I've been trying to post this item for the past several days, but finally, here it is. Anyone who has been following this thread will not be surprised
to find that my answer to Prof. De Mattei's question in the title is this: Bergoglio belongs to his own church which he has been busy setting
up these past three years and seven months - literally on the back of the Roman Catholic Church, in the belief that the overwhelming
majority of Catholics won't know the difference, nor would they care...
In the same way, I would not hesitate to answer the no-longer rhetorical question "Is the pope Catholic?" with a resounding NO! He's a Bergoglian
acting narcissistically for himself alone, who is founding Bergoglianism just as Luther founded Lutheranism, and the most dangerous of
anti-Catholics because he is doing it all while being the man elected to lead the Roman Catholic Church, not to replace it with his own
pseudo-church.
To which Church does Pope Bergoglio belong?
by Roberto de Mattei
Translated for Rorate caeli by 'Francesca Romana' from
October 19, 2016
Two anniversaries overlap each other in 2017: the 100 years of the Fatima apparitions, occurring between May 13th and October 13th 1917, and the 500 years of Luther’s revolt, beginning in Wittenberg, Germany, October 31st 1517.
However, there are two other much less discussed anniversaries which also fall next year: the 300 years of the official foundation of Freemasonry (London, June 24th 1717) and the 100 years of the Russian Revolution of October 26th 1917 (the Julian calendar in use in the Russian Empire: November 8th according to the Gregorian calendar).
Yet, between the Protestant Revolution and the Communist Revolution through to the French Revolution, the daughter of Freemasonry, there runs an indissoluble red thread which Pius XII, in his famous discourse
Nel contemplare of October 12th 1952, summed up in three historic phrases, corresponding to Protestantism, the Age of Enlightenment and Marxist atheism:
Christ – yes, Church – no. God – yes, Christ – no. Finally the impious cry:
God is dead; in fact: God has never been”.
The anarchic yearnings of Communism were already implicitly present in the first Protestant negations – observed Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira: “Whether from the point of view of Luther’s explicit formation, all of the tendencies, all of the mind-set, all of the imponderable elements of the Lutheran explosion, carried already in itself, in a very authentic and full way, even if implicit, the spirit of Voltaire and Robespierre, Marx and Lenin”
(Revolution and Counter-Revolution, Sugarco, Milan, 2009, pp.61-62).
In this respect, the errors the Soviet Russia spread, starting from 1917, were a chain of ideological aberrations from Marx and Lenin which went back to the first Protestant heresiarchs. The 1517 Lutheran Revolution can therefore be considered one of the most nefarious events in the history of humanity, on par with the Masonic revolution in 1789, and the Communist one in 1917. Further, the message of Fatima, which foresaw the spreading of Communist errors throughout the world, contains implicitly the rejection of the errors of Protestantism and the French Revolution.
The start of the centenary of the Fatima apparitions on October 13th 2016 was buried under a blanket of silence. That same day, Pope Francis received in the Paul VI Audience Hall, a thousand Lutheran “pilgrims” and in the Vatican a statue of Martin Luther was honoured, as appears in the images Antonio Socci published on his Facebook page.
Next October 31st, moreover, Pope Francis will go to Lund in Sweden, where he will take part in a joint Catholic-Lutheran ceremony commemorating the 500th anniversary of the Reformation. As can be read in the communiqué drawn up by the World Lutheran Federation and the Papal Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, the aim of the event is “to express the gifts of the Reform and ask forgiveness for the division perpetuated by Christians of the two traditions.”
The Waldensian theologian and pastor, Paolo Ricca, involved for decades in ecumenical dialogue, voiced his satisfaction “seeing as it is the first time a Pope commemorates the Reform. This, in my opinion, constitutes a step forward with regard to the important aims that have been achieved with the Second Vatican Council, which - by including in its texts and so giving value to some fundamental principles and themes of the Reform – marked a decisive turning point in the relationships between Catholics and Protestants.
By taking part in the commemoration, as the highest representative of the Catholic Church is prepared to do, means, in my view, to consider the Reform as a positive event in the history of the Church which also did some good for Catholicism.
The participation at the commemoration is a gesture of great relevance also because the Pope is going to Lund, to the home of the Lutherans; as if he were one of the family. My impression is, in a way I wouldn’t know how to define, that he also feels part of that portion of Christianity born of the Reform.”
According to Ricca, the main contribution offered by Pope Francis is
“his effort to reinvent the papacy, that is, the search for a new and different way of understanding and living the ministry of the Bishop of Rome.
This search – presuming my interpretation somewhat hits the mark - might take us a long way, since the papacy – because of the way it has been understood and lived over the last 1000 years – is one of the great obstacles to Christian Unity. It seems to me Pope Francis is moving towards a model of the papacy different to the traditional one, with respect to which the other Christian Churches might take on new positions. If it were so, this theme might be completely reconsidered in ecumenical circles.”
The fact that this interview was published on October 9th by Vatican Insider, considered a semi-official Vatican site, makes one think that this interpretation of the Lund trip as well as the papal intentions, have been authorized and are agreeable to Pope Francis.
During his audience with the Lutherans on October 13th, Pope Bergoglio also said that proselytism, is “the strongest poison” against ecumenism.
“The greatest reformers are the saints – he added - and the Church is always in need of reform”. These words contain simultaneously, as is frequent in his discourses, a truth and a deception.
The truth is that the saints, including St Gregory VII and St. Pius X, have [indeed] been the greatest reformers.
The deception consists in insinuating that the pseudo-reformers, like Luther, are to be considered saints.
The statement that proselytism or the missionary spirit, is “the strongest poison against ecumenism” must, instead, be reversed: Ecumenism, as it is understood today, is the greatest poison against the Church’s missionary spirit.
The Saints have always been moved by this spirit, beginning with the Jesuits who landed in Brazil, the Congo and the Indies in the XVI century, while their confreres Diego Lainez, Alfonso Salmeron and Peter Canisius, at the Council of Trent, fought against the errors of Lutheranism and Calvinism.
Yet,
according to Pope Francis those outside the Church do not have to be converted. [How often has he said this! Yet he prided himself on the supposed 'continental mission' launched by the Latin American bishops in Aparecida in 2006 (all because he chaired the committee that drafted the final document). But it has been a resounding failure because it has not stopped the growth of evangelical Protestantism in Latin America at the expense of Catholicism.
As pope, Bergoglio has singlehandedly killed the very idea of Catholic mission, and I continue to believe that Benedict XVI meant that when he chose to say to the Pontifical Lateran University in October 2014 that 'inter-religious dialog is no substitute for mission'. ]
At the audience on October 13th, in an off-the-cuff response to questions from some young people, he said: “I like good Lutherans a lot, Lutherans who truly follow the faith of Jesus Christ. On the contrary, I don’t like lukewarm Catholics and lukewarm Lutherans.”
With another deformation in language, Bergoglio calls
“good Lutherans” those Protestants who do not follow the faith of Jesus Christ, but “lukewarm Catholics” those fervent sons and daughters of the Church who reject the equalizing of the truth of the Catholic religion with the error of Lutheranism.
All of this brings us to the question: What will happen in Lund on October 31st?
[I do not think it entirely unlikely that the Catholic bishop of whatever is considered to be Luther's home diocese in Germany will formally propose to Bergoglio to open a cause for the beatification and eventual canonization of Martin Luther, nor that JMB himself could proclaim Luther 'santo subito' then and there!]
We know that the commemoration will include a joint celebration based on the Liturgical Catholic-Lutheran guide, Common Prayer, elaborated from the document
From Conflict to Communion: The Common Catholic-Lutheran Commemoration of the Reformation in 2017, drawn-up by the Catholic-Lutheran Commission for the Unity of Christians.
There are those who rightly fear an “intercommunion” between Catholic and Lutherans, which would be sacrilegious, since the Lutherans do not believe in Transubstantiation.
Above all, however, that it will be said Luther was not a heresiarch, but a reformer unjustly persecuted and that the Church has to recuperate the “gifts of the Reform”. Those who persist in considering the condemnation of Luther proper and think his followers heretics and schismatics, must be harshly criticised as unworthy of 'the church of Pope Francis'.
But then again, what church does Jorge Mario Bergoglio belong to?
[I wish I could design an appropriate logo and banner for Bergoglianism and the church of Bergoglio!]
[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 26/10/2016 04:20]