocents TODAY by Fr. Stravinskas (who got some significant flak from traditionalists
a few months ago because of some suggestions he had made about 'integrating' the traditional Mass and the Novus Ordo). Frankly, that controversial article surprised me
because Fr. S has been extremely and exquisitely punctilious in observing every detail of the TLM, as he did again today, especially with all the extra antiphons, sequences
and prayers to honor the Holy Spirit.... Catholic World Report, as usual, has posted Fr. S's homily from today...


Pentecost and the role of the laity
by Fr. Peter M.J. Stravinskas

June 4, 2017

A few weeks ago a woman came up to me after Mass and said, “Father, you’re just wonderful; you’re the best priest I’ve ever met.” I immediately recognized her for a woman of exceptionally refined tastes.

Then she went on. “You’re such a good preacher and have such a wonderful personality; have you ever received the Holy Spirit?” Without batting an eyelash, I said, “Yes, on at least four occasions”

“Oh, really?” She asked, “When?”

“At Baptism, Confirmation and when I was ordained a deacon and a priest.”

“Oh, not that, I mean the real thing.”

I share this story with you today because I think it highlights a certain lack of understanding that many Catholics have about the role and work of the Spirit in the Church.

On that first Pentecost nearly 2000 years ago, the Spirit came upon a frightened group of men and women and made them courageous public witnesses to the Christ-event.

Ruah in Hebrew is a very interesting word which means many things: spirit, breath, wind. It was this same ruah that spoke to Elijah in the gentle breeze, the same ruah that mightily overtook the early Christian community. It is important to notice that whenever God's Spirit comes upon a person, something happens.

When God’s Spirit moved over the waters in Genesis, the poet-theologian tells us that the work of creation began.

When God’s Spirit overshadowed the humble and obedient Virgin of Nazareth, the greatest event in history occurred.

When God’s Spirit came crashing in on the apostles and disciples, the Church was born. The Spirit gives people a sense of mission.

When God’s Spirit came upon you in Baptism and Confirmation, what happened to you?

Like the lady in the story I shared with you, are you still waiting for “the real thing,” or have you taken your visitation by the Holy Spirit seriously? Maybe better than asking what you have done, I should say, ‘What should you be doing because of God’s Spirit in your life?'

Pentecost celebrates the day when the Early Church made its debut and entered into its first dialogue with the world. The early believers unashamedly preached a crucified and risen Lord Who could lead people into union with the Father. Because of their conviction and fervor, three thousand were added that day.

When was the last time you preached the good news? I don’t mean setting up a soapbox on a street corner, but I do mean witnessing to Christ in your daily lives and letting people know how much Jesus means to you and how much you think He could mean to them. Sometimes your preaching will only be the silent testimony of your own good life.

Very often we hear people lament the fact that we don’t have as many converts today as we once did. Why is that the case? I believe it is because we don’t have the same kind of fervent convert-makers we once had among you, the laity.

If your faith is not as strong as it once was, your effectiveness will be diminished. We tend to forget –if we ever knew – that in the pre-Vatican II era, the vast majority of converts came to faith because of the witness of committed lay folk.

When the great English convert, Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, was asked what he considered the place of the laity to be, he quipped, “The Church would look rather silly without them!” And we often do look “rather silly” to the world today, precisely because of a dearth of apostolically minded laity.

All too many forget that St. Paul taught that every Christian has received certain gifts which are given for the good of the entire community. Christianity can never be simply an affair between God and me; it must always involve other people.

Therefore, I must ask myself what talents I have and how I have used them to further the spread of the Gospel and the growth of the Church.
- Am I a teacher? Do I use that charism or gift in a way that builds up the life of the Church?
- Do I have an especially keen mind for finances? Do I put that talent at the disposal of my parish community?
- If I have lots of time and could easily pray all day, do I ever pray for the needs of others, or do I simply burn up the wire asking for what I want?
- Do I have a way with the sick or elderly? Do I use that to aid those ailing members of Christ’s Body?

I think this kind of an examination of conscience might be a fitting way to observe Pentecost, to determine whether or not you have ignited the spark of God’s Spirit given to you in Baptism and Confirmation.

We frequently refer to Pentecost as the “birthday of the Church.” And so it is. Birthdays are opportunities for celebration, reflection and re-commitment.

When the Church was waiting to be born, a small group of nervous and timid people huddled together in an upper room in a spirit of prayer and expectancy. They were hoping for God to act in their lives. And He did.

He sent them the Spirit of Christ’s love, forgiveness and peace. Because they took the Spirit and His gifts seriously, they were able to renew the face of the earth. We need a new Pentecost today, and we need every member of Christ’s Church to be the agents of God’s great conspiracy to renew once more the face of the earth.

A nineteenth-century hymn prays for a new Pentecost to take place within the heart of every believer. Reflect on some of that hymn’s verses:

Breathe on me, breath of God,
Fill me with life anew,
That I may love the things you love,
And do what you would do.
Breathe on me, breath of God,
Until my heart is pure,
Until with you I have one will,
To live and to endure.
Breathe on me, breath of God,
My soul with grace refine,
Until this earthly part of me
Glows with your fire divine.
The prayer of the hymn-writer, like that of the Church, is that each one of us will open ourselves up to the life-giving breath of God, Who is the Spirit of Christ among us
.



Happy Birthday!


A few days earlier, Fr. Rutler (whom, alas for me, I have not had occasion to visit at St. Michael's after Cardinal Dolan moved him from the Church of Our Savior on lower Park Avenue,
way across town and sociocultural setting to Hell's Kitchen, where the Latin Mass is not part of the parish agenda,) wrote his reflections this year on Pentecost.


The first Pentecost was not
an occasion for 'enthusiasm'

FR. GEORGE W. RUTLER
June 1, 2017

The amiable classicist, John Bird Sumner, was the Protestant archbishop of Canterbury from 1848 to 1862. Amid theological controversies about baptismal regeneration and the like, his opposition to a parliamentary bill removing Jewish disabilities was unquestionably retrograde, but he assumed the progressive mantle in approving obstetric anesthesia which was opposed by some Christian fundamentalists, whose misogyny was not alien to current Muslim advocates of female circumcision.

It will be allowed that he had little choice after Queen Victoria had been anesthetized for the birth of Prince Leopold.

As a son of Cambridge rather than Oxford, his propensities were more Evangelical. Nonetheless, he is said to have blessed missionaries to India in the imperial radiance of the Raj with the counsel that they were to “convert the heathen and discourage Enthusiasm.”

Now, among the Anglo-Saxon race, one of the more sober insults was to label a man as “hearty.” But Enthusiasm understood with a capital E was Methodism and its ancillary non-conformist forms, which emphasized emotion over reason.

When the apostles and the women with them in the Upper Room received the Holy Spirit as promised by the Lord who never lies, they were filled with a power that has changed the world. It did not change their intellect.

There is no literature in the classical corpus more replete with incontestable reason obedient to the divine Logic than the preaching of the apostles.

Our Lord promised that the Holy Spirit would lead into all truth. This activates the intellect and does not replace it. Enthusiasm is not spiritual zeal if it asks reason to move over so that emotion might take its place. The Enthusiasm that Dr. Sumner abjured displaced the Logos with the Ego.

That of course is an old story, elegantly and eloquently documented in the masterwork of Monsignor Ronald Knox, Enthusiasm. While not unsympathetic toward the noble integrity of John Wesley, he holds up the spiritist movements from the second century Montanists to the latter day Quakers, Jansenists, and Quietists as examples of how people go to extremes to confuse themselves emotionally with the Holy Spirit. [Ah yes, we are daily given such an example by the current Successor of Peter.]

At Pentecost, the Apostles spoke the languages of the far-flung regions of the Jewish diaspora. Modern “speaking in tongues” is not the equivalent of the manifestation of real languages. Even when there was such, Saint Paul diminished it, subordinating it to interpretation.

Saint Irenaeus mentions contemporaries who spoke “through the Spirit” in all kinds (pantodapais) of tongues. Saint Francis Xavier much later preached in tongues he had not learned, but they were real languages, and, if one is willing to accept it, on only two occasions: in Travancor and again at Amanguci.

It is curious that the charismatic movements after the Second Vatican Council should have neglected the Latin of the Universal Church, before affecting exotic and unintelligible speech.

As an inveterate and unapologetic New Yorker whose pastoral obligations require speaking various languages, it seems that a really miraculous gift of the Holy Spirit would enable people in Manhattan to speak grammatical English, the equivalent of the dialect of the Diaspora spoken at Pentecost, and the contradiction of faux glossolalia.

False Pentecostal enthusiasm tries to energize the emotions but not the intellect.

It is a wise policy, issuing from experience, and one hopes not from cynicism, to distrust email messages that begin by saying that the writer is “excited to share” something. This inevitably includes an overuse of exclamation points. Mark Twain and F. Scott Fitzgerald equally disdained the use of exclamation points as a kind of laughter at your own jokes.

Exclamation points signal a failure to get a sober point across, and are the grammatical equivalent of the vaudeville performers who waved the American flag and held a baby to prevent the bored audience from throwing objects at them. [Oh dear! I must cover myself in sackcloth and ashes as I am an inveterate exclamation-pointer! Two right there, already. Though I never use them to indicate anything funny.]

In religion, various movements that in practice move nowhere, keep pumping themselves up with excited promises of something great about to happen, some new committee or rally or bureaucratic program for evangelization that blurs the distinction between the Good News and novelty.

Such was the case in Phrygia of Asia Minor in what is now Turkey during the second century. A convert priest named Montanus stirred up a lot of excitement when he confused himself with the Holy Spirit and proclaimed various “prophecies” while in a trance, like a sort of divine ventriloquist. In the manner of a typical fanatic so defined, he was confident that God would agree with him if only God had all the facts. [B][How Bergoglian! (That did need an exclamation point)]

In a languid and dissolute period, the local churches already having become formalistic and arid (contrary to romantic depictions of the uniform zeal of all early Christians, and not unlike the motivation of John Wesley to stir up the dormant Church of England), the ardor of Montanus attracted many as far as North African and Rome itself, not all of whom were innocent of neurosis. Even the formidable mind of Tertullian welcomed it.

Sensational outbursts of emotion were thought to be divinely inspired, and the formal clerical structure of the Church was caricatured as the sort of rigidity that quenches the spirit.

Avowing that prophecy did not end with the last apostles, new messages were pronounced, false speaking in tongues pretending to be actual languages was encouraged, and women like Priscilla and Maximilla left their husbands and decided that they could be priestesses and prophetesses.

In the twentieth century, the Montanist heresy sprung up again. The Pentecostal sects, and even many Catholics were attracted to “re-awakenings” that gave the impression that the Paraclete promised by Christ who never lied had finally come awake having slumbered pretty much since the early days of the Church.

While its extreme forms were bizarre, such as dancing in churches and uncontrolled laughter and barking like dogs while rolling on the floor, any quest for novelty quickly grows bored, for nothing goes out of fashion so fast as the latest fashion.

In preparing for the celebration of Pentecost the Church prays for a holy reception of the truth “ever ancient ever new” which comes not through a Second Pentecost or a Third Pentecost, but through an embrace of God’s timeless grace. Christ makes “all things new” and does not superficially make all new things (Rev. 21: 5).

Heresies are fads. The estimable Servant of God Father John Hardon, whose talks would never be called ecstatic, bluntly said that the modern Charismatics are Montanists. It is true that the Charismatic movement in the Catholic Church wisely was blessed insofar as it not denigrate from or add to authentic dogma.

But in the second century the pope Eleutherius was inclined to condone the Montanists too, until the anti-Tertullian theologian Praxeas explained its problems.

Chesterton described the romance of orthodoxy whose Church is like a chariot “thundering through the ages, the dull heresies sprawling and prostrate, the while truth reeling but erect.”

The truth needs no artificial excitement or orchestrated exclamation points, for when the mystery of God is revealed, all and every element in the cataract of creation collapses into silent awe
(Rev. 8:1) and then … the Great Amen.

Christ promised that the Holy Spirit would enable human intelligence to embrace depths of reality beyond the limits of natural experience. Here at work is the principle of Saint Thomas Aquinas: “Grace does not destroy nature, but perfects it.”

The apostles became more intensely human when they received the power of the Holy Spirit, to the extent that they traveled to lands beyond the limited environs of their early years, with a courage never before tested.

They received the “glory” that Christ, on the night before he died, prayed that his disciples might share. Because that participation in the divine nature bridges time and eternity, there is an invigorating terror about it: not the dread of being diminished or annihilated, but the trembling awesomeness of breaking the bonds of death itself.

When the Holy Spirit moves a man from aimless biological existence to what Christ calls the “fullness” of life, the reaction is a little like that of someone who has heard simple tunes but then encounters a symphony.

Simple pleasures may evoke smiles, but the deepest joys can move one to tears, and that is why there is that curious experience of not laughing for joy but weeping for joy, and the equally enigmatic experience of lovesickness.

Oft quoted is the diary account by Samuel Pepys in the seventeenth century after attending a concert: “ …that which did please me beyond anything in the whole world was the wind-musique when the Angel comes down, which is so sweet that it ravished me; and indeed, in a word, did wrap up my soul so that it made me really sick, just as I have formerly been when in love with my wife.”

An admirer of Jascha Heifetz told him after a performance that his violin had such a beautiful tone. The maestro placed his ear against the Stradivarius and said, “I hear nothing.” By way of metaphor, it may be said that we exist biologically as wonderful instruments: the brain itself is the most complex organism in the universe. But we make celestial music, attaining the “tone” of virtue, only when the Holy Spirit conjoins our human nature with the Source of Life.

At Pentecost, all who worship God are transfigured by his holy light. No man-made enthusiasm can equal the transporting eloquence of the unutterable Logos. So spoke Saint Cyril of Jerusalem:

“As light strikes the eyes of a man who comes out of darkness into the sunshine and enables him to see clearly things he could not discern before, so light floods the soul of the man counted worthy of receiving the Holy Spirit and enables him to see things beyond the range of human vision, things hitherto undreamed of.”


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 05/06/2017 03:59]
Nuova Discussione
 | 
Rispondi
Cerca nel forum

Feed | Forum | Bacheca | Album | Utenti | Cerca | Login | Registrati | Amministra
Crea forum gratis, gestisci la tua comunità! Iscriviti a FreeForumZone
FreeForumZone [v.6.1] - Leggendo la pagina si accettano regolamento e privacy
Tutti gli orari sono GMT+01:00. Adesso sono le 06:14. Versione: Stampabile | Mobile
Copyright © 2000-2024 FFZ srl - www.freeforumzone.com